Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Trevor kettle is back for the Burton game

1356

Comments

  • Cloudworm said:
    RedRobin said:
    I expect both clubs to appeal the red cards and expect both to be rescinded, both should have got yellow cards nothing more. Kettle lost control of that first half and didn’t even see the incident and instead relied on his lino, who got it wrong, comical all round. The bloke is a clown and is up there with Keith Shroud. 
    Neither player should have their red card rescinded for being stupid enough to do it in a Trevor Kettle game

    We all know his reputation, the Burton commentary team knew of his reputation before the game, and am sure that the Charlton and Burton Management teams warned their players not to take any risks under him.

    To be fair he did the right thing by going to his linesman, better to check than to guess - The linesman is then only going to give his assessment over what he's seen, then its up to Kettle to decide on the punishment based on that.
    I dont agree with this letting him off the hook because he spoke to the linesman. That assumes the linesman saw things clearly from the get-go, for starters. He spent a long time talking to the linesman before sending off the Nabster too. In that case both the cameras and officials had ( or should have had) a clear view, so its a matter of judgement whether it was so dangerous as to warrant a red. Kettle’s judgement, not the lino’s, but as yesterday he made a big ceremony and implicated the lino in his decision.

    Most people who saw the Nabsteŕs foul agreed it should have been only a yellow. Neither the footage from yesterday nor the view of most people in the Charlton end allows for a clear view of what happened. And Kettle himself was not watching, Valley Pass proved that much. In such situations of doubt, so early in the game, yellow should be the default, because refs also have an obligation to the paying customers not to distort what they paid to watch. I doubt that such an obligation has remotely figured in Kettlés thinking.
    That's not in the laws, so it shouldn't be. It's a decision based on what any of the four officials have seen. We must assume the linesman saw it clear enough for the decision to be made. 
    Of course I know perfectly well that the written law does not and never will have anything to say about when in the game a red can be shown. That is not my point at all.

    We all understand that the referee has to exercise his judgement, and it is not easy to get it right. My point was that if he is in doubt, then a red card in the first 20 minutes should be avoided, because they radically change the nature of the game. Yesterday actually had a good open feel about it until that happened. As for "we must assume" the linesman saw it clearly" then again, we are talking about Kettle here. No such assumption is safe to make. I would bet a fair bit of money that he has more early red cards to his name than most if not all the refs on the list. 

    Steve Brown, who I think is much more effective in the studio than as co-commentator, was firmly convinced they should have had yellows, and he would have had the chance to see the replays on a decent screen and discuss it with the fellow pros. Although Josh Parker thought Stockley's red was correct. Scotty didnt call it...
    He’s a strong ref who applies the laws strictly and in my view, bravely. I like that but I guess you prefer more lenient refs. That’s ok. 

    I don’t think he had a choice when two players go at it after 17 minutes like that. Otherwise he gets written up when they do it again 10 minutes later.

    As for Steve Brown, he’s only seen what you and I have seen and I disagree that former professionals are necessary good at interpreting the laws of the game. Similar to CL, 99% of them would never have read the rule book, or reffed any games.

    We can agree that Brown’s better in the studio. I’d love him to take Terry with him too though!

    All the best.
  • Famewo missing next game for that unwarranted time wasting booking is the travesty here

    Stockley deserved his red

    Both are gonna be huge misses for us in the next game

    Stockley being out for 3 games is a serious threat to our momentum.  
  • Cloudworm said:
    Cloudworm said:
    RedRobin said:
    I expect both clubs to appeal the red cards and expect both to be rescinded, both should have got yellow cards nothing more. Kettle lost control of that first half and didn’t even see the incident and instead relied on his lino, who got it wrong, comical all round. The bloke is a clown and is up there with Keith Shroud. 
    Neither player should have their red card rescinded for being stupid enough to do it in a Trevor Kettle game

    We all know his reputation, the Burton commentary team knew of his reputation before the game, and am sure that the Charlton and Burton Management teams warned their players not to take any risks under him.

    To be fair he did the right thing by going to his linesman, better to check than to guess - The linesman is then only going to give his assessment over what he's seen, then its up to Kettle to decide on the punishment based on that.
    I dont agree with this letting him off the hook because he spoke to the linesman. That assumes the linesman saw things clearly from the get-go, for starters. He spent a long time talking to the linesman before sending off the Nabster too. In that case both the cameras and officials had ( or should have had) a clear view, so its a matter of judgement whether it was so dangerous as to warrant a red. Kettle’s judgement, not the lino’s, but as yesterday he made a big ceremony and implicated the lino in his decision.

    Most people who saw the Nabsteŕs foul agreed it should have been only a yellow. Neither the footage from yesterday nor the view of most people in the Charlton end allows for a clear view of what happened. And Kettle himself was not watching, Valley Pass proved that much. In such situations of doubt, so early in the game, yellow should be the default, because refs also have an obligation to the paying customers not to distort what they paid to watch. I doubt that such an obligation has remotely figured in Kettlés thinking.
    That's not in the laws, so it shouldn't be. It's a decision based on what any of the four officials have seen. We must assume the linesman saw it clear enough for the decision to be made. 
    Of course I know perfectly well that the written law does not and never will have anything to say about when in the game a red can be shown. That is not my point at all.

    We all understand that the referee has to exercise his judgement, and it is not easy to get it right. My point was that if he is in doubt, then a red card in the first 20 minutes should be avoided, because they radically change the nature of the game. Yesterday actually had a good open feel about it until that happened. As for "we must assume" the linesman saw it clearly" then again, we are talking about Kettle here. No such assumption is safe to make. I would bet a fair bit of money that he has more early red cards to his name than most if not all the refs on the list. 

    Steve Brown, who I think is much more effective in the studio than as co-commentator, was firmly convinced they should have had yellows, and he would have had the chance to see the replays on a decent screen and discuss it with the fellow pros. Although Josh Parker thought Stockley's red was correct. Scotty didnt call it...
    He’s a strong ref who applies the laws strictly and in my view, bravely. I like that but I guess you prefer more lenient refs. That’s ok. 

    I don’t think he had a choice when two players go at it after 17 minutes like that. Otherwise he gets written up when they do it again 10 minutes later.

    As for Steve Brown, he’s only seen what you and I have seen and I disagree that former professionals are necessary good at interpreting the laws of the game. Similar to CL, 99% of them would never have read the rule book, or reffed any games.

    We can agree that Brown’s better in the studio. I’d love him to take Terry with him too though!

    All the best.
    If every ref was like Kettle barely any matches would end with 11 men on each side.
  • Trevor Kettle makes my blood boil!
  • Scoham said:
    Cloudworm said:
    Cloudworm said:
    RedRobin said:
    I expect both clubs to appeal the red cards and expect both to be rescinded, both should have got yellow cards nothing more. Kettle lost control of that first half and didn’t even see the incident and instead relied on his lino, who got it wrong, comical all round. The bloke is a clown and is up there with Keith Shroud. 
    Neither player should have their red card rescinded for being stupid enough to do it in a Trevor Kettle game

    We all know his reputation, the Burton commentary team knew of his reputation before the game, and am sure that the Charlton and Burton Management teams warned their players not to take any risks under him.

    To be fair he did the right thing by going to his linesman, better to check than to guess - The linesman is then only going to give his assessment over what he's seen, then its up to Kettle to decide on the punishment based on that.
    I dont agree with this letting him off the hook because he spoke to the linesman. That assumes the linesman saw things clearly from the get-go, for starters. He spent a long time talking to the linesman before sending off the Nabster too. In that case both the cameras and officials had ( or should have had) a clear view, so its a matter of judgement whether it was so dangerous as to warrant a red. Kettle’s judgement, not the lino’s, but as yesterday he made a big ceremony and implicated the lino in his decision.

    Most people who saw the Nabsteŕs foul agreed it should have been only a yellow. Neither the footage from yesterday nor the view of most people in the Charlton end allows for a clear view of what happened. And Kettle himself was not watching, Valley Pass proved that much. In such situations of doubt, so early in the game, yellow should be the default, because refs also have an obligation to the paying customers not to distort what they paid to watch. I doubt that such an obligation has remotely figured in Kettlés thinking.
    That's not in the laws, so it shouldn't be. It's a decision based on what any of the four officials have seen. We must assume the linesman saw it clear enough for the decision to be made. 
    Of course I know perfectly well that the written law does not and never will have anything to say about when in the game a red can be shown. That is not my point at all.

    We all understand that the referee has to exercise his judgement, and it is not easy to get it right. My point was that if he is in doubt, then a red card in the first 20 minutes should be avoided, because they radically change the nature of the game. Yesterday actually had a good open feel about it until that happened. As for "we must assume" the linesman saw it clearly" then again, we are talking about Kettle here. No such assumption is safe to make. I would bet a fair bit of money that he has more early red cards to his name than most if not all the refs on the list. 

    Steve Brown, who I think is much more effective in the studio than as co-commentator, was firmly convinced they should have had yellows, and he would have had the chance to see the replays on a decent screen and discuss it with the fellow pros. Although Josh Parker thought Stockley's red was correct. Scotty didnt call it...
    He’s a strong ref who applies the laws strictly and in my view, bravely. I like that but I guess you prefer more lenient refs. That’s ok. 

    I don’t think he had a choice when two players go at it after 17 minutes like that. Otherwise he gets written up when they do it again 10 minutes later.

    As for Steve Brown, he’s only seen what you and I have seen and I disagree that former professionals are necessary good at interpreting the laws of the game. Similar to CL, 99% of them would never have read the rule book, or reffed any games.

    We can agree that Brown’s better in the studio. I’d love him to take Terry with him too though!

    All the best.
    If every ref was like Kettle barely any matches would end with 11 men on each side.
    I agree. A sad indictment of the conduct and attitudes of the modern player!
  • edited November 2021
    Leuth said:
    They had a fucking fight on the pitch. Of course they had to be sent off ffs
    If there were replays/zoom ins, the incident will increasingly look worse. The best defence for it being a yellow was that it was "Kettle the ref" or "the linesman gave it". Neither comment analyses the incident. 

    As I've mentioned, from there onwards, one of them would have been sent off anyway and probably Stockley as he thinks he's Duncan Ferguson at the moment.
  • Serious question. Can the club write to the EFL and just say we do not want this man put in charge of anymore of our games? 
  • Serious question. Can the club write to the EFL and just say we do not want this man put in charge of anymore of our games? 
    And the lead singer of Echo and the Bunnymen
  • Sponsored links:


  • Serious question. Can the club write to the EFL and just say we do not want this man put in charge of anymore of our games? 
    Bloke might as well retire then

    I've posted it a few times, but sometimes wonder if its potentially just us that appear to have an issue with a certain referee

    But listening to Burton on Saturday, it seems he's disliked bloody everywhere!!
  • A team booking - You get your centreback who is a yellow away from a suspension to time waste and miss the next game V the league leaders in a position you are short. 

    It just shows how badly he reads people/teams/the game.
  • Yeah, the Famewo booking feels like his most egregious decision. I mean the DJ one too. Idk I didn't see the game. He's a bad referee
  • For me all referees have to be measured against the great Jarnail Singh. Took absolutely no bullshit from anyone, was decisive and crucially, consistent.

    Trevor Kettle is a fucking moron of a referee because he isn't the worst by a long chalk but he cannot help himself making headliner decisions that affect games. Deji and Stockley should have been spoken to, at worst booked. The handbags afterwards makes it look bad. He booked Famewo when it was their bench who threw the ball away yet doesn't book our keeper 


  • edited November 2021
    The referee's explanation was that there were no fists or elbows thrown, but that both men were sent off for 'excessive grappling'. 
    The Famewo booking for the throw-in was described by him as a 'team booking' (making an example of him, I guess?) which now results in him being suspended. 
    Make of that what you will. 
    Don't actually hate that team booking idea. Hate to see timewasting, and glad there's a ref who cards for it, just a real shame it was Famewo who got the card.

    Kettle called penalty the dive right so he wasn't all bad on Saturday.
  • Croydon said:
    The referee's explanation was that there were no fists or elbows thrown, but that both men were sent off for 'excessive grappling'. 
    The Famewo booking for the throw-in was described by him as a 'team booking' (making an example of him, I guess?) which now results in him being suspended. 
    Make of that what you will. 
    Don't actually hate that team booking idea. Hate to see timewasting, and glad there's a ref who cards for it, just a real shame it was Famewo who got the card.

    Kettle called penalty the dive right so he wasn't all bad on Saturday.
    Well I was right behind it and the keeper looked like he changed the direction of the player I.e pen! 
  • Croydon said:
    The referee's explanation was that there were no fists or elbows thrown, but that both men were sent off for 'excessive grappling'. 
    The Famewo booking for the throw-in was described by him as a 'team booking' (making an example of him, I guess?) which now results in him being suspended. 
    Make of that what you will. 
    Don't actually hate that team booking idea. Hate to see timewasting, and glad there's a ref who cards for it, just a real shame it was Famewo who got the card.

    Kettle called penalty the dive right so he wasn't all bad on Saturday.
    Well I was right behind it and the keeper looked like he changed the direction of the player I.e pen! 
    You must have been standing near me as I was also right behind it.
    I called dive straight away.
    All about opinions I guess. 
  • Croydon said:
    The referee's explanation was that there were no fists or elbows thrown, but that both men were sent off for 'excessive grappling'. 
    The Famewo booking for the throw-in was described by him as a 'team booking' (making an example of him, I guess?) which now results in him being suspended. 
    Make of that what you will. 
    Don't actually hate that team booking idea. Hate to see timewasting, and glad there's a ref who cards for it, just a real shame it was Famewo who got the card.

    Kettle called penalty the dive right so he wasn't all bad on Saturday.
    I would prefer the ref added the correct amount of time on. That would stop it.
  • Sponsored links:


  • It was a blatant dive which was made even more clear by the lack of remonstration from their forward. 
  • The way he dishes cards out.....compared to the Ref who allowed a Rotherham player to escape an obvious yellow to be subbed a minute later.


  • edited November 2021
    mendonca said:
    The way he dishes cards out.....compared to the Ref who allowed a Rotherham player to escape an obvious yellow to be subbed a minute later.


    But we did criticise the Rotherham ref and rightly so. The thing about Saturday is we are debating the decision. Ultimately if Kettle's assistant said they were fighting, he had to send them off. I still believe that a ref sees that and it is two bookings, but no point us dwelling further. It is what it is and we need to look forwards. 
  • You can say Kettle is consistent, just that he is consistently shit.


  • Seems he was a bit over keen last time he refereed a Plymouth game.
  • Addickted said:


    Seems he was a bit over keen last time he refereed a Plymouth game.
    Did someone jab him with happy pills for the Portsmouth game?
  • Addickted said:


    Seems he was a bit over keen last time he refereed a Plymouth game.
    Did someone jab him with happy pills for the Portsmouth game?
    Probably the same assessor who gave him a dose at HT on Saturday………..

  • Serious question. Can the club write to the EFL and just say we do not want this man put in charge of anymore of our games? 
    I am sure they can but wont take any notice as its us....Anyone remember that appalling ref we had a few years ago against Peterborough, who capped his performance off by giving a ridiculous penalty in the last minute. We complained and they gave us him again a few weeks later at home.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!