Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Charlton v Cambridge (closes Sunday teatime)

13»

Comments

  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 6 
    Inniss: 5 - Gave the ball away for the goal
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 6
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 8
    Rak-Sakyi: 6 - Will be fine when up to speed with 2 games a week
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
  • edited August 2022

    Wollacott: 8
    Clare: 8
    Inniss: 6
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 6
    Morgan: 6
    Dobson: 8
    Fraser: 7
    Rak-Sakyi: 6
    Stockley: 5
    Kirk: 6
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee:3






  • Wollacott: 6.5
    Clare: 7.5
    Inniss: 6.5
    O'Connell: 6
    Clayden: 6.5
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 6.5
    Fraser: 7.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 5.5
    Stockley: 5
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: r

  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss:4 
    O'Connell:6 
    Clayden:7 
    Morgan:7 
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser:7 
    Rak-Sakyi:5 
    Stockley:6 
    Kirk:7 
    Payne:7 
    Leaburn:7 
  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 6.5
    O'Connell: 6
    Clayden: 6
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 6
    Fraser: 8
    Rak-Sakyi: 5.5
    Stockley: 7
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
  • Wollacott: 8, saves kept us in it
    Clare: 5, kept getting sucked into the middle allowing Cambridge to put dangerous crosses in, including for the goal
    Inniss: 5, not great
    O'Connell: 7 did okay 
    Clayden:  5, dangerous going forward, shocking positional play defensively. Petulance could have seen him sent off
    Morgan: 6. Nothing happened for him today
    Dobson: 7, same old dobo 
    Fraser: 8, don't understand why he was taken off and Morgan stayed on
    Rak-Sakyi: 5, welcome to
    mens football
    Stockley: 6. Hold up play was okay, lacked composure in front of goal
    Kirk: 6, we didn't get him on the ball
    Payne: 6, no real impact
    Leaburn: 7, looks good apart from when he did his Carl impression and fell over
    Referee: 3, lost it second half

    CB-T: n/a
    Henry: n/a looks a good prospect 
  • edited August 2022
    Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 5.5
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 6.5
    Morgan: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 7.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 6.5
    Stockley: 6.5
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6.5
    Leaburn: 7
    Referee: 4
  • edited August 2022
    Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 6.5
    Inniss: 3
    O'Connell: 6
    Clayden: 5.5
    Morgan: 4
    Dobson: 5.5
    Fraser: 6
    Rak-Sakyi: 6
    Stockley: 5
    Kirk: 5.5
    Payne: 5.5
    Leaburn: 5.5
    Referee: 4

    CB-T: n/a
    Henry: n/a
  • edited August 2022
    Wollacott:  7.5
    Clare: 6.5
    Inniss: 6
    O'Connell: 6.5
    Clayden: 6
    Morgan: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 7.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 6.5
    Stockley: 6.5
    Kirk: 7
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 4.5
  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 6.5
    O'Connell: 6.5
    Clayden: 5.5
    Morgan: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 7.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 5.5
    Stockley: 5.5
    Kirk: 5.5
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 5.5

    CB-T: n/a
    Henry: n/a
  • Sponsored links:


  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 6.5
    Inniss: 5.5
    O'Connell: 6.5 
    Clayden: 6.5
    Morgan: 5.5
    Dobson: 6.5
    Fraser: 7
    Rak-Sakyi: 6 
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6.5
    Leaburn: 6.5
    Referee:2.5 (and he still won't be the worst we get this season)
  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 7
    O'Connell: 7 
    Clayden: 8
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 9
    Fraser: 8
    Rak-Sakyi: 7 
    Stockley: 7
    Kirk: 7
    Payne: 7 
    Leaburn: 7 
    Referee: 4
  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 6
    Inniss: 5.5
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 6.5
    Morgan: 6.5
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 7.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 6.5
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 3
  • edited August 2022
    Wollacott: 7.5
    Clare: 7.5
    Inniss: 6
    O'Connell:7.5 
    Clayden: 7
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 8
    Fraser: 8
    Rak-Sakyi: 6.5 
    Stockley: 6 
    Kirk: 7
    Payne: 7
    Leaburn: 6.5
    Referee: 4
  • edited August 2022
    Wollacott:  6.5 
    Clare:  6.5 
    Inniss:  6 
    O'Connell:  6.5 
    Clayden:  5.5 
    Morgan:  5.5 
    Dobson:  5.5
    Fraser:  5 
    Rak-Sakyi:  6 
    Stockley:  5.5
    Kirk:  6
    Payne:  5.5 
    Leaburn:  6
    Referee:  6
  • edited August 2022
    Wol 7
    clayd 7
    O’Connell 7
    innis 6
    Clare 7 

    morgan 6
    fraser 7.5
    dobbo 7

    Rak 7 
    stockley 6
    kirk 6 
  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 6
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 5
    Morgan: 6
    Dobson: 6
    Fraser: 7.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 5
    Stockley: 5
    Kirk: 5
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 4

    CB-T: n/a
    Henry: n/a
  • Wollacott: 7.5
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 5 - really like him but he's a liability with his feet and loses his cool trying to make up for it, started their goal
    O'Connell: 7 - up to speed now
    Clayden: 6.5
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 7 - man marked first half
    Fraser: 8 - MOM
    Rak-Sakyi: 5 - over-confident then lost confidence, then didn't cover for Clare when he was covering for Innis; should have been on the bench after Tuesday night's exertions and cramp
    Stockley: 6 - not a striker 
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6.5
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee:4 - lost control once they came out to kick us off the park section half
  • Wollacott: 7 - a relatively quiet afternoon (much like his opposite number). A very good save in the lead up to their goal but unfortunately his defenders didn’t react to the loose ball
    Clare: 6.5 - got skinned once but good in possession and some good sweeping balls out to the left flank. Needs to cut down on the yellows, as maybe only 2 off a suspension?
    Inniss: 4.5 - Cambridge were (doubtless on instructions) very happy for him to have the ball and his unsuccessful foray upfield led to their equaliser. Just as well the ref and his linos didn’t spot his unprovoked assault on the Cambridge midfielder. Less teams are playing aerially these days and I much prefer Lavelle 
    O'Connell: 6.5 - solid
    Clayden: 6 - showed his inexperience on occasions but a tenacious and pacy player
    Morgan: 6 - his quietest game of the season
    Dobson: 7 - his covering, tackles and interceptions were important when Cambridge took control in the second half
    Fraser: 7.5: MOTM - by far our best player in the first half. 
    Rak-Sakyi: 5.5 - a difficult afternoon and passed up a couple of good crossing opportunities. Will be a real asset for us, though
    Stockley: 6 - he was well marshalled and the service to him was not good, although he was unable to get his two opportunities on target.
    Kirk: 6 - unable to build on Tuesday’s performance
    Payne: 6 - lively and takes up some good positions. Hopefully he’ll start at Walsall and build up some momentum 
    Leaburn: 6 - livened things up as we went more direct towards the end. 
    Referee: 4 - really poor. Failed to play the advantage (for both sides) and got a number of decisions wrong, which contributed to the game becoming a little fractious. It didn’t  ultimately affect the result and I think Ben Garner allowed his frustration to get the better of him in his post-match comments
  • Wollacott: 8
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 7
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 7
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 7
    Rak-Sakyi: 6
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 5
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 5
  • Sponsored links:


  • Wollacott: 6
    Clare: 6.5
    Inniss: 4
    O'Connell: 7.5
    Clayden: 7
    Morgan: 7.5
    Dobson: 6.5
    Fraser: 7
    Rak-Sakyi: 5
    Stockley: 6.5
    Kirk: 7
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 6
  • your marks please:

    Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 5
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 7
    Morgan: 7
    Dobson: 5
    Fraser: 7
    Rak-Sakyi: 6
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 2

    CB-T: n/a
    Henry: n/a



  • Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 6.5 Gets found out defensively when alongside Inniss
    Inniss: 5.5 Cambridge forwards pressed him and he slowed things down
    O'Connell: 7 Looked competent 
    Clayden: 6.5 Busy first half going forward but caught out in defence
    Morgan: 6 Played a lot of first half as left back - appeared to put him off his rhythm
    Dobson: 7.5 
    Fraser: 7
    Rak-Sakyi: 6 Maybe this division is not so easy
    Stockley: 6 Fluffed his lines again in front of goal
    Kirk: 6
    Payne: 6 
    Leaburn: 6.5 
    Referee: 3 Was played well by the Cambridge defenders

    CB-T: n/a
    Henry: n/a
  • Wollacott:  7
    Clare:        7
    Inniss:       5
    O'Connell:  6
    Clayden:  6
    Morgan:  6
    Dobson: 6
    Fraser:     7
    Rak-Sakyi: 6
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee:  4
  • Wollacott: 6.5
    Clare: 6
    Inniss: 4
    O'Connell: 6
    Clayden: 5.5
    Morgan: 5.5
    Dobson: 6
    Fraser: 6.5
    Rak-Sakyi: 5
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6
    Payne: 6
    Leaburn: 6
  • At the game

    Wollacott: 7 Very unlucky to concede after great initial save. Continues to look very solid.
    Clare: 6 Not at the races today, and poor by his standards.
    Inniss: 6 Did OK I thought, apart from the goal, but prefer Lavelle.
    O'Connell: 7 Our best defender today. Looked decent.
    Clayden: 6 Did OK again. Forms a good partnership with Kirk, and a threat going forwards. Needs to work on his defensive play.
    Morgan: 6 The Morgan of last year. Went missing for chunks of the game, and passing and dead ball delivery was off.
    Dobson: 7 Decent as usual. Some have commented about him being slow to release the ball, but I think part of the problem yesterday was that his two midfield partners were often too far away for the simple pass. This wasn't the case against Plymouth, so presumably instructed to play this way by Garner?
    Fraser: 8 MOM. Played very well. Looked skillful on the ball and linked play well. Surprised that he was playing so advanced for most of the game. Not sure why he was substituted rather than Morgan.
    Rak-Sakyi: 6 Didn't really have much of the ball, and was heavily marked when he did.
    Stockley: 6 How many chances does he need to put the ball in the net? Desperately needs a goal from open play. Works hard though and still important to the team.
    Kirk: 6 Not as good as Tuesday (like most of the team), but still looks decent.
    Payne: 6 Looked OK and we upped the tempo when him and Miles came on.
    Leaburn: 6 Looked OK.

    Referee:4 Kermit the Frog. Tried his best to spoil the game. Lost the plot in second half. Not very good.

    CB-T: n/a  Oh dear! I hope the injury isn't too bad.
    Henry: n/a Looked lively for his cameo.
  • edited August 2022
    Wollacott: 7
    Clare: 7
    Inniss: 5.5
    O'Connell: 7
    Clayden: 6.5
    Morgan: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Fraser: 7.5 
    Rak-Sakyi: 6
    Stockley: 6
    Kirk: 6.5
    Payne: 6.5
    Leaburn: 6
    Referee: 3
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!