Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

January Transfer Window - Jan 2023 (Deadline Day starts page 112)

1…106107109111112…173

Comments

  • BenHaimandBikey
    BenHaimandBikey Posts: 508
    edited January 2023
    Callumcafc said:

    Considering he played in a v dominant Bournemouth side this is v underwhelming.

    Hopefully, he'll look better with the Covered End roaring him on with their unmitigated support. 
  • DDOUBLEE
    DDOUBLEE Posts: 1,473
    RonnieMoore said:
    Bailey said:
    If we manage to off load DJ, Thomas, Kirk and Aneke, I think this will be a massively successful window by virtue of the fact, we were right all along, they are shit !
    Aneke no going anywhere 
    I wish you would 
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,881
    edited January 2023
    Sale of Stockley & others is more likely to prove working capital for EFL for the potless & useless Methvin takeover. Its clear Sandgaard wants shot of the club & prepared to hoike it off  Methven, who have no apparent plan to cut the Academy & cull the playing stuff, so that they can prove running costs. 
    Sandgaard is clearly clueless.The Methven takeover is a sorry, cash strapped shambles too imo. 
  • cafcwill
    cafcwill Posts: 1,286
    My predictions for tomorrow 

    - Bwp announced as last minute free

    - Burstow loan collapses due to sandgaard insisting he pays the fee in the form of a song

    - No other strikers arrive

    - Matt Smith signs on loan
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    Bailey said:
    If we manage to off load DJ, Thomas, Kirk and Aneke, I think this will be a massively successful window by virtue of the fact, we were right all along, they are shit !
    DJ played for Under 21 today, unlikely to be going. Doubt if Aneke going, the other two very possible 
  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,164
    According to one source we've gone from signed to now being interested in Kill Kenny!
  • Red_Chester
    Red_Chester Posts: 745
    sillav nitram said:
    According to one source we've gone from signed to now being interested in Kill Kenny!
    Depends what the agreement is with stoke. I assume Bournemouth have a release clause but I’d assume stoke are currently paying more of his wages than we will. However, more likely to get game time with us. 
  • MrBurns
    MrBurns Posts: 1,285
    edited January 2023
    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/update-following-closure-transfer-window will the sandman post a similar update tomorrow evening 
  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,164
    Red_Chester said:
    sillav nitram said:
    According to one source we've gone from signed to now being interested in Kill Kenny!
    Depends what the agreement is with stoke. I assume Bournemouth have a release clause but I’d assume stoke are currently paying more of his wages than we will. However, more likely to get game time with us. 
    I'm referring to mixed messages from the media and why everything that comes out of the media, needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,628
    Callumcafc said:
    ".....and we have other options up front"

    Yeah right, not when the only 2 fit ones get injured or sent off next week.

    Back to where we were last August. No lessons learnt at all. 

    And what happened to the "players will leave when surplus to requirements". 30 hours to go to bring in a proper "fill yer boots" striker. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,038
    I can only assume Mr Scott's recruitment appointment took in outgoings as well.  

  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    vff said:
    Sale of Stockley & others is more likely to prove working capital for EFL for the potless & useless Methvin takeover. Its clear Sandgaard wants shot of the club & prepared to hoike it off  Methven, who have no apparent plan to cut the Academy & cull the playing stuff, so that they can prove running costs. 
    Sandgaard is clearly clueless.The Methven takeover is a sorry, cash strapped shambles too imo. 
    Not sure I’m reading your post correctly, but are you saying the buyer could be Methven? It can’t be, surely. He hasn’t got the resources to lose millions running the club. There has to be backers behind the takeover, otherwise it’s all just a ridiculous waste of time. 
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,985
    edited January 2023
    Has to be another striker coming in now Stockley has gone. Otherwise this will smack of cost cutting
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    DubaiCAFC said:
    Scoham said:
    We’re set to miss out on Luke Plange.

    https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/lincoln-city-set-to-beat-barnsley-and-charlton-in-the-race-for-crystal-palace-forward/
    I think this is the guy the @Swisdom mentioned a few days back, about the player that is playing a different position.
    Luke Plange was the one we were keen on.  Not exactly ripping up trees at Molenbeek but he’s a talented lad.  They are playing him as a centre forward but it’s felt he is better suited as a second striker.
    shame we miss out if indeed we have as I quite liked the look of him
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Those stats for Kilkenny strike me as another Josh Cullen-type.

    we can only but dream

    reviews I’ve seen online seem to suggest he is very highly regarded at Bournemouth.  Presumably Holden knows his game and liked what he saw
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    edited January 2023
    Valley11 said:
    Has to be another striker coming in now Stockley has gone. Otherwise this will smack of cost cutting
    Bonne was the Stockley replacement 


    Which is funny because Stockley was the delayed Bonne replacement
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Callumcafc said:
    Valley11 said:
    Has to be another striker coming in now Stockley has gone. Otherwise this will smack of cost cutting
    Bonne was the Stockley replacement 


    Which is funny because Stockley was the delayed Bonne replacement
    Davison was the Aneke replacement who was in turn replaced by Aneke.
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,514
    As it stands, we're getting rid of deadwood / high wage earners who can't get in the team
    That is acceptable

    Ending up with less numbers in the squad than we started with (and one of the incomings is sidelined through injury) is not acceptable.

    We will never learn our lessons.   Well, sorry.... TS won't learn his lessons.   He doesn't want to spend another penny, but wants £11m for the club.

    I want to give up.

    I really do.
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,353
    Prepare for following lifers...


  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,266
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,514
    sam3110 said:
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
    because we don't trust the current ownership to actually do that.   They didn't with Washington.   They will sell Leaburn to balance the books, Bonne will leave.   Kanu up front on his own next year you say?....!
  • Sir Chrissy
    Sir Chrissy Posts: 609
    Wollacott moving on being banded around again. Doesn't want to fight for N1 spot
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,405
    Our transfer planning is that bad, I wish we kept Davison as a runner.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    sam3110 said:
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
    Because the liklihood is that neither of this will happen. 

    The conversation will then become about how expensive strikers are and that we can't afford it. 
  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,420
    LargeAddick said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Who the hell is Mansfield?
    It’s as annoying as SethPlum constantly calling someone Methadone.
    Not as upset as our resident hard man Burger boy gets every time someone calls him Burger boy on the forum.
     Doh, now I’ve done it! 😂
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,883
    soapy_jones said:
    Prepare for following lifers...


    Is this the guess the question game? I'll go first!

    millwall have won
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,168
    Callumcafc said:
    Valley11 said:
    Has to be another striker coming in now Stockley has gone. Otherwise this will smack of cost cutting
    Bonne was the Stockley replacement 


    Which is funny because Stockley was the delayed Bonne replacement

  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,168
    sam3110 said:
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
    Having only Stockley fit was one of the things that got us into a situation where relegation was looking a real possibility. We aren't safe yet and another injury to Leaburn could leave us with just Bonne who is quicker than Stockley but didn't look any more effective on Saturday, and a potentially 1/4 fit Chuks. There's no need to break the budget on a permanent, but a sensible loan signing might be prudent.  
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,496
    Stockley fee was 250,000 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,628
    RonnieMoore said:
    Stockley fee was 250,000 
    Decent business if we then use the money (plus a bit more) on a replacement striker. But this time one that actually scores. 

Categories

“Marketplace”