Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

January Transfer Window - Jan 2023 (Deadline Day starts page 112)

1106107109111112173

Comments

  • edited January 2023

    Considering he played in a v dominant Bournemouth side this is v underwhelming.

    Hopefully, he'll look better with the Covered End roaring him on with their unmitigated support. 
  • vffvff
    edited January 2023
    Sale of Stockley & others is more likely to prove working capital for EFL for the potless & useless Methvin takeover. Its clear Sandgaard wants shot of the club & prepared to hoike it off  Methven, who have no apparent plan to cut the Academy & cull the playing stuff, so that they can prove running costs. 
    Sandgaard is clearly clueless.The Methven takeover is a sorry, cash strapped shambles too imo. 
  • Bailey said:
    If we manage to off load DJ, Thomas, Kirk and Aneke, I think this will be a massively successful window by virtue of the fact, we were right all along, they are shit !
    DJ played for Under 21 today, unlikely to be going. Doubt if Aneke going, the other two very possible 
  • According to one source we've gone from signed to now being interested in Kill Kenny!
  • According to one source we've gone from signed to now being interested in Kill Kenny!
    Depends what the agreement is with stoke. I assume Bournemouth have a release clause but I’d assume stoke are currently paying more of his wages than we will. However, more likely to get game time with us. 
  • edited January 2023
    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/update-following-closure-transfer-window will the sandman post a similar update tomorrow evening 
  • According to one source we've gone from signed to now being interested in Kill Kenny!
    Depends what the agreement is with stoke. I assume Bournemouth have a release clause but I’d assume stoke are currently paying more of his wages than we will. However, more likely to get game time with us. 
    I'm referring to mixed messages from the media and why everything that comes out of the media, needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.
  • Sponsored links:


  • I can only assume Mr Scott's recruitment appointment took in outgoings as well.  

  • vff said:
    Sale of Stockley & others is more likely to prove working capital for EFL for the potless & useless Methvin takeover. Its clear Sandgaard wants shot of the club & prepared to hoike it off  Methven, who have no apparent plan to cut the Academy & cull the playing stuff, so that they can prove running costs. 
    Sandgaard is clearly clueless.The Methven takeover is a sorry, cash strapped shambles too imo. 
    Not sure I’m reading your post correctly, but are you saying the buyer could be Methven? It can’t be, surely. He hasn’t got the resources to lose millions running the club. There has to be backers behind the takeover, otherwise it’s all just a ridiculous waste of time. 
  • Those stats for Kilkenny strike me as another Josh Cullen-type.

    we can only but dream

    reviews I’ve seen online seem to suggest he is very highly regarded at Bournemouth.  Presumably Holden knows his game and liked what he saw
  • As it stands, we're getting rid of deadwood / high wage earners who can't get in the team
    That is acceptable

    Ending up with less numbers in the squad than we started with (and one of the incomings is sidelined through injury) is not acceptable.

    We will never learn our lessons.   Well, sorry.... TS won't learn his lessons.   He doesn't want to spend another penny, but wants £11m for the club.

    I want to give up.

    I really do.
  • Prepare for following lifers...


  • Sponsored links:


  • sam3110 said:
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
    because we don't trust the current ownership to actually do that.   They didn't with Washington.   They will sell Leaburn to balance the books, Bonne will leave.   Kanu up front on his own next year you say?....!
  • Wollacott moving on being banded around again. Doesn't want to fight for N1 spot
  • Our transfer planning is that bad, I wish we kept Davison as a runner.
  • sam3110 said:
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
    Because the liklihood is that neither of this will happen. 

    The conversation will then become about how expensive strikers are and that we can't afford it. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Who the hell is Mansfield?
    It’s as annoying as SethPlum constantly calling someone Methadone.
    Not as upset as our resident hard man Burger boy gets every time someone calls him Burger boy on the forum.
     Doh, now I’ve done it! 😂
  • Prepare for following lifers...


    Is this the guess the question game? I'll go first!

    millwall have won
  • sam3110 said:
    We are a weird bunch aren't we? Getting rid of Stockley isn't a "cost cutting exercise", he was shit, has been all season and we got rid of him for a fee instead of letting his contract run out, a win win in my eyes. 

    We aren't going up, we aren't going down, what's the point in paying over the odds for a striker now when we can actually plan ahead and get one in the summer? Get a lad in on loan to fill the hole for now and finish the season. 
    Having only Stockley fit was one of the things that got us into a situation where relegation was looking a real possibility. We aren't safe yet and another injury to Leaburn could leave us with just Bonne who is quicker than Stockley but didn't look any more effective on Saturday, and a potentially 1/4 fit Chuks. There's no need to break the budget on a permanent, but a sensible loan signing might be prudent.  
  • Stockley fee was 250,000 
    Decent business if we then use the money (plus a bit more) on a replacement striker. But this time one that actually scores. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!