Is it political to mention that the UK wants and is poised to rejoin the EU scientific Horizon scheme and get part of the £85 billion available?
Is re joining such a scheme and working in harmony with the Netherlands, Austria, France, Malta, Belgium, Germany, Bulgaria, Greece, Poland, Croatia, Hungary, Portugal, Cyprus, Republic of Ireland, Romania, Czech Republic, Italy, Slovakia, Denmark, Latvia, Slovenia, Estonia, Lithuania, Spain, Finland, Luxembourg and Sweden the wrong thing to do because it is anti democratic when after all the 2016 referendum was framed in some quarters of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland not needing them as much as they need us?
Will scientific cooperation and collaboration help in tackling climate change?
Comments
Heck it might even lead to more general cooperation, like working together to stop the criminal people smuggling gangs.
Are you suggesting the EU actively want to stop or even reduce people smuggling to the UK anyway? Your definitely opening up a political debate by introducing illegal migration into this thread
10:16 - 10:30 4/7
10:31- 10:45 10/11
Preferable to all or nothing
Q - Oh. Why did you leave if you were keen on membership ?
😂
No, need to discuss your questions if you are (only) discussing the advantages of rejoining it. Unless you want to bring the politics or incapable or ringfencing a simple question. Not 'we don't want to talk about that' - no need to talk about that to answer a simple question
Could you discuss advantages with joining it with a country who were considering joining without discussing why the UK left it temporarily? Of course you could. In fact that country would think you were somewhat unhinged if you included historic politics. You'd be akin to Prince Harry using every opportunity to lash out at the RF including his recent series for Netflix.
Could you not discuss the advantages of being in the Championship compared to League One?
When India landed on the Moon it was new news then and was discussed.
For instance, pharma, is pretty much unchanged but this as almost all big and medium pharmaceutical companies have multiple offices in the EU and the US as well as the UK.
I'd imagine a lot of science led companies are the same.
It's a good thing for smaller companies and individuals though, for sure
The new news today is about reversing what the majority apparently voted for, and looking to cooperate and collaborate with the EU as the UK used to do.
Philosophically tricky, but practically good.
While an EU initiative, it does encourage membership from non-EU countries (though, as an EU initiative, dispute resolution is subject to ECJ oversight).
From what I have seen about the agreement, the deal allows the UK to get money back, if it gets less than a set percentage of that value in Horizon-funded projects, but it also allows for the UK having to pay more, if it is more successful.
What academics have identified as a problem is the hostile approach to postgraduate/postdoctorate researchers seeking places in UK institutions (which make them less attractive).
So, today's announcement is good news, but only part of the way towards continuing the high levels of success UK research institutions have achieved to date.
Any of the usual suspects on here who want to bore the arse off of us with their political viewpoints (he yawns...) can crack on, the thread will just get closed down sooner rather than later.