Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Freddie Ladapo - Sept 2024, signed a 2 year deal with Huddersfield (p11)

1567911

Comments

  • Was poor after a few good minutes….would let him go back to Ipswich
  • 2 months and still no sign of improvement.
    Playing devil's advocate but you could argue limited game time 
  • LTKapal said:
    2 months and still no sign of improvement.
    Playing devil's advocate but you could argue limited game time 
    Perhaps he is a good example of not bringing in players with a background of injury/limited immediate time playing football.

  • Been proper rubbish in a Charlton shirt. 100% do not keep next season. 
  • edited March 30
    He’s had his chance to impress and be offered a deal and has shown nothing to make the club consider it worthwhile. Return to sender. 
    Shouldn't be too difficult, address unknown, no such number, no such zone. Thank you, thank you very much🕺😉.
  • Have more faith in a half fit Wickham than Ladapo
  • Sponsored links:


  • Just looks like a typical journeyman that's had more clubs than I've had hot dinners.
     He's an f*******g unit... but offers next to no physicality to our front line. Even shys away from it much of the time.
      
  • Posted on the player marks thread, but despite the stick he was getting from the away end he was actually involved in most of our positive moves 2nd half. Credit where it's due, but he's clearly not the player he was a couple of seasons ago and has been totally underwhelming. Definitely not a player we should be looking at next year.
  • He scored a goal every 120 odd minutes last season for Ipswich. One goal in almost 700 minutes for us. For whatever reason it doesn’t look like it’s working for him here.

    I’m hesitant to write off a historically profilic scorer because we all know what will happen when he comes to the Valley in another team’s colours next season.
  • Charltonised ...
  • NabySarr said:
    Scoham said:
    Anyone else feel our current front two look like something a 10 year old would pick? Look down last seasons L1 top scorers and see who’s available.

    We’ve blatantly needed a striker who can win headers, battle against CBs, hold up the ball and link up with May.

    Instead we’ve gone for another poacher (last season) who also needs to play alongside Aneke or Leaburn to get the most out of him.

    May doesn’t offer those things at all so it’s vital his partner does.

    Tuesday is time to see if Kanu can offer more from the start of the game or if he looks better because he’s up against tiring defenders.

    Have to pray Aneke has a good run of 20/30 minute appearances from the bench.
    Pulling out of the Ikpeazu deal is another to add to the list of really poor decisions made this season 
    So a player suddenly decides he wants more money then been agreed … and you say still buy him ?? 
  • Perhaps he is a good example of why Scott needs to be given a P45.

    And there are many more. Mostly out on loan at other clubs. 
    As usual, hindsight is 20/20 vision.
    Perhaps he is a good example of getting a loan in to see if he is worth it before shelling out for a contract. 
    Now they know he isn't.  But why not throw him in there for games that don't matter.
    Let him get the shit kicking instead of players we value.
  • NabySarr said:
    Scoham said:
    Anyone else feel our current front two look like something a 10 year old would pick? Look down last seasons L1 top scorers and see who’s available.

    We’ve blatantly needed a striker who can win headers, battle against CBs, hold up the ball and link up with May.

    Instead we’ve gone for another poacher (last season) who also needs to play alongside Aneke or Leaburn to get the most out of him.

    May doesn’t offer those things at all so it’s vital his partner does.

    Tuesday is time to see if Kanu can offer more from the start of the game or if he looks better because he’s up against tiring defenders.

    Have to pray Aneke has a good run of 20/30 minute appearances from the bench.
    Pulling out of the Ikpeazu deal is another to add to the list of really poor decisions made this season 
    So a player suddenly decides he wants more money then been agreed … and you say still buy him ?? 
    Apparently due for a promotion bonus if Ipswich are promoted. Can’t blame him for wanting to stay at Ipswich to ensure he gets another promotion bonus. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Yeah.....He's not good enough 
  • He’s been dreadful, send him back 
  • NabySarr said:
    Scoham said:
    Anyone else feel our current front two look like something a 10 year old would pick? Look down last seasons L1 top scorers and see who’s available.

    We’ve blatantly needed a striker who can win headers, battle against CBs, hold up the ball and link up with May.

    Instead we’ve gone for another poacher (last season) who also needs to play alongside Aneke or Leaburn to get the most out of him.

    May doesn’t offer those things at all so it’s vital his partner does.

    Tuesday is time to see if Kanu can offer more from the start of the game or if he looks better because he’s up against tiring defenders.

    Have to pray Aneke has a good run of 20/30 minute appearances from the bench.
    Pulling out of the Ikpeazu deal is another to add to the list of really poor decisions made this season 
    So a player suddenly decides he wants more money then been agreed … and you say still buy him ?? 
    Well we are probably paying more for Ladapo so in hindsight yeah we should have signed Ikpeazu instead 
  • edited April 1
    He really didn't have the desired effect did he.

    You'd think a front line of him Kanu and May would be ripping it up but you couldn't be more wrong.
    Accomodating him meant May was anonymous for much of the game.
    Concerned me a bit that Jones didn't see it earlier.
  • He really didn't have the desired effect did he.

    You'd thing a front line of him Kanu and May would be ripping it up but you couldn't be more wrong.
    Accomodating him meant May was anonymous for much of the game.
    Concerned me a bit that Jones didn't see it earlier.
    I agree, maybe there is some financial thingy that compels Ladapo to play but he hasn't been all that for us.
  • Don't think he was that bad today in a sea of mediocrity, certainly better than a few other cameos he's had. Second half, until he was subbed he was probably our liveliest player
  • Why, why, why is Jones continuing to play this man when he should've been sussed out two months ago. 
  • He really didn't have the desired effect did he.

    You'd think a front line of him Kanu and May would be ripping it up but you couldn't be more wrong.
    Accomodating him meant May was anonymous for much of the game.
    Concerned me a bit that Jones didn't see it earlier.
    I was very surprised he didn’t take off Kanu when Bakinson came on to let May have 20 mins or so up top with Chuks 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!