He's also benched Ugarte who was supposedly the missing piece they needed in midfield and he's starting Eriksen instead. It's like he's given up and just wants the sack and a pay off now
He's also benched Ugarte who was supposedly the missing piece they needed in midfield and he's starting Eriksen instead. It's like he's given up and just wants the sack and a pay off now
Ugarte: You despise me don't you boss Ten Hag: If I gave you any thought I probably would
Went to pick up my daughter from a birthday party and by the time I got back I saw Wellbeck getting the third.
That was a capitulation for the ages!
I watched the whole game and it really was the old classic game of two half's. Spurs looked quality in the 1st half and just fell to pieces in the 2nd.
Watched the end of the golf cos couldn’t watch with spurs 0-2 up , golf finished nowt else to watch and that beauty of a second half arrives , loved it . The sheer weight of Spurs knowing Arsenal are gonna win the Premier League crushed spurs , give the gooner cnuts the title now , it’s done ffs
Went to pick up my daughter from a birthday party and by the time I got back I saw Wellbeck getting the third.
That was a capitulation for the ages!
I watched the whole game and it really was the old classic game of two half's. Spurs looked quality in the 1st half and just fell to pieces in the 2nd.
It's probably the most typical Spurs performance you'll get. First half look like a side who could challenge for the title, and then in the second half look like a relegation battler.
Awful mistake from Udogie for the first Brighton goal that gives them hope. And whoever it was (Bentancur?) for the third goal has to show more desire to dive in and block the cross to Welbeck.
Ange must be tearing his hair out, he's set his side up to come away with a good win and terrible individual mistakes have somehow meant they lost.
The most important thing to know is that it's nothing to do with the 115 charges.
In essence, the idea of the ATP rules is to stop clubs being able to hide owners providing cash injections via sponsorships. They were brought in to stop state owned clubs using state owned companies to pay over the odds sponsorship deals. Real analysis will come in a few days as the document is 175 pages long, any journalist with a definitive view is probably being fed information from one side to spin. In seems like City won on a few points but the PL have won bigger, they just aren't selling it well. The framework and idea of the ATP rules are supported, the way they are written and applied is where City have won. They just need to be rewritten and then likely voted on by the PL.
Interesting to see which clubs were witnesses for City and Premier League.
City - Chelsea, Newcastle, Everton PL - Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Brighton, West Ham
Also interesting to look at their (assumed) motivations
City - Chelsea: Hedgefunders with lots of companies but who can never get a shirt sponsor, Newcastle: State owned, Everton: Mid takeover but previously effectively owned by one Russian bloke in the background
PL - Man Utd: Billionaire who mainly cost cuts, Liverpool: Americans who don't like to put their own money in, Arsenal: Americans who didn't invest for a long time, Spurs: Team with a lot of income from outside of football ventures (NFL, concerts etc.) & transfer income, Brighton: Great in the transfer market - best profits in the league, West Ham: don't know enough but up for sale?
Anyone else think that Bournemouth to be relegated at 12/1 (16.5 on Betfair) might be a bit of value? Yes I am fully aware that Southampton, Leicester and Ipswich are nailed on to be in the dogfight and that the likes of Wolves, Palace and Everton could be in the melting pot too but Bournemouth did lose 19 goal Solanke and the 8 points they secured were at home to Southampton (3) and Newcastle (1) and away to Everton (3) and Forest (1). The draw at Forest was as a result of an 87th minute equaliser and the win at Everton was that bizarre game in which the home side capitulated to the extent that they conceded three goals in the final five minutes or so. Bournemouth lost at home to Chelsea and away to Liverpool and Leicester.
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.
Anyone else think that Bournemouth to be relegated at 12/1 (16.5 on Betfair) might be a bit of value? Yes I am fully aware that Southampton, Leicester and Ipswich are nailed on to be in the dogfight and that the likes of Wolves, Palace and Everton could be in the melting pot too but Bournemouth did lose 19 goal Solanke and the 8 points they secured were at home to Southampton (3) and Newcastle (1) and away to Everton (3) and Forest (1). The draw at Forest was as a result of an 87th minute equaliser and the win at Everton was that bizarre game in which the home side capitulated to the extent that they conceded three goals in the final five minutes or so. Bournemouth lost at home to Chelsea and away to Liverpool and Leicester.
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.
Anyone else think that Bournemouth to be relegated at 12/1 (16.5 on Betfair) might be a bit of value? Yes I am fully aware that Southampton, Leicester and Ipswich are nailed on to be in the dogfight and that the likes of Wolves, Palace and Everton could be in the melting pot too but Bournemouth did lose 19 goal Solanke and the 8 points they secured were at home to Southampton (3) and Newcastle (1) and away to Everton (3) and Forest (1). The draw at Forest was as a result of an 87th minute equaliser and the win at Everton was that bizarre game in which the home side capitulated to the extent that they conceded three goals in the final five minutes or so. Bournemouth lost at home to Chelsea and away to Liverpool and Leicester.
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.
Comments
Ten Hag: If I gave you any thought I probably would
Went to pick up my daughter from a birthday party and by the time I got back I saw Wellbeck getting the third.
That was a capitulation for the ages!
Spurs looked quality in the 1st half and just fell to pieces in the 2nd.
The sheer weight of Spurs knowing Arsenal are gonna win the Premier League crushed spurs , give the gooner cnuts the title now , it’s done ffs
Awful mistake from Udogie for the first Brighton goal that gives them hope. And whoever it was (Bentancur?) for the third goal has to show more desire to dive in and block the cross to Welbeck.
Ange must be tearing his hair out, he's set his side up to come away with a good win and terrible individual mistakes have somehow meant they lost.
So... I'm still none the wiser.
Anyone got the laymans guide to this?!
In essence, the idea of the ATP rules is to stop clubs being able to hide owners providing cash injections via sponsorships. They were brought in to stop state owned clubs using state owned companies to pay over the odds sponsorship deals. Real analysis will come in a few days as the document is 175 pages long, any journalist with a definitive view is probably being fed information from one side to spin. In seems like City won on a few points but the PL have won bigger, they just aren't selling it well. The framework and idea of the ATP rules are supported, the way they are written and applied is where City have won. They just need to be rewritten and then likely voted on by the PL.
I hope that helps a little bit.
PL - Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Brighton, West Ham
Also interesting to look at their (assumed) motivations
City - Chelsea: Hedgefunders with lots of companies but who can never get a shirt sponsor, Newcastle: State owned, Everton: Mid takeover but previously effectively owned by one Russian bloke in the background
PL - Man Utd: Billionaire who mainly cost cuts, Liverpool: Americans who don't like to put their own money in, Arsenal: Americans who didn't invest for a long time, Spurs: Team with a lot of income from outside of football ventures (NFL, concerts etc.) & transfer income, Brighton: Great in the transfer market - best profits in the league, West Ham: don't know enough but up for sale?
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.
Shhhh. Stop giggling at the back there.
This one was a yellow:
Consistency.
Also the referee today decided it was a yellow. Clearly refs don't understand the rules even now.
Anyway, the ball is out wide and theres a bloke in the middle.