A club has decided to spend more than our probable entire summer transfer budget just to not sign a player.
surely the £5m works out to be the loan fee for last season, no?
Just sensationalist journalism again... unless Chelsea were that stupid to negotiate with that clause of course!
Can't blame bad journalists this time, it really was in the deal between the clubs.
Chelsea did not pay a loan fee for the player and covered just half of his reported £300,000-a-week wages.
The Blues had agreed an obligation to buy Sancho for a fee of about 25m if they finished higher than 14th in the Premier League, which they did - or pay to get out of the deal.
So Chelsea presumably don't think he's worth more than £25m, or else they would have bought him and sold him on for a profit. That's quite a fall from grace, considering he's still only 25.
So Chelsea presumably don't think he's worth more than £25m, or else they would have bought him and sold him on for a profit. That's quite a fall from grace, considering he's still only 25.
Sancho apparently turned down a deal at Chelsea as the wages were lower than at United.
Presumably thinks he'll get another loan somewhere with United subsidising the wages meaning he gets paid more than at Chelsea for the next year, then get himself a signing-on fee next year.
Which he's probably right about, but it says a lot about where his career is heading etc than it's hoping for a desperate loan or a gamble on a free transfer - he's still only 25 but hasn't been in an England squad for 3 or 4 years, has only started 20ish league games per season in the last 4 or 5 years.
So Chelsea presumably don't think he's worth more than £25m, or else they would have bought him and sold him on for a profit. That's quite a fall from grace, considering he's still only 25.
Sancho apparently turned down a deal at Chelsea as the wages were lower than at United.
Presumably thinks he'll get another loan somewhere with United subsidising the wages meaning he gets paid more than at Chelsea for the next year, then get himself a signing-on fee next year.
Which he's probably right about, but it says a lot about where his career is heading etc than it's hoping for a desperate loan or a gamble on a free transfer - he's still only 25 but hasn't been in an England squad for 3 or 4 years, has only started 20ish league games per season in the last 4 or 5 years.
There will always be clubs willing to take him. His success in the Bundesliga alone probably ensures at the very least he'll get interest from Germany.
I wonder if he'd be a decent loan signing for Newcastle. They need reinforcements on the right wing and Howe is a manager i think could get the best out of him.
Comments
A club has decided to spend more than our probable entire summer transfer budget just to not sign a player.
Just sensationalist journalism again... unless Chelsea were that stupid to negotiate with that clause of course!
Chelsea did not pay a loan fee for the player and covered just half of his reported £300,000-a-week wages.
The Blues had agreed an obligation to buy Sancho for a fee of about 25m if they finished higher than 14th in the Premier League, which they did - or pay to get out of the deal.
Presumably thinks he'll get another loan somewhere with United subsidising the wages meaning he gets paid more than at Chelsea for the next year, then get himself a signing-on fee next year.
Which he's probably right about, but it says a lot about where his career is heading etc than it's hoping for a desperate loan or a gamble on a free transfer - he's still only 25 but hasn't been in an England squad for 3 or 4 years, has only started 20ish league games per season in the last 4 or 5 years.
I wonder if he'd be a decent loan signing for Newcastle. They need reinforcements on the right wing and Howe is a manager i think could get the best out of him.
It goes to show that Brentford have overtaken United in the League and have a better forward than Man united.