I assume he means the seat belt would have kept him trapped in the front and he wouldn’t have stood a chance, but without it he was ‘free’ to be thrown into the back, away from the impact.
How does that work? Not wearing a seat belt wouldn't somehow teleport you into the back seat?
Might do if the car spun.
That's hit something head on. I'd say if he wasn't wearing a seat belt he'd be dead. Either way, he's already totalled one motor at outrageous speed and told social media it cost him 20 grand a year to insure his car. This might sound insensitive, given the circumstances, but having seen the effects of shit driving first hand, and lost a friend to it when I was younger, I'd say he needs to stop driving like an arsehole. How would people feel if he'd taken another motor out instead of a tree of whatever it was he hit?
Wearing a seat belt, not wearing a seat belt, driving like an arsehole because he has history. I’m guessing with the exception of a small number of emergency service personnel, nobody knows what actually happened at this stage
Whatever happened, speeding, seatbelt or no seatbelt, swerved to avoid a cat, he's a very very lucky man to escape alive. That car is absolutely mangled.
I dont understand why nowdays it's a "road traffic accident". Looks to me like there was no other "traffic". Different if you're in a collision with another car or on a motorway accident.
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
Do we know that's definitely his car? That looks like a massive shunt, and not a head on one either, as the bonnet is relatively unscathed when compared to the right hand side of the car.
I dont understand why nowdays it's a "road traffic accident". Looks to me like there was no other "traffic". Different if you're in a collision with another car or on a motorway accident.
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
I dont understand why nowdays it's a "road traffic accident". Looks to me like there was no other "traffic". Different if you're in a collision with another car or on a motorway accident.
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
I dont understand why nowdays it's a "road traffic accident". Looks to me like there was no other "traffic". Different if you're in a collision with another car or on a motorway accident.
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
I dont understand why nowdays it's a "road traffic accident". Looks to me like there was no other "traffic". Different if you're in a collision with another car or on a motorway accident.
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
It's not. It's called an RTC "Road Traffic Collision". Used to be RTA, but changed years ago, so as to not presume an accident.
I dont understand why nowdays it's a "road traffic accident". Looks to me like there was no other "traffic". Different if you're in a collision with another car or on a motorway accident.
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
It's not. It's called an RTC "Road Traffic Collision". Used to be RTA, but changed years ago, so as to not presume an accident.
Just round the corner and that road is a winding road I’ve driven down a gazillion times , I’d put myself in the drives at the upper end of speed limits bracket and no one with half a brain cell drives fast along there cos it’s only going to lead to trouble .
Comments
Hopefully he'll make a full recovery, he's always come across well when I've heard him in interviews
Listening v Relaying rumours. Sounds like you've decided to opt for the former now
Also some of the damage done might have been made by rescue services if he had to be cut out of the car.
Used to be RTA, but changed years ago, so as to not presume an accident.