Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Summer 2025 Charlton Athletic Transfer Rumours

1474475476478480

Comments

  • edited 4:51PM
    Southbank said:
    NabySarr said:
    I know we’ve flirted with it this pre-season but I can’t see us going 3-4-2-1. I think that will be an option that is used this season, but Plan A will still be 3-5-2, with Apter out on the right in the Small role 
    Apter is not a defender in any way. He will play last year's TC role
    Played games as a Wing Back for Blackpool

    https://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/sport/football/blackpool-fc/rob-apters-position-in-the-blackpool-xi-explained-following-influential-display-ahead-of-stockport-county-test-4742437
  • cabbles said:
    Ahadme leaving is a real bonus - I thought we would have to take a hit on the wages and loan him out for at least this season.  As much as he’s an honest pro, i genuinely couldn’t care less whether or not he goes on to have a decent career.  Sick of seeing crap-mediocre players over the last 5/6 years and he’s very much up there with the Gilbey’s etc


    Is he expected to leave on a permanent? 

    We could well still be taking a hit on his wages if it’s a loan to Bolton.
    Perhaps a free transfer may be to all parties interest?
  • I'm optimistic Kelman will sign today as long as he's passed the medical.
    I don't know why this wasn't announced on Friday, but who cares?
  • NabySarr said:
    Is this the most we’ve ever spent in a transfer window? Or do the PL days beat it 
    Once you factor in signing on fees I'd guess the Premier League days were still higher.
  • Apter won’t be playing as a wing-back — I see him as direct competition for TC. Let the best man win
  • Apter won’t be playing as a wing-back — I see him as direct competition for TC. Let the best man win
    Only one winner there mate
  • ButtleJR said:


    would be happy with this against Watford!  Few headaches in there. 
    Can’t see Tanto not starting 
    Leaburn is nowhere near match fit. Knibbs has not signed for us (although I agree he would be a good 10) and Apter is not a RWB.
  • Southbank said:
    ButtleJR said:


    would be happy with this against Watford!  Few headaches in there. 
    Can’t see Tanto not starting 
    Leaburn is nowhere near match fit. Knibbs has not signed for us (although I agree he would be a good 10) and Apter is not a RWB.
    Also think Doc will play 
  • Sponsored links:


  • AndyG said:
    Apter won’t be playing as a wing-back — I see him as direct competition for TC. Let the best man win
    Only one winner there mate
    I agree
  • Apter is a spa RWB
  • If Apter isn’t going to play out on the right (he definitely is) then who else is going to play there? 

  • edited 5:11PM
    NabySarr said:
    Southbank said:
    NabySarr said:
    I know we’ve flirted with it this pre-season but I can’t see us going 3-4-2-1. I think that will be an option that is used this season, but Plan A will still be 3-5-2, with Apter out on the right in the Small role 
    Apter is not a defender in any way. He will play last year's TC role
    I’m guessing you haven’t tuned into any of our pre-season games? Where Apter has played on the right in the role Small played last year 

    We lost a player with the ability to take players on and get us up the pitch. We’ve replaced with a player who can do that and hopefully add the finishing touch. That role isn’t a defender anyway, like when Small played it, it’s probably closer to a right midfielder (where Apter played for Blackpool) than Right wing back 
    Given we are likely to be under a lot more pressure this season than last, whoever is at RWB will need to do a fair amount of defending. Remember Small was a defender we pushed further up the pitch. It won't be Apter. It will be more like Edwards on the other side, a defender who can go forward. 
    I think the tendency here is to try to get all the new players into the first 11. I see it as a 20 man matchday squad (9 subs remember) with few playing 90 minutes apart from the back 4 ( back 3+goalie) and maybe Coventry 
  • Southbank said:
    NabySarr said:
    Southbank said:
    NabySarr said:
    I know we’ve flirted with it this pre-season but I can’t see us going 3-4-2-1. I think that will be an option that is used this season, but Plan A will still be 3-5-2, with Apter out on the right in the Small role 
    Apter is not a defender in any way. He will play last year's TC role
    I’m guessing you haven’t tuned into any of our pre-season games? Where Apter has played on the right in the role Small played last year 

    We lost a player with the ability to take players on and get us up the pitch. We’ve replaced with a player who can do that and hopefully add the finishing touch. That role isn’t a defender anyway, like when Small played it, it’s probably closer to a right midfielder (where Apter played for Blackpool) than Right wing back 
    Given we are likely to be under a lot more pressure this season than last, whoever is at RWB will need to do a fair amount of defending. Remember Small was a defender we pushed further up the pitch. It won't be Apter. It will be more like Edwards on the other side, a defender who can go forward. 
    I think the tendency here is to try to get all the new players into the first 11. I see it as a 20 man matchday squad (9 subs remember) with few playing 90 minutes apart from the back 4.
    I guess we’ll see but that’s where he’ll play.
  • Apter won’t be playing as a wing-back — I see him as direct competition for TC. Let the best man win
    I think that’s why Tanto’s here.

    Great to have much better depth on paper. We should be able to bring on multiple attacking threats off the bench without weakening the team.
  • Southbank said:
    NabySarr said:
    Southbank said:
    NabySarr said:
    I know we’ve flirted with it this pre-season but I can’t see us going 3-4-2-1. I think that will be an option that is used this season, but Plan A will still be 3-5-2, with Apter out on the right in the Small role 
    Apter is not a defender in any way. He will play last year's TC role
    I’m guessing you haven’t tuned into any of our pre-season games? Where Apter has played on the right in the role Small played last year 

    We lost a player with the ability to take players on and get us up the pitch. We’ve replaced with a player who can do that and hopefully add the finishing touch. That role isn’t a defender anyway, like when Small played it, it’s probably closer to a right midfielder (where Apter played for Blackpool) than Right wing back 
    Given we are likely to be under a lot more pressure this season than last, whoever is at RWB will need to do a fair amount of defending. Remember Small was a defender we pushed further up the pitch. It won't be Apter. It will be more like Edwards on the other side, a defender who can go forward. 
    I think the tendency here is to try to get all the new players into the first 11. I see it as a 20 man matchday squad (9 subs remember) with few playing 90 minutes apart from the back 4 ( back 3+goalie)
    In some games we will need a more defensive option (which it looks like we are trying to bring in) and then Apter can be used further forward. But I would expect the majority of games to see Apter in that role, like he is playing it in pre-season 
  • No way will Apter will be in the TC role up front, he's not a back to goal player. Not that TC is amazing at that either to be fair but he does a job.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited 5:12PM
    Bailey said:
    wmcf123 said:
    TeeC said:
    wmcf123 said:
    Talal said:
    NabySarr said:
    Is this the most we’ve ever spent in a transfer window? Or do the PL days beat it 
    We had that window under Dowie where we spent a lot... On shit
    Couple of legends at bargain prices what you talking about 


    Jesus . Two of the worst players ever to put the shirt on . Dowie should have been locked up !
    I will never understand giving Dowie more money in one summer than Curbs had had combined pretty much. 
    Didn't Curbs see Murray after that window, and jokingly complain that he never got given those sort of funds?
    They were all crap apart from Carson too, and yes I include the perennially unfit and overweight, albeit very talented Andy Reid in that 
    Andy Reid was most certainly not crap. Wonderful footballer. Gets in pretty much any charlton team over the past 20 years.
    He was hugely overweight in the premier league and hardly played.  Good in the championship until he wanted to move in January.  Talented, yes . 
    This is probably not helping the discussion, but, yes Dowie was a shit manager, but remember Richard Murray's role in all of this. Richard Murray brought someone in to pick the incoming players and deal with the transfers, Billy Davies turned down the Charlton manager position because of this set up, and that set up didn't change under Dowie, it rather suits a certain individual to lay all the blame at Dowie's door, especially when he was the one who employed him, much to the annoyance and against the advice of fellow directors.   
    Strongly hinted by Murray that George Graham had applied for the job, that would have been a good appointment.

    We should have kept Dowie as he was slowly turning things around.
  • Second one is suicidal. Would mean out of possession Asiimwe was playing RCB and Tanto RWB, Carey at LWB and Berry as an 8
  • Reading fan talking about Knibbs pressing ability for 11 minutes. Makes a change from the usual skills, goals and assists videos. https://youtu.be/rRnHdMP7f8M?si=PzAkTk7WJ7k7R1cT
  • Alfie Doughty off to Millwall reports suggest … having medical tomorrow   
    I read he was going to re-join Rob Edwards at Middlesbrough.
    He got the M right, although 250 miles off track.
  • edited 5:41PM



    I like your First XI, Braziliance. 

    Campbell, Olaofe and Apter will share the two wide spots and all will get plenty of playing time, though Tanto may get the nod more than TC.
  • Gillesphey in a back 4 is a massive no for me. I'd start him, but in a back 5
  • CAFCsayer said:
    Gillesphey in a back 4 is a massive no for me. I'd start him, but in a back 5
    He means in possession, out of possession it would still be a 5 like we did last season 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!