Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Lance Armstrong
Comments
-
Good point. He could.0
-
0
-
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/sports/cycling/armstrong-plans-to-enter-swimming-competition.html?src=recgstonewallpenalty said:won't be co-operating with usada investigation. can he get any lower?
i'm betting yes.0 -
A documentary team followed Armstrong back in 2009, and got very, very lucky... - http://skymovies.sky.com/first-trailer-for-the-armstrong-lie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukOJ_1b-8lQ 0 -
Wow! That film producer sure hit the spot with that one, once-in-a-lifetime timing, can't wait to see it.JiMMy 85 said:A documentary team followed Armstrong back in 2009, and got very, very lucky... - http://skymovies.sky.com/first-trailer-for-the-armstrong-lie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukOJ_1b-8lQ
Really, when you get right down to it, Armstrong is very similar to Bernie Madoff, the whole thing is built on an illusion that nobody wants to see broken.0 -
Rules of the sport no, but if he KNOWINGLY lied to investigators and/or a court he would be. His answers are LEGAL answers, not moral ones. Here in the States, many high profile athletes have used the "I didn't knowingly take the [insert drug name]. I don't know it got there." which is a legal statement in which they could avoid perjury charges later if found out.Rizzo said:
Was it actually a crime though? Against the rules of the sport certainly but might not actually be criminal.nolly said:Proceeds of crime . Time to take that scum to the cleaners
0
