Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Your like/lol/abuse count

1…34689…12

Comments

  • Stone
    Stone Posts: 3,026
    There was this guy who wore a Yellow shirt, yellow shorts, yellow socks and yellow boots. I called him Banana Man and got 3 abuse strikes!
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    edited May 2014
    Wheresmeticket? said:

    Leroy Ambrose said:

    533 Like
    313 LOL
    1 Abuse
    1 Promote

    Feck me, does that mean I'm more likeable than funny?

    Also can't believe I've only got one abuse flag - I would have thought all the dimwitted, Daily Mail reading, knuckle-dragging, UKIP-voting, poor-spelling, right-wing loons on here would be frothing at the mouth to flag me up...

    I already did that one, Leroy. Except I just called everyone a c***.
    Determined to get that count up eh wheresmyticket? ;-)
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,148
    Some of the posts I see get flagged on here do not warrant it.
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,065
    The Red Robin said:

    Some of the posts I see get flagged on here do not warrant it.

    Gave this a LOL, but took it off as I realised it was the Flag I was LOLling at! :-)
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    edited May 2014
    Red Robin did sit that one right up. There's some proper jokers on the site :-)
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,008
    2k like
    1.3k lol
    3 abuse

    Think people laugh at me rather than with me
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,345
    paulie8290 said:

    Like:108
    Lol:55
    Abuse:4
    I upset a few people on saturday lol

    Like:319
    Lol:280
    Abuse:5 Someone joined the party late with that extra abuse
  • RedArmySE7
    RedArmySE7 Posts: 5,407
    Like 42
    Lol 16

    Not bad considering I reckon I've only had 50 odd posts in the last year, quality not quantity folks!
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,888
    Stone said:

    There was this guy who wore a Yellow shirt, yellow shorts, yellow socks and yellow boots. I called him Banana Man and got 3 abuse strikes!

    @Stone I defended you at the time on that one and think got a like off you for it :-)
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,432
    0-promote
    102-like
    85-lol
    9-abuse

    My abuse flags were 1 on saying NLA seems to have a brilliant tattoo artist
    6 on a tongue in cheek 'london is an awful city comment.
    1 on saying 'RIP ronnie Biggs... Dead criminal yay'
    And the only one I can actually understand was mistaking This post r.e Danny green;

    Robbo got zero flags and I got about 12 however the majority were rescinded when I found out that DG was actually doing a really nice thing.
    Robbo on the wing said:

    T.C.E said:

    falconwood_1 said:

    ValleyGary said:

    is there anything Danny Green is good at?

    BALLER!
    oh.
    It seems he's a not a bad fella
    Surprised he got the right house
    Dazzler21 said:

    Lucy had fallen asleep before Danny Green delivered any end product.

    I then had to make the following apology.
    Dazzler21 said:

    T.C.E said:

    Young Lucy is in the last stages of a terminal illness, I'm sure any references to this beautiful young lady in addition to Opinions on Danny Greens footballing skills
    should be kept separate.

    Sorry all wasn't aware of this!
    Apologies for any offence caused by this:
    Dazzler21 said:

    Lucy had fallen asleep before Danny Green delivered any end product.

    Feel a bit of a dick now!
    A few flags were then rescinded.

    I'm not sure how much I agree with flagging at the moment!

  • Sponsored links:



  • CafcCrazy
    CafcCrazy Posts: 808
    26 likes
    30 Lols
    01 abuse

    I received abuse for speaking of the taboo subject that is the CL clique. :(
  • grumpyaddick
    grumpyaddick Posts: 6,597
    246 likes
    282 Lots of loves
    1 completely unjustified abuse flag from the time when I was asked which one in the image was new manager, Jose Riga, and I suggested he was the one with Roland's hand stuck up his arse.

    (The subtle implication that he was Mr Duchatalet's new ventriloquist's dummy proved later to be entirely innacurate but was hardly abusive.)

  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,148
    Friend or Defoe once flagged me for saying their was a pitch inspection at 11am for the Wednesday game. Really?
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,828
    I got a flag for my earwig joke. Strange.
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    AddicksAddict said:

    I got a flag for my earwig joke. Strange.

    What was the earwig joke AA ?
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    edited May 2014
    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,869
    7.59
  • cafcsinger
    cafcsinger Posts: 5,556
    I've got 0 abuse... Go on I dare ya.
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,737
    edited May 2014
    Is an abuse equal to a like?
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,756
    ValleyGary said:

    2k like
    1.3k lol
    3 abuse

    Think people laugh at me rather than with me

    1 promote
    172 likes
    172 lols

    Yeah @ValleyGary we'll call it a draw! :-)

  • Sponsored links:



  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,387
    vff said:

    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.

    Well that is me fecked then. /8 abuses
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    soapy_jones said:

    vff said:

    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.

    Well that is me fecked then. /8 abuses
    Soapy Jones - 514 LOL / 218 likes / 8 abuse

    Soapy Jones - 3378 posts / 218 - 8 = 16

    There is 514 LOL. There must be a way to fit that in.
  • sadiejane1981
    sadiejane1981 Posts: 9,012
    vff said:

    soapy_jones said:

    vff said:

    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.

    Well that is me fecked then. /8 abuses
    Soapy Jones - 514 LOL / 218 likes / 8 abuse

    Soapy Jones - 3378 posts / 218 - 8 = 16

    There is 514 LOL. There must be a way to fit that in.
    What about promotes? Count for anything?
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.
  • sadiejane1981
    sadiejane1981 Posts: 9,012
    vff said:

    Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.

    I have 617 likes and 1 promote (no abuse) but 5000 odd posts so what's the calculation? I have a feeling I'm not going to like this game...
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,869
    Actually, that metric doesn't work. "Likes" etc were only introduced this year, therefore anyone that hasn't just signed up will be disadvantaged and those that have been around since the beginning, more so.
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    sadiejane1981 said:

    vff said:

    Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.

    I have 617 likes and 1 promote (no abuse) but 5000 odd posts so what's the calculation? I have a feeling I'm not going to like this game...
    Well. 5,000 / 617 = 8.1
    The promote should move up to at least 7.1.

    Sadie Jane, the scoring probably would only make good sense as the LOL / Likes have only been around for a while. So maybe many of your comments did not have the opportunity to be appreciated.
  • sadiejane1981
    sadiejane1981 Posts: 9,012
    It's all in good fun I know but there are some amazing posters on here that as lookout said would score quite low because of the high quantity of posts before the feature, it is a fun feature though, other forums have a star rating system, we have points as our equivalent ;-)
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,656
    What's the prize ?
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    ShootersHillGuru said:

    What's the prize ?

    Dinner with Roland
    Charlton Life supporters representative on the board
    and a Charlton Life badge

Categories

“Marketplace”