Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Phil Neville = Rain Man

Doing my swede in...
«13

Comments

  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,716
    He's a very good commentator....
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,443
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    sorry what was that?
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,629
    MOM -the ref

    Wooden spoon - phil neville
  • Leroy Ambrose
    Leroy Ambrose Posts: 14,488
    Phil Neville - a face for radio and a voice for mime.
  • What a dullard
  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,129
    If BBC bosses read the "feedback" on twitter he will already be on the plane home and never be seen on there again
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,929
    I thought he was ok. Rather him than Lawro coming out with the same old cliches and crap all the time. Was impressed with what Rio had to say too.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    About a thousand times better than mark lawrenson aka the most miserable person on the planet. Always has something to moan about.
  • Bangkokaddick
    Bangkokaddick Posts: 4,323
    I'm glad it wasn't just me. High pitched, monotone, unemotional voice. I just switched off whenever he spoke.
  • Michael Owen is worse though.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Bangkokaddick
    Bangkokaddick Posts: 4,323

    I'm going to record Phil Neville's commentary from tonight's match and put it onto my iPod.

    — Boring Tweeter (@b0ringtweets) June 14, 2014
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,230
    Poor old Phil. His brother was a significantly better full back and now he's also a significantly better pundit. Never mind Phil, at least your coaching career is going better than Gary's... oh.
  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,448
    I never thought I'd miss itv sport, the World Cup out here is covered by Indian tv. It's all done in a sky sports way with the presenter and two currant footballers one being Peter Crouch who is taking the Rodney Marsh role, with a nice linen suit no socks and loafers! And the Indian football captain who keeps correcting Crouch on who was playing in the England team alongside him. The interesting bit is when they all stand alongside a huge tv and move the players around, the cameraman has to keep changing focus from Crouch to the Indian captain who appears to be only 5' tall.
  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,231
    T.C.E said:

    two currant footballers

    Two of these? There must be a raisin for it.

    image
    I expected to dislike Phil but actually thought he did okay.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,072
    Comments were ok but delivery was awful.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,822
    Yes, good points but felt more like an open university lecture! It did start to grate a bit I must admit. Strange as his brother is great to listen to.
  • charltonkeston
    charltonkeston Posts: 7,404
    Why do we have to have two commentators?
    I, like most football supporter, know, who has the ball, scored, fouled, offside, etc. They even tell you how many minutes are left, theres a bloody clock in the top corner.
    I know they are only offering their opinion but why do they have to keep stating the bloody obvious?
    I pressed the red button after 30 minutes and turned the commentary off.
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,940
    MrOneLung said:

    Comments were ok but delivery was awful.

    I couldn't have put it better myself.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,072
    Why is your delivery awful too?

    Boom tish.
  • I thought I had a boring voice, but he beats me. It's the way he speaks in clusters of six words that fascinates me. Or, is he a computer that has a number of phrases that are randomly generated throughout the game?

    To be fair, I thought his comments were OK. He will improve.

  • Sponsored links:



  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,582
    They are clearly using him because he sounds a bit like his brother, who is a much better pundit and commentator.

    If only we could have John motson and Clive Tyldesley together, with Gary Lineker, Thierry Henry and Gus Poyet in the studio
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,965
    sam3110 said:


    If only we could have John motson and Clive Tyldesley together, with Gary Lineker, Thierry Henry and Gus Poyet in the studio

    Such is the subjective nature of commentary and punditry that I genuinely can't tell if you're serious or not!
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,228
    He sounded like a monotone, whispering, robot.

    As said previously. What he spoke was probably ok, but he was sooooo boring, I didn't want to listen.
  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,797
    I put up with him for a whole 10 minutes before switching to 5 live commentary........................
  • Blucher
    Blucher Posts: 4,181
    He is certainly monotone but the principal problem for me is that he never shuts up. Some of the content is ok, but he needs to understand that there's no need to fill every silence with inane comments. Maybe he'll get better.
  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 847
    Blucher said:

    Maybe he'll get better.

    Maybe he'll get replaced. After all, the BBC have only taken about 200 journos and pundits to Brazil!
  • I know it was the middle of the night, but a red button kept popping up on the screen, did anyone on here press it and manage to change the commentary?
  • Yh but not HD picture so went back to the shit commentary.
  • Big William
    Big William Posts: 3,864
    Agree that Michael Owen is worse - he should be restricted to the minutes silence whenever there is one before the game.
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,900
    I thought Townsend was bad, in fact I mute the sound if he is commentating but Phil Neville last night....................words fail me :-0