Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Substitutions

2»

Comments

  • [cite]Posted By: Kap10[/cite]I thiought Semedo was awful, if we were making the half time substitution then take him off and bring ZZ into central midfield, Holland was the only player to close down the opposition, what does Semedo do - he receives a ball, takes 2 -3 touches slows down play and half the time gets caught in posession and makes a hurried pass, Ambrois made a couple of good runs, a couple of half decent shots and won a free kick in a dangerous position, despite playing as a winger which he is not, why was Thomas taken off when he was at his most dangerous, he'd even removed the gloves.

    Thank god for Henry,at least now we are out of our misery. Swansea anyone?

    Would disagree with your assessment of Semedo/Holland but I think we agree that we didn't need both of them on the pitch and ZZ for one of them would have been the way to go at half time.
  • bald1
    bald1 Posts: 50
    sums up 2day
  • [cite]Posted By: bald1[/cite]so what are we saying?pardew hasnt got a clue

    On his decisions today, yes.
  • leftbehind
    leftbehind Posts: 8,581
    Ambrose should have stayed and ZZ start
  • [cite]Posted By: leftbehind[/cite]Ambrose should have stayed and ZZ start

    I think ZZ played for China in the week starting with him on the bench was fair enough but why not start with Varney or Thomas on the right and Ambrose in the middle with either Semedo or Holland?
  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,579
    BDL, I'm with you on that one, maybe we could replace pards next season.
  • browny
    browny Posts: 1,091
    With Holland!!!!!!!!
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,413
    the worst sub was bringing varney on with 8 minutes to go. he should've come on earlier or started
  • browny
    browny Posts: 1,091
    I dont think he was ready to start but agree that he should of come on alot earlier.