Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Valley Gold boycott?

1…5678911»

Comments

  • C4FC4L1f3
    C4FC4L1f3 Posts: 1,917
    edited March 2016
    This is a very insightful email - thanks for sharing this! I thought the number of VG members would be higher than 2000 - and am surprised so few have cancelled.
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,728
    C4FC4L1f3 said:

    This is a very insightful email - thanks for sharing this! I thought the number of VG members would be higher than 20 - and am surprised so few have cancelled.

    Don't you mean 2000?
  • C4FC4L1f3
    C4FC4L1f3 Posts: 1,917
    yeah sorry I had 20 on my mind :) Belgium protest fault :)

    I changed it.
  • Slartibartfast
    Slartibartfast Posts: 1,120
    One less now.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,747
    edited March 2016
    I can't see myself holding on for too long. The fact that money has been withheld has kept me in, but I think that response from the scheme doesn't fully echo my perspective. I don't feel like those running the scheme are too bothered about my perspective and the perspective oth others. As I have not contacted them asking for a meeting, I am presumably one of the 98%, but I haven't received an e-mail asking for my views on this - in these unprecedented time. I'm not going to tell others what to do, but I think I know what I have to do. It feels like I'm closing the book!
  • jamescafc
    jamescafc Posts: 1,832
    Only 2000 - makes my lack of jackpot wins even more infuriating!
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    1881 ?
    Pretty certain it is less than that now.
    And, really less than 2% asked for a meeting ?
    (I know the answer). What is 2% of 1881.
    Again, I know the answer, but check the other threads, there was more than enough on there......
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    I have read Matt's reply (thanks for sharing), and the term 'conflicting parties' in the last sentence of the second paragraph says it all really.
    Doesn't sound like 'building a better tomorrow together' to me.
  • rikofold
    rikofold Posts: 4,051
    edited March 2016
    seth plum said:

    I have read Matt's reply (thanks for sharing), and the term 'conflicting parties' in the last sentence of the second paragraph says it all really.
    Doesn't sound like 'building a better tomorrow together' to me.

    Well at the very least it should tell you that there was a sharp disagreement in the meeting and as to what should be subsequently communicated, no?

    As I understand it there were fewer than 30 emails received, and as many of those people have since resigned their membership the percentage is even lower. There were also emails offering the opposite views received.

    The fan reps do tenaciously represent member interests, to the extent the rules and the Gambling Act allow.
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 573
    The odds for winning the top prize are getting better.

  • Sponsored links:



  • TellyTubby
    TellyTubby Posts: 3,553
    mickc said:

    The odds for winning the top prize are getting better.

    Indeed. The top prize of getting shot of Roland means we all win.

Categories

“Marketplace”