Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Surrey ccc

11920222425190

Comments

  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Stumps 543-7.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    Not a good day it seems.

    But with Rampaul, Footit, Meaker and Dernbach all injured and Sam Curran unavailable. We are short on the quick bowler front.

    But knowing this I would have gone with four seamers. Just in case one has an off day (Pillans)
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Century for Paul Collingwood.

    Durham declare on 607-7, Collingwood 106* Carse 30*
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    We need to bat long. Can't see us taking wickets in this match...
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Lunch 31-0. Burns 19* Harinath 11*.
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Harinath lbw b Stokes 18. 41-1.
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Burns c Richardson b Stokes 28. 58-2.

    Eek.
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,735
    edited May 2016
    Oh dear.....

    Would you like me to do a special Kentish rain dance for you ?

    :smile:
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458

    Oh dear.....

    Would you like me to do a special Kentish rain dance for you ?

    :smile:

  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Sangakkara c Borthwick b Stokes 14. 65-3.

    If the offer's still there Fanny...
  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907

    Oh dear.....

    Would you like me to do a special Kentish rain dance for you ?

    :smile:

    Could you please?!
  • Keep going Stokesy...
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    If we lose this I really am fearing for our chances of staying up this season. It looking forward to playing another season in 'the kent league'
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,761

    If we lose this I really am fearing for our chances of staying up this season. It looking forward to playing another season in 'the kent league'

    Won't be the "Kent League" as we're going up. It will be called the "League for Rich Boys Who Can't Play Cricket" ;-)
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907

    If we lose this I really am fearing for our chances of staying up this season. It looking forward to playing another season in 'the kent league'

    Won't be the "Kent League" as we're going up. It will be called the "League for Rich Boys Who Can't Play Cricket" ;-)
    You are going up?! Hahaha and Karel is the greatest manager in Charlton history
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Now now gents, play nicely ;-)
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Davies c Richardson b Pringle 32. 117-4.

    Er... Fanny?
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Roy c Borthwick b Carse 34. 139-5.

    Oh bother.
  • lolwray
    lolwray Posts: 4,899
    surrey have been charltonised !
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    edited May 2016

    Roy c Borthwick b Carse 34. 139-5.

    Oh bother.

    Bother? I'm sat here at work using a number of profanities in my head.

    For fucks sake lads show some balls.

    Edit: not literally please!
  • Sponsored links:



  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Tea 154-5. Foakes 15* Curran 7*. Lead by 4.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    I am hearing that Zafar will not bat. So only 9 wickets to get. 4 more
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651

    Roy c Borthwick b Carse 34. 139-5.

    Oh bother.

    Bother? I'm sat here at work using a number of profanities in my head.

    For fucks sake lads show some balls.

    Edit: not literally please!
    Does Dave Mehmet play for you lot??

    I thought his spin class was riding a bike not bowling....
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    It's odd to me that Paul Collingwood hasn't bowled in either innings despite them using six bowlers both times. Whilst he proved he still has it with the bat I would have thought that to bat 7 you'd need to be bowling at points to justify being in the team. Specialist captain?!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,840

    It's odd to me that Paul Collingwood hasn't bowled in either innings despite them using six bowlers both times. Whilst he proved he still has it with the bat I would have thought that to bat 7 you'd need to be bowling at points to justify being in the team. Specialist captain?!

    And fielder!
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    Good news!

    50 up for Curran.

    Bad news!

    Curran c Richardson b Rushworth 54. 222-6.
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    It finishes as a draw.

    Never in doubt!
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,907
    The longer that first win evades us the harder it is going to be.

    I must admit my usual optimism has taken a bit of a dent in the last few days. Struggle to see us taking 20 wickets.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,761

    The longer that first win evades us the harder it is going to be.

    I must admit my usual optimism has taken a bit of a dent in the last few days. Struggle to see us taking 20 wickets.

    Canters - in the absence of a win, a flavour of what it is like to do so for you and your fellow Surrey fans:

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=voq02A4_7-U
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,735
    edited May 2016
    Thanks for that, AA.

    I expect canters is appreciating it too.