Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton announce £13.5m loss

123457»

Comments

  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,735
    edited April 2017
    moutuakilla said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    Interesting read. Would the signings of Ajose and Holmes count for these accounts? Although they were signed in June, the window didn't open to July 1st - so would they be in these figures or the next?
    I believe you can sign players at any time; you just can't play them until the window opens. In practice, contracts are likely to begin on July 1st.

    Ajose is named in the accounts as contributing to the total acquisition cost in 15/16; Holmes isn't.
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782
    Do the accounts show if there was any financial fine by the FA due to protests last year?
    Remember at the time that it was highly likely that fines were going to happen to due to so much encroaching on the pitch etc?
  • newyorkaddick
    newyorkaddick Posts: 3,052
    As mentioned the trade debtors were very high at year end, which I guessed related to fees agreed but not yet paid for Ajose and Holmes.
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,971
    newyorkaddick said:

    As mentioned the trade debtors were very high at year end, which I guessed related to fees agreed but not yet paid for Ajose and Holmes.

    That would be creditors, not debtors.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,735
    sammy391 said:

    Do the accounts show if there was any financial fine by the FA due to protests last year?
    Remember at the time that it was highly likely that fines were going to happen to due to so much encroaching on the pitch etc?

    There was no fine.
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,256
    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    good analysis. A good indication of how difficult a sale may be as well. In that over the last 10 years, we've kept losing money.

    It's going to take someone with some deep pockets and big ambitions to take this club on
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    cabbles said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    good analysis. A good indication of how difficult a sale may be as well. In that over the last 10 years, we've kept losing money.

    It's going to take someone with some deep pockets and big ambitions to take this club on
    Yes, but that's little different to any club outside The Prem.
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,638
    cabbles said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    good analysis. A good indication of how difficult a sale may be as well. In that over the last 10 years, we've kept losing money.

    It's going to take someone with some deep pockets and big ambitions to take this club on
    I think there was only two years when we were in the prem that we made money.
    One when we sold Parker and the other when we sold Bent.
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    £13.5m loss? Yes, thank you very much indeed Roland!
  • MountsfieldPark
    MountsfieldPark Posts: 2,074
    edited April 2017
    guinnessaddick said:

    cabbles said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    good analysis. A good indication of how difficult a sale may be as well. In that over the last 10 years, we've kept losing money.

    It's going to take someone with some deep pockets and big ambitions to take this club on
    I think there was only two years when we were in the prem that we made money.
    One when we sold Parker and the other when we sold Bent.
    But very few clubs in English pro football ever made a profit during that period; now it's no-one outside the PL that makes a profit.
  • Sponsored links:



  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,256
    Covered End said:

    cabbles said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    good analysis. A good indication of how difficult a sale may be as well. In that over the last 10 years, we've kept losing money.

    It's going to take someone with some deep pockets and big ambitions to take this club on
    Yes, but that's little different to any club outside The Prem.
    True, and that's another hurdle. Why pick us when there are so many other loss making clubs to buy.

    I think we're always considered an option given that we're London and have in recent history been in the Prem.
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,596
    edited April 2017
    MountsfieldPark said:

    guinnessaddick said:

    cabbles said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    For anyone interested, my interpretation of the accounts is written up here:

    http://newyorkaddick.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/master-of-puppets.html?m=1

    good analysis. A good indication of how difficult a sale may be as well. In that over the last 10 years, we've kept losing money.

    It's going to take someone with some deep pockets and big ambitions to take this club on
    I think there was only two years when we were in the prem that we made money.
    One when we sold Parker and the other when we sold Bent.
    But very few clubs in English pro football ever made a profit during that period; now it's no-one outside the PL that makes a profit.
    Didn't Walsall make a profit last year, and not for the first time?

    Better than I thought, 11th year in succession; http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37719889
  • newyorkaddick
    newyorkaddick Posts: 3,052
    IdleHans said:

    newyorkaddick said:

    As mentioned the trade debtors were very high at year end, which I guessed related to fees agreed but not yet paid for Ajose and Holmes.

    That would be creditors, not debtors.
    Oops good point thanks
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,596
    Baton accounts have been filed and will 'be available within 5 days'........

Categories

“Marketplace”