Surrey ccc
Comments
-
That's the end of the first innings, Middlesex finished 242/9 in their allotted 50 overs. https://t.co/UOXupdWrXd1
-
Opening with Borthwick is a strange one... don't quite understand. He's gone from 6 to opening.
Hope we send Foakes in 4. He is in great firm so let's give him as long in the middle as possible.0 -
As I type that Rocky is bowled by TRJ for 10. Sanga is in... need a big one from him!0
-
18-1 off 5 overs.
Stoneman out for 10, bowled by Roland-Jones.0 -
103-1 off 20.3 overs
Sanga 46 off 48
Borthwick 42 off 57
Keep it up!1 -
Man in form Ben Foakes keeps the runs flowing!
Burns 21* Foakes 17*
157/3(33overs) https://t.co/Mdp8oEjfz31 -
Good comfortable winning the end. And deserved after 2 unlucky losses. Even better with Dernbach unavailable. Well done Rampaul for stepping up in his absence.
Foakesy is doing very well in this format. Impressive.
Would have liked to have seen Pope get a but but glad he wasn't needed in the end.1 -
We're playing again today. Against Sussex at Hove. Sangakkara is out with a groin strain and Dernbach is still out with a back complaint. These are two big losses for a side which are already missing Roy and are still adjusting to the loss of Ansari.
We won the toss and decided to bowl. Sussex are 54-00 -
That's 5️⃣0️⃣ for Nash and 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ up for Sussex!
107/1 (20 overs)
#SUSvSUR https://t.co/7YmrpJ7ELF
Not a great start today!!!!0 -
Sussex finish on 300-8.0
- Sponsored links:
-
0
-
WICKET: S. Curran b Garton 6
139/6 (29.1 overs)
Game over really0 -
Struggling here. Missing some big players. Young Pope seems to be batting well...0
-
205 all out - Sussex win by 95 runs.0
-
It was a poor display by Surrey, to be honest. The Currans didn't bowl well and helped to give Sussex a good start. The bowling only tightened up nearly the end with Rampaul and Borthwick being the pick of the bowlers. I still thought 300 was gettable but only Stoneman and Pope showed resilience. Stoneman struggled at first, but then looked set for a ton until he played a loose shot and was caught at deep square leg. Sussex took some good catches and ran out comfortable winners. Being a Sussex supporter, I won't gloat over the win. Sussex are a fairly poor team at the moment, but just had a day when things went well for them.1
-
0
-
Don't know why link didn't post but today's match Vs Kent will be streamed on surreycricket.com
Also Roy is back1 -
Yep games being streamed... works quite well with the BBC radio commentary.
Roy in for Sibley
Sanga in for Pope
Dernbach still injured is a massive loss..
Roy and Rocky got us off to a great start. But Rocky has just gone. 34/1 off 3.5 overs.0 -
With the stream it's much better to get it through the club's YouTube channel rather than the club's site as the traffic on it keeps making the club website freeze.0
-
Shame we're not chasing, finish work at 3 and would have headed to the oval, i do like a good chase1
- Sponsored links:
-
you are Duncan Norville arent you ?Chef_addick said:Shame we're not chasing, finish work at 3 and would have headed to the oval, i do like a good chase
4 -
Surrey 141-5
expect Foakes to kick on strong soon thougj1 -
Good recovery by Foakes and the Currans.
Foakes was averaging 150 in this competition before this match.
TC caught behind as I type this.0 -
No I'm no genius but I'm studying an economics degree and I've worked as a data analyst so I feel I have a good understanding of maths and logic. I usually understand D/L in cricket but I just don't get it today.
Our score has been adjusted DOWN to 147 so Kent need 148 to win off 41.
So we batted 10 overs believing it was a 50 over game before it was adjusted down to 46 then 41. So surely that would mean our score would get adjusted up? Why down?
Beyond me?1 -
TC gets DBD bowled. I'm confident we will defend this but I'd be much more confident if we had Dernbach playing...0
-
Pretty sure it's 248 to win, not 148cantersaddick said:No I'm no genius but I'm studying an economics degree and I've worked as a data analyst so I feel I have a good understanding of maths and logic. I usually understand D/L in cricket but I just don't get it today.
Our score has been adjusted DOWN to 147 so Kent need 148 to win off 41.
So we batted 10 overs believing it was a 50 over game before it was adjusted down to 46 then 41. So surely that would mean our score would get adjusted up? Why down?
Beyond me?0 -
That's what I meant. 248. Although now the commentators are saying 249. Everyone is confused but no one dares argue.Chef_addick said:
Pretty sure it's 248 to win, not 148cantersaddick said:No I'm no genius but I'm studying an economics degree and I've worked as a data analyst so I feel I have a good understanding of maths and logic. I usually understand D/L in cricket but I just don't get it today.
Our score has been adjusted DOWN to 147 so Kent need 148 to win off 41.
So we batted 10 overs believing it was a 50 over game before it was adjusted down to 46 then 41. So surely that would mean our score would get adjusted up? Why down?
Beyond me?0 -
Club Twitter says 252!!!!!!!cantersaddick said:
That's what I meant. 248. Although now the commentators are saying 249. Everyone is confused but no one dares argue.Chef_addick said:
Pretty sure it's 248 to win, not 148cantersaddick said:No I'm no genius but I'm studying an economics degree and I've worked as a data analyst so I feel I have a good understanding of maths and logic. I usually understand D/L in cricket but I just don't get it today.
Our score has been adjusted DOWN to 147 so Kent need 148 to win off 41.
So we batted 10 overs believing it was a 50 over game before it was adjusted down to 46 then 41. So surely that would mean our score would get adjusted up? Why down?
Beyond me?0 -
All over the place... hope the players know what they are chasing!Chef_addick said:
Club Twitter says 252!!!!!!!cantersaddick said:
That's what I meant. 248. Although now the commentators are saying 249. Everyone is confused but no one dares argue.Chef_addick said:
Pretty sure it's 248 to win, not 148cantersaddick said:No I'm no genius but I'm studying an economics degree and I've worked as a data analyst so I feel I have a good understanding of maths and logic. I usually understand D/L in cricket but I just don't get it today.
Our score has been adjusted DOWN to 147 so Kent need 148 to win off 41.
So we batted 10 overs believing it was a 50 over game before it was adjusted down to 46 then 41. So surely that would mean our score would get adjusted up? Why down?
Beyond me?0 -
Meaker gets Denly for 34, Kent 55/2 Billings is next in1
