Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Surrey ccc

16566687071190

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

  • Tutt-Tutt
    Tutt-Tutt Posts: 3,272
    We effed that one up. Dropped catches lose matches. There's no way Somerset are coming back at 27-6.

    Oh well, onto the next one....
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Leuth said:

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
    Correct. One of those situations where he was in and out of the SA side and got wind of the quota system and decided cricket is too short a career . In SA, you are paid a relative pittance if you are not in the national side.
    A bit like Kyle Abbott has done with Hants this year and also , i think, Clin Ingram with Glam.
    There are some serious second tier SA players out there plying their trade.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846

    Leuth said:

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
    Correct. One of those situations where he was in and out of the SA side and got wind of the quota system and decided cricket is too short a career . In SA, you are paid a relative pittance if you are not in the national side.
    A bit like Kyle Abbott has done with Hants this year and also , i think, Clin Ingram with Glam.
    There are some serious second tier SA players out there plying their trade.
    SA cricket will have serious problems if it doesn't find a way to stop this exodus, there are more Saffers playing for counties now than in the apartheid days...

  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315

    Leuth said:

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
    Correct. One of those situations where he was in and out of the SA side and got wind of the quota system and decided cricket is too short a career . In SA, you are paid a relative pittance if you are not in the national side.
    A bit like Kyle Abbott has done with Hants this year and also , i think, Clin Ingram with Glam.
    There are some serious second tier SA players out there plying their trade.
    Except Abbott was a first choice Test bowler. But yes. Another reason why world cricket is in a mess.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280

    Leuth said:

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
    Correct. One of those situations where he was in and out of the SA side and got wind of the quota system and decided cricket is too short a career . In SA, you are paid a relative pittance if you are not in the national side.
    A bit like Kyle Abbott has done with Hants this year and also , i think, Clin Ingram with Glam.
    There are some serious second tier SA players out there plying their trade.
    SA cricket will have serious problems if it doesn't find a way to stop this exodus, there are more Saffers playing for counties now than in the apartheid days...

    Its the changing face of SA cricket and society, you have only to look at the quality of the non-white players coming through to realise they also now have more kids coming through than they used to . For example, in my sons school in Cape Town, in a year of some 60 boys, they still run 3 cricket teams - now thats amazing, coz it basically means that over half the year are playing cricket - try comparing that with England.
    Out of the back of that, consequently you are having kids playing cricket now who were maybe denied before - thus the likes of Rabada and Bavuma are now emerging.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846

    Leuth said:

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
    Correct. One of those situations where he was in and out of the SA side and got wind of the quota system and decided cricket is too short a career . In SA, you are paid a relative pittance if you are not in the national side.
    A bit like Kyle Abbott has done with Hants this year and also , i think, Clin Ingram with Glam.
    There are some serious second tier SA players out there plying their trade.
    SA cricket will have serious problems if it doesn't find a way to stop this exodus, there are more Saffers playing for counties now than in the apartheid days...

    Its the changing face of SA cricket and society, you have only to look at the quality of the non-white players coming through to realise they also now have more kids coming through than they used to . For example, in my sons school in Cape Town, in a year of some 60 boys, they still run 3 cricket teams - now thats amazing, coz it basically means that over half the year are playing cricket - try comparing that with England.
    Out of the back of that, consequently you are having kids playing cricket now who were maybe denied before - thus the likes of Rabada and Bavuma are now emerging.
    There might be great non-white players coming through, but clearly no money in the domestic game.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Not a great deal, unless you are in the elite.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Leuth said:

    Leuth said:

    What a turnaround!

    What's he doing playing for the Netherlands? S Africa do seem to be losing an awful lot of players to other countries or Kolpak deals.

    He played a bit for SA years ago but they dropped him so he decided to eff off I think
    Correct. One of those situations where he was in and out of the SA side and got wind of the quota system and decided cricket is too short a career . In SA, you are paid a relative pittance if you are not in the national side.
    A bit like Kyle Abbott has done with Hants this year and also , i think, Clin Ingram with Glam.
    There are some serious second tier SA players out there plying their trade.
    Except Abbott was a first choice Test bowler. But yes. Another reason why world cricket is in a mess.
    Well, i sorta know what you're getting at, but i would dispute that Abbott was first choice - especially when youve got the likes of Rabada,Steyn,Morkel,Philander,Morris,Parnell,Phelukwayo around, OK, he might have have been playing at the time coz of injuries but he knew his time was limited, what with the new quota system being announced too.
  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    I've got a little fee time so I'm gonna try and get a few excuses out there for both Surrey and my dreadful performances.

    It sounded like that was a pitch where it was very difficult to play on initially but once you got in it was much easier to play.

    That is the sort of innings that happens vary rarely when everything the batsman tries comes off. There's not a huge amount you can do about it and other than the Sanga drop he didn't give a chance. He 'rode the wave' incredibly well and made the most of it. You can't legislate for something special like that. I will say we should have brought Jade and Sam back a lot earlier. There is no point to saving them for the death if they've pretty much won by that point. We needed a wicket. They were the ones who could do it.

    Having said that criminal to let them get away from where we had them. Perhaps were lacking that killer instinct to kill them hem hem while they're down.



    I think our batting looks pretty weak in this format. Roy can't come back soon enough.

    Whilst they all got starts today I think we have too many slow nudges the 1s and 2s type batsmen and no one who can take the game away.

    Foakes got a good score and a very good strike rate but he will never dominate the bowlers like Roy can...
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    Last line makes it sound like you want to drop the bloke who scored 92 off 65 and is also the best wicketkeeper in the country ;)
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    edited April 2017
    Leuth said:

    Last line makes it sound like you want to drop the bloke who scored 92 off 65 and is also the best wicketkeeper in the country ;)

    Not at all. I am a huge fan of Foakes. I'm am simply saying we have too many batsmen of that ilk. He is one I would keep in the lineup as is Sanga (obviously) and Borthwick. But that only leaves room, in an ideal world, for one of Sibley/Stoneman/Burns. Yesterday we played all 3 because we had no one else. Think it highlights how this is our weakest format this year....
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Cmon Canters we all know its your fault.
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,557
    So we won today :smile:

    Glamorgan 239, Surrey 183-2, winning by 8 wickets by Duckworth-Lewis. Sangakkara made 81*, passing 19000 runs in List A cricket, and Stoneman made 74, bringing up his 50 off just 36 balls. Dernbach and Sam Curran both bowled well, taking 3-30 and 3-51 respectively.

    Sorry for not doing updates, but I find it harder to muster as much enthusiasm for one-day cricket as I do for tests and the County Championship! I'm an old codger at heart...
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915

    So we won today :smile:

    Glamorgan 239, Surrey 183-2, winning by 8 wickets by Duckworth-Lewis. Sangakkara made 81*, passing 19000 runs in List A cricket, and Stoneman made 74, bringing up his 50 off just 36 balls. Dernbach and Sam Curran both bowled well, taking 3-30 and 3-51 respectively.

    Sorry for not doing updates, but I find it harder to muster as much enthusiasm for one-day cricket as I do for tests and the County Championship! I'm an old codger at heart...

    No worried Epsom. We've all been otherwise engaged a bit today.

    I think I should be banned from doing updates because of my performance on Friday! :p

    Good to bounce straight back from Fridays result!
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    Worcs looking fearsome. Be glad we're in the North Group
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    Surrey struggling in the RLODC. We won the toss and batted. Pitch hasn't been as good as expected commentators think it's getting worse.... so there is hope for us.

    119-4 Foakes and Borthwick going slow but rebuilding
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    As I speak 2 wickets fall in 2 balls.

    Borthwick b bopara 37
    Sam c at slip (incredible catch) b bopara.

    Ravi on a hattrick!
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    TC and Foakes need to last out the last 15 overs.
  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    TC going well on 27 from 19 balls.

    Foakes on 56 against his former side.

    From what I'm hearing anything above 200 gives us a chance. I'd be aiming at 220+ from here.

    164-6
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    TC went for 33 off 27.

    Batty went for it but was out for 7 off 6.

    He's gone early. Boundaries are all the way out here. Commentators are saying this is odd. They aren't usually this far out even for test matches... Batty would usually have had 6 for that shot but was caught on the boundary.

    Harder to score...
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    All out for 210 Foakes 77 not out.

    About 20 or so under par but given the pitch and conditions I think we are in with a good shout.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    Jade hit a 6 over the long boundary but holed out next ball.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    I'm not saying anything.
  • Chef_addick
    Chef_addick Posts: 2,196
    Essex currently 13/3
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    Great start.
  • Chef_addick
    Chef_addick Posts: 2,196
    115/6 , not sure how many overs left as they don't say on Twitter
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    After the Somerset game I'm saying nothing
  • Chef_addick
    Chef_addick Posts: 2,196
    edited May 2017
    129/7, 11 overs left