England Cricket 2017
Comments
-
Hence it's only a start to get tests back on free to air tv. I can't believe it's been 12 years since the last live test on tv! Where did that time go???MrOneLung said:No live test cricket though
0 -
That deal is ridiculous. £1.1 billion and all they get is a few T20 internationals!Bournemouth Addick said:Well, it's a start I suppose...
m.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/404555561 -
I know! You could buy yourself back into government with that much money.Chrissy\\\'s Army!! said:
That deal is ridiculous. £1.1 billion and all they get is a few T20 internationals!Bournemouth Addick said:Well, it's a start I suppose...
m.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/40455556
*joking*2 -
That is the total BBC and sky fee. Majority of which sky will be paying.Chrissy\\\'s Army!! said:
That deal is ridiculous. £1.1 billion and all they get is a few T20 internationals!Bournemouth Addick said:Well, it's a start I suppose...
m.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/404555560 -
Yes, the BBC share of that will be tinyMrOneLung said:
That is the total BBC and sky fee. Majority of which sky will be paying.Chrissy\\\'s Army!! said:
That deal is ridiculous. £1.1 billion and all they get is a few T20 internationals!Bournemouth Addick said:Well, it's a start I suppose...
m.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/404555560 -
Are we really likely to play 2 spinners? Dawson is hardly going to run through the S Africans, though if he went in at 8 would strengthen the batting in the absence of Woakes. And if we play TRJ, we'll have 5 right arm seamers which again looks OTT.Callumcafc said:Gary Ballance set to be included in the squad and expected to bat at 3 in the first test. Haseeb Hameed likely to be left out. Liam Dawson also recalled into the squad.
From the sounds of the article below the team will be:
Cook, Jennings, Ballance, Root, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Wood, Broad, Anderson, Roland-Jones/Dawson
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jun/30/gary-ballance-test-recall-england-south-africa
As we already have 4 seamers and Mooen, I'd have been tempted to play an extra batsman, especially with Jennings being new and Balance having question marks against him.1 -
Its odd that without Woakes, the tail starts to look quite long.2
-
As you say, KAF, in the bowling dept we are looking quite sameish - if only we could find a real quality leftie - hurry up Sam Curran !1
-
Cook, Jennings, Ballance, Root, Bairstow, Ali, Dawson, Wood, Broad, Anderson0
-
Are we only playing 10 to give SA a chance?Callumcafc said:Cook, Jennings, Ballance, Root, Bairstow, Ali, Dawson, Wood, Broad, Anderson
4 - Sponsored links:
-
Sorry, missed Stokes!Addick Addict said:
Are we only playing 10 to give SA a chance?Callumcafc said:Cook, Jennings, Ballance, Root, Bairstow, Ali, Dawson, Wood, Broad, Anderson
1 -
Can't wait for a bit of test cricket, feels like it's been away for too long. I love Eng v SA series, they almost always seem to be close and hard-fought.
Great article about the 1998 series here which really whetted my appetite.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jul/04/england-south-africa-1998-the-spin
0 -
No ABV and no du Plessis for this match either so their batting looks a bit thin0
-
Not sure we need 4 and a half quicks (Jennings has been 5th bowler for Durham this year) and 2 spinners. Think it's a bit overkill.
I guess the argument is that there is no need for a specialist batsman at 7 as Moeen and Dawson are more than good enough. Fair point but there is no need for too many bowlers. My choice would be Foakes at 7 to take pressure off Bairstow and allow him to focus on batting 5. Foakes is a specialist keeper who will save more runs than he will cost and more than capable of batting 7. That strengthens the batting but does little damage to the bowling...
Personally if we were having 2 spinners I'd make one of them Rashid. If he's second spinner there is no need for him to be able to the up and end you might as well use him as an attacking bowler.0 -
Eng won toss & chose to bat.
14-1 Cook caught behind wafting unnecessarily.0 -
Don't worry though, Gary Ballance is in now!4
-
17-2
Jennings lbw Philander 8
I would have reviewed it, looked dubious. We shall see, not that it matters.0 -
Getting worried about how much cricket I'll get to see on Sunday...0
-
We're going Saturday.killerandflash said:Getting worried about how much cricket I'll get to see on Sunday...
It pitched outside leg, so would have been not out, as I suspected. It was also missing the stumps !0 -
That's poor0
- Sponsored links:
-
Why wasn't Stoneman picked?1
-
Because the selectors knew Gaz Baz would take them apart1
-
He's still in (q kiss of death), and has scored tons of runs this season (averaging 94 over 13 innings) - that's why he's playing !Leuth said:Because the selectors knew Gaz Baz would take them apart
This might come back to bite you !0 -
Exactly - he's taking them apart. 160* by close of play1
-
Would think def next cab off the rank.dickplumb said:Why wasn't Stoneman picked?
0 -
Ballance will score a double hundred, look solid for the rest of the series and be our top run scorer in the Ashes in a few months. ;-)1
-
The Snail That Ran1
-
Ballance lbw Morkel2
-
Ballance looking good but still gets stuck in his crease so, if he ever misses it, he's out.0
-
One to you LeuthLeuth said:The Snail That Ran
0