Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Surrey ccc

1116117119121122190

Comments

  • And he gets another almost immediately!

    Hildreth lbw b Clarke 1

    105-3
  • Make that three!

    Abell b Clarke 0

    105-4
  • Byrom c Meaker b Clarke 42

    122-5
  • An incredible spell gets even better!

    Trego b Clarke 2

    138-6
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    edited September 2017
    Craig Overton and Steve Davies put on 53 together, before:

    Overton b S Curran 24

    191-7
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    edited September 2017
    206-7 at tea, Davies still there on 51*.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,668
    Now let's finish the job for once .
    Fed up with letting situations like this slip away.
  • Saw we were 3rd in the table having only won 1 game all season!!
  • Now let's finish the job for once .
    Fed up with letting situations like this slip away.

    I fear it's happening again... this partnership is now worth 60.
  • Bess c&b Clarke 27

    252-8
  • Sponsored links:



  • Leach lbw b Batty 2

    260-9
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,668
    Come on the Rey.
    One more wicket
  • Davies c Stoneman b Clarke 86

    269 all out. Not bad given what happened in the morning session, but can't help feel we've let them off a hook a little after Clarke's phenomenal spell.
  • 42-0 at the close, Burns 16* and Stoneman 21*.

    Burns has now passed 1,000 first class runs for the season.
  • 50 for Stoneman

    93-0
  • Just as I post that...

    Stoneman c Davies b Trego 51

    97-1
  • Burns b Trego 43

    114-2
  • Patel c Davies b Groenewald 14

    118-3... this is turning into a mirror image of the first innings.
  • 122-3 at lunch.
  • Foakes c Davies b Trego 26

    169-4
  • Sponsored links:



  • Off for bad light.

    187-4
  • They've taken tea - resumption planned for 3pm.
  • They're back out again... it'll be a long evening session.
  • You know the drill...

    50 for Sangakkara.
  • I know its something that you probably have answered many times , but I notice on the BBC today that Surrey are one of five that could be relegated.
    How possible is that?
  • Off again for bad light.

    We (136) were 13 points ahead of Middlesex and Somerset (both 123) before the start of this game, and they're second and third-bottom respectively (Warwickshire are already down), while Yorkshire are only one point better off... with Hampshire in the mix as well I'd say it's pretty unlikely that we'll go down. But you can't quite rule it out just yet.
  • Off again for bad light.

    We (136) were 13 points ahead of Middlesex and Somerset (both 123) before the start of this game, and they're second and third-bottom respectively (Warwickshire are already down), while Yorkshire are only one point better off... with Hampshire in the mix as well I'd say it's pretty unlikely that we'll go down. But you can't quite rule it out just yet.

    Cheers Epsom, so, it looks like as long as we don't lose to Summerzet then we should be fine.?
  • I should think so.
  • It's brightening up, and the teams are back out again.
  • We've passed Somerset's total.