Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

13723733753773782262

Comments

  • Davo55
    Davo55 Posts: 7,836
    SDAddick said:

    I have to say I still don’t get it.

    Three groups still negotiating. No formal bids and yet the information we are getting is that it will be done within four weeks.

    Sorry I've probably missed this, but where are we getting the "no formal bids" from?

    Also, do we know how we're defining "formal bid?" Because some numbers must have been mentioned to get to the due diligence phase.

    To take an example from really early in in my career, a company I was part of was looking to buy a company we had a relationship with, and it was widely agreed that the figure would be somewhere between $12-15m. So as we got close-ish to closing the deal, their senior people said "oh that $15m figure doesn't include our buyout clauses and stock potentials" or something along those lines. So in the end we made one final "take it or leave it offer," which was the only (or second, can't remember) "formal offer" we made.

    Sorry, this is all a long way of saying a "formal offer" may just be the last offer or an offer made very near to the end. As in you agree a ballpark/range, undergo dd and all that, haggle back and forth, and then submit your formal offer.
    Exactly. A firm bid can often be the final stage once negotiations have established the proposed terms, conditions and financial parameters of the deal. Then it moves very fast.
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,477
    Well it is February now. Not going to hold my breath though.
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,127

    I have to say I still don’t get it.

    Three groups still negotiating. No formal bids and yet the information we are getting is that it will be done within four weeks.

    Because the first part isn’t correct.
    So @ShootersHillGuru does get it?
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    HarryLime said:

    Unconfirmed sources report the third bidder is also called Muir.

    More unconfirmed sources, I am led to believe the the seller is Duchatelet.
    image
  • Taxi_Lad
    Taxi_Lad Posts: 3,770
    It's February!!! This could be the month. In 4 weeks time we might be rid of Roland Duchatelet forever!!!
    Just let that sink in for a little while
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948

    On the train and just heard an Aussie bloke wearing a kilt and drinking a can of red bull, talking on his phone about "needing another gross weight of duck tape to get the deal over the line".

    Proper confused now. Probably nothing.

    Sounds like a manual grafter
  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,894
    edited February 2018

    On the train and just heard an Aussie bloke wearing a kilt and drinking a can of red bull, talking on his phone about "needing another gross weight of duck tape to get the deal over the line".

    Proper confused now. Probably nothing.

    Stopped reading at 'On the train' which is obviously a lie.
  • Dave2l
    Dave2l Posts: 8,868
    Does this also mean that the 55million thing was a load of bollocks and time was wasted moaning about it.
  • Maybe the 3 bidders will join forces and form a massive consortium.

    Then we will be bigger than The Massives.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Redskin
    Redskin Posts: 3,115
    Dave2l said:

    Does this also mean that the 55million thing was a load of bollocks and time was wasted moaning about it.

    Moaning is the lifeblood of the thread.
  • On the train and just heard an Aussie bloke wearing a kilt and drinking a can of red bull, talking on his phone about "needing another gross weight of duck tape to get the deal over the line".

    Proper confused now. Probably nothing.

    Sounds like a manual grafter
    Unlikely mate this was in first class.
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,210

    Maybe the 3 bidders will join forces and form a massive consortium.

    Then we will be bigger than The Massives.

    No one can be bigger than The Massives!
  • So, Lookman is brokering the Red Bull takeover deal?
  • Uboat said:

    This thread is going to descend into a mass brawl, complete with custard pies, flying furniture and hair pulling, at which point a little known member of the forum will turn up and quietly announce that our take over by Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates has just gone through.

    Nah, the takeover will be by Jeff Stelling, Sue "eating the buffet" Parkes and Gareth Gates
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,196

    Uboat said:

    This thread is going to descend into a mass brawl, complete with custard pies, flying furniture and hair pulling, at which point a little known member of the forum will turn up and quietly announce that our take over by Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates has just gone through.

    Nah, the takeover will be by Jeff Stelling, Sue "eating the buffet" Parkes and Gareth Gates
    I'd take that.
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,885
    edited February 2018
    Uboat said:

    Uboat said:

    This thread is going to descend into a mass brawl, complete with custard pies, flying furniture and hair pulling, at which point a little known member of the forum will turn up and quietly announce that our take over by Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates has just gone through.

    Nah, the takeover will be by Jeff Stelling, Sue "eating the buffet" Parkes and Gareth Gates
    I'd take that.
    Relight my fire? :wink:
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448

    So, Lookman is brokering the Red Bull takeover deal?

    On horseback.
  • mogodon
    mogodon Posts: 3,406
    Taxi_Lad said:

    It's February!!! This could be the month. In 4 weeks time we might be rid of Roland Duchatelet forever!!!
    Just let that sink in for a little while

    February ... but in which year?
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,984
    seth plum said:

    So, Lookman is brokering the Red Bull takeover deal?

    On horseback.
    With his hampton out?
  • Sponsored links:



  • SexyDave
    SexyDave Posts: 374

    I have to say I still don’t get it.

    Three groups still negotiating. No formal bids and yet the information we are getting is that it will be done within four weeks.

    Because the first part isn’t correct.
    Soooo he gets it?
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Konsa staying is hopefully an indication that a deal is close
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448

    seth plum said:

    So, Lookman is brokering the Red Bull takeover deal?

    On horseback.
    With his hampton out?
    No, that only applies to Tottenham.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,230
    Swisdom said:

    Konsa staying is hopefully an indication that a deal is close

    Or, playing devil's advocate that it isn't close.

    Maybe Duchatelet thinks he'll get more for him in the summer or thinks that keeping him gives us more chance of promotion so he can sell the club for more in the summer.

    I suspect it is now no longer relevant either way.
  • SexyDave
    SexyDave Posts: 374
    I should finish reading the thread before commenting, @Fumbluff beat me to it...
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,320
    @SDAddick is one day younger than me, it seems. I will henceforth refer to him as Junior
  • Swisdom said:

    Konsa staying is hopefully an indication that a deal is close

    Swisdom said:

    Konsa staying is hopefully an indication that a deal is close

    Or, playing devil's advocate that it isn't close.

    Maybe Duchatelet thinks he'll get more for him in the summer or thinks that keeping him gives us more chance of promotion so he can sell the club for more in the summer.

    I suspect it is now no longer relevant either way.
    image
  • Konsa sold - RD wanted to cash in before he sold the club.

    Konsa stays - A sale must be imminent and RD didn't want the club to lose value.

    Confirmation bias at work right there.
  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,198

    As the Chinese say when discussing the internal machinations of the ruling Communist Party, "Those who talk really don't know and those who really know don't talk."

    Now I'm confused. By that definition, the people that said that talked so they don't really know that. Unless those that do know do talk but are saying they don't.
This discussion has been closed.