TWITTER! No comments. Just post your favourite tweets.
Comments
-
-
-
.0
-
He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?0
-
Sponsored links:
-
-
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
0 -
If you look at the picture he is behind a white line tho, which could be the touchlineCovered End said:
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
1 -
You need to get your eyes checked. Watch the video again. He clearly took it from the line, which just happened to be close to the shadow.Covered End said:
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
The other 'line' that you think is 2-3 metres away is actually the edge of a white hoarding.
You seriously think a player could take a throw in 2-3 metres inside the touchline and no one in the stadium would notice?0 -
-
Think you need to get your eyes checked. At the end of the shadow or your line there is no corner flag or quadrant. He took it from a shadow.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
You need to get your eyes checked. Watch the video again. He clearly took it from the line, which just happened to be close to the shadow.Covered End said:
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
The other 'line' that you think is 2-3 metres away is actually the edge of a white hoarding.
You seriously think a player could take a throw in 2-3 metres inside the touchline and no one in the stadium would notice?2 -
You can't see the quadrant because the camera didn't pan that far.MrOneLung said:
Think you need to get your eyes checked. At the end of the shadow or your line there is no corner flag or quadrant. He took it from a shadow.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
You need to get your eyes checked. Watch the video again. He clearly took it from the line, which just happened to be close to the shadow.Covered End said:
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
The other 'line' that you think is 2-3 metres away is actually the edge of a white hoarding.
You seriously think a player could take a throw in 2-3 metres inside the touchline and no one in the stadium would notice?
The touch line is just within the shadow, the bright white line is the top of the hoardings.
Anyone who thinks different is blind, stupid or both3 -
1 -
Yeah I did. I'm off to Specsavers tomorrow.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
You need to get your eyes checked. Watch the video again. He clearly took it from the line, which just happened to be close to the shadow.Covered End said:
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
The other 'line' that you think is 2-3 metres away is actually the edge of a white hoarding.
You seriously think a player could take a throw in 2-3 metres inside the touchline and no one in the stadium would notice?1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Good then I hope you can all read no commentsCovered End said:
Yeah I did. I'm off to Specsavers tomorrow.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
You need to get your eyes checked. Watch the video again. He clearly took it from the line, which just happened to be close to the shadow.Covered End said:
He was 2-3 metres inside the line. He took it from the shadow of the stand.1StevieG said:He took the throw in from the line? What’s so funny about that?
The other 'line' that you think is 2-3 metres away is actually the edge of a white hoarding.
You seriously think a player could take a throw in 2-3 metres inside the touchline and no one in the stadium would notice?0 -
-
24 -
If both teams are getting 9,000 that leaves 70% of the stadium for the rest including sponsors and corporates etc.ForeverAddickted said:
Disgusting.0 -
the other final is almost as badCallumcafc said:
If both teams are getting 9,000 that leaves 70% of the stadium for the rest including sponsors and corporates etc.ForeverAddickted said:
Disgusting.
70,000 seater stadium for a Champions League Final both teams get 16,626.
33,252 out of 70,000
Leaving
36,748 for others
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-champions-league-final-ticket-14608311.amp0 -
The cheeky scousers will find a way in though.0
-
Wont it be the same for the Play-Off Final...Callumcafc said:
If both teams are getting 9,000 that leaves 70% of the stadium for the rest including sponsors and corporates etc.ForeverAddickted said:
Disgusting.
I didnt think it was a 50/50 split between the two teams and that a good number will be distributed to neutral fans0
This discussion has been closed.