Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
League 1 scores
Comments
-
Just for reference Marshall, Pratley and Lapslie all started that dayForeverAddickted said:
Like how those who say they took 4-pts from us fail to realise we didnt have a full strength team when we've faced them - Certainly not in the first gameflyingkiwiDK said:
I particularly enjoyed reading this onekillerandflash said:
https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/can-anyone-actually-see-us-beating-charlton.1471744/
Bielik, Cullen, Williams and Sarr all not involved.
If Sunderland fans knew that the 4 point line would be out the window.1 -
Am I the only one who wants us to finish 5th and get Sunderland at home first leg. The way we're playing at the moment, I can see us winning both legs. Peterborough are the dark horses and spoil the party if any of us underestimate them0
-
_MrDick said:Am I the only one who wants us to finish 5th and get Sunderland at home first leg. The way we're playing at the moment, I can see us winning both legs. Peterborough are the dark horses and spoil the party if any of us underestimate them
Peterborough are not even guaranteed a playoff spot yet plus I think Donny will win their last game.0 -
(Edited first couple of paragraphs to clarify that this is the National League's current system)stoneroses19 said:
Isn’t this system already in place in England though? I thought this was what happens in the National League South and North or something very similar anyway.Briston_Addick said:
I realise I'm influenced here by my love of Aussie Rules but the various play-off systems used in the leagues gives greater rewards if you finish higher in the table, the main thing being one-off matches with the higher-ranked team having home advantage and a second chance if you lose the first match.clb74 said:
I might be the only one , but I don't agree with the play offsse9addick said:
Imagine if Doncaster or Peterborough won the playoffs!Callumcafc said:
For example, in a four-team system team 1 hosts team 2 with the winner going through to the final. Team 3 plays team 4 with the loser going home and the winner travelling to the loser of the first match.
It means that if you enter the play-offs in the final spot you have to beat all the other sides away from home in order to get promoted.
There's something similar in the National League (and North and South divisions): the quarter-final stage sees 3 play 6 and 4 host 5, with the top two teams given a bye until the semi-final stage where they are at home to the winners of the quarters BUT there's no "double chance", a key feature in the Aussie systems.
The AFL has increased the number of teams involved in the play-offs (or 'Finals' as they call them) over the years, from four and then five teams in the old VFL days, up to six and now eight as the league has expanded from the original 12 in the VFL to the 18 now in the national comp.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_System
1 -
Blimey that’s changed a lot since the days I used to watch the Hawks at MCG.Briston_Addick said:
There's something similar in the National League (and North and South divisions) but there's no "double chance", a key feature in the Aussie systems.stoneroses19 said:
Isn’t this system already in place in England though? I thought this was what happens in the National League South and North or something very similar anyway.Briston_Addick said:
I realise I'm influenced here by my love of Aussie Rules but the various play-off systems used in the leagues gives greater rewards if you finish higher in the table, the main thing being one-off matches with the higher-ranked team having home advantage and a second chance if you lose the first match.clb74 said:
I might be the only one , but I don't agree with the play offsse9addick said:
Imagine if Doncaster or Peterborough won the playoffs!Callumcafc said:
For example, in a four-team system team 1 hosts team 2 with the winner going through to the final. Team 3 plays team 4 with the loser going home and the winner travelling to the loser of the first match.
It means that if you enter the play-offs in the final spot you have to beat all the other sides away from home in order to get promoted.
The quarter-final stage sees 3 play 6 and 4 host 5, with the top two teams given a bye until the semi-final stage where they are at home to the winners of the quarters.
The AFL has increased the number of teams involved in the play-offs (or 'Finals' as they call them) over the years, from four and then five teams in the old VFL days, up to six and now eight as the league has expanded from the original 12 in the VFL to the 18 now in the national comp.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_System0 -
Yeah we all hated getting promoted that way in 98.EveshamAddick said:
I agree. Bring back top 3 promoted. It should all be based on a whole season’s results. It’s a nonsense that the team finishing 6th could go up.clb74 said:
I might be the only one , but I don't agree with the play offsse9addick said:
Imagine if Doncaster or Peterborough won the playoffs!Callumcafc said:7 -
Everybody knows what they have to do before the season starts so you can't complain about finishing third and not going up. The solution is to come first or second. The play offs make the leagues more interesting.13
-
So would I....Rossman92 said:
If Doncaster draw vs Coventry and Peterborough beat Burton, the Posh grab 6th. Nothing even close to cut and dry yet. Would love a chance to somehow get one over on PeterboroughAthletico Charlton said:Blimey. Hopefully knocks confidence out of both, they rest players and lose again Saturday so we can get Donny in the play off semi’s2 -
Peterborough are in great form. Best avoided.2
-
Congratulations to Luton and Barnsley. Over the season, deserved promotions.4
- Sponsored links:
-
Mmmm I beg to differ .MuttleyCAFC said:Peterborough are in great form. Best avoided.
Last 10 games form table isn’t great and last 5
isn’t exactly pulling up trees .
8 -
Rochdale are no pushover, looking at that!3
-
Peterborough only recently lost to Walsall... WALSALL!!!
They're far too Jekyll and Hyde for me - Not convinced they can get the result they need against Burton1 -
That goals conceded column for us though compared to everyone else is frightening
Charlton (5) | Portsmouth (13) | Sunderland (12) | Doncaster (13)5 -
....and look at Peterborough. Conceded more than they scored.ForeverAddickted said:That goals conceded column for us though compared to everyone else is frightening
Charlton (5) | Portsmouth (13) | Sunderland (12) | Doncaster (13)0 -
the only sad thing is a couple of results and we would be right in the mix/up. the penalty miss against pboro and loss to oxford spring to mind1
-
Not to mention the goals conceded over the course of the entire season rather than just formRedrobo said:
....and look at Peterborough. Conceded more than they scored.ForeverAddickted said:That goals conceded column for us though compared to everyone else is frightening
Charlton (5) | Portsmouth (13) | Sunderland (12) | Doncaster (13)
Charlton (40) | Portsmouth (50) | Sunderland (45) | Doncaster (58) | Peterborough (61); Only Barnsley have a better defence than us in the whole Division - We keep it tight during the Play-Offs and make no stupid mistakes then we surely stand the best chance
2 -
Maybe, but its important not to look at with bias. Doncaster goal ruled out in the last minute, a ridicolous amount of penalties given this season some of which are very suspect (luton, Oxford H) come to mind.palarsehater said:the only sad thing is a couple of results and we would be right in the mix/up. the penalty miss against pboro and loss to oxford spring to mind2 -
Pointless to think like that really, other teams can say the same thing.palarsehater said:the only sad thing is a couple of results and we would be right in the mix/up. the penalty miss against pboro and loss to oxford spring to mind8 -
true but i don't care about other teams.5
- Sponsored links:
-
your username suggests otherwise...38
-
anyway not worried about anyone we are the best team in the playoffs so hopefully get the job done, we are 3rd faves in the betting market
pompey 7/4
sunderland 7/4
charlton 4/1
doncaster 8/1
peterborough 20/11 -
Strange odds. If I had any money I'd get involved.2
-
Peterborough seem to start every season scoring plenty of goal, winning games, then they have a slump and then finish well just missing the playoffs.2
-
Stunningly goodForeverAddickted said:That goals conceded column for us though compared to everyone else is frightening
Charlton (5) | Portsmouth (13) | Sunderland (12) | Doncaster (13)3 -
Oh dear .... you mean we're no longer underdogs? I'm not sure I'm very comfortable with that. And first off, Rochdale might not be such a push-over. Maybe they've got used to winning and they find they like it and want to do it some more. I think this is going to be a very big game, a play-off prequel.
What a fabulous job our coaching staff have done to get us this far, how brilliantly the team have overcome so many difficulties, and what a thankless task it must feel like to be involved with an absentee Owner such as ours. It seems we must always do things the hard way. So really that makes us underdogs after all, right?
3 -
Such a big game that I might even check the score during my first league cricket match of the season0
-
Depends where we finish; if we take third then no we cant be considered UnderdogsGlassHalfFull said:
Oh dear .... you mean we're no longer underdogs? I'm not sure I'm very comfortable with that. And first off, Rochdale might not be such a push-over. Maybe they've got used to winning and they find they like it and want to do it some more. I think this is going to be a very big game, a play-off prequel.
What a fabulous job our coaching staff have done to get us this far, how brilliantly the team have overcome so many difficulties, and what a thankless task it must feel like to be involved with an absentee Owner such as ours. It seems we must always do things the hard way. So really that makes us underdogs after all, right?
If we stay fifth then yes we are still as based on League position you've got to favour the two teams that finish above us0 -
If I'm correct, in January we were some way of the top 2. We needed to keep winning to solidate our play off place as I remember being tight. Then I belive a win against pompy in march made pretty sure of play offs.JoshAddick said:
How would our season have been dead in Jan when we were in the race for 2nd about 3 weeks ago?AdTheAddicK said:Play offs are class. Without them our season would of been dead by Jan like most. Would you really be bothered and interested mid table in jan? I wouldn't. The play offs are a great idea.
What I'm trying to say is without play offs there would be no interest by Jan. Teams would be on holiday mode for pretty much half the season.
Also can you beat a play off? Just a pure emotion roller-coaster, one I cant wait to ride. Just hope we turn up this year at minimum.
1 -
No, I'm sorry Mr Addickted (or may I call you Forever) - I can't accept that fifth means automatic underdoggishness. If 3rd to 5th all win we stay 5th, but on current form we are actually well ahead. Ignoring the early-season table distortions our lowest point has been 13th on 27 Oct, by coincidence the last time we played Rochdale. Since then we've been pretty steadily on the march, and it's only the consistency of our rivals that have held us back in 5th.
Although I am the eternal optimist I'm not happy being top dog - something's not normal!!
3
