Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

++ Tomer Hemed (p47 gone to New Zealand) ++

1235749

Comments

  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,167
    Thanks....Sorry - misread it....wishful thinking...
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    We all love our own brew... 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,670
    If the Hemed deal falls through we should use what wages he was going to get and put it towards a new improved deal for Lyle. 
    Keeping Lyle happy and focused this season is vital imo.
  • I can't understand why this is taking so long. My gut feeling is that the FA are going to reject it, and the delay is in writing the reasons why. We have previous with the FA, it was a frivolous transfer!
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,477
    cafc-west said:
    Thanks....Sorry - misread it....wishful thinking...
    Ok......as you were then mate......do that kind of thing myself now and again.
  • What time do the FA knock off on a Friday afternoon ? No outcome until next week now do you think ? 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Got an inkling given how decent a signing he is, and given Brighton may have released him to allow us to sign him, that he'll be unveiled tomorrow and that he is eligible to play...
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    I can't see it not being announced tonight. No insider info, just think we are going to hear one way or the other by 6. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,844
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49294621

    The Monteiro deal was approved an hour ago, so the FA are still processing deals
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,993
    Oggy Red said:
    Perhaps Hemed thought it was to be a loan deal with Brighton paying a percentage of his wages ?
    Perhaps whether a loan or a permanent, Hemed and CAFC didn't agree on the wages ?
    I would think this is a distinct possibility.
    It's more often than not about money.
    Despite the FA still scrutinising the deal, it's been said both Brighton and Charlton completed the paperwork, therefore they must have been signed by the player beforehand.

    The financial side must have already been agreed.


    Perhaps the FA agreed the deal, but Charlton said that because they didn't want to say that the player was stalling over wages? I don't know if the wages agreed with a player have to be in the paperwork ? 
  • Sponsored links:



  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    edited August 2019
    Oggy Red said:
    Perhaps Hemed thought it was to be a loan deal with Brighton paying a percentage of his wages ?
    Perhaps whether a loan or a permanent, Hemed and CAFC didn't agree on the wages ?
    I would think this is a distinct possibility.
    It's more often than not about money.
    Despite the FA still scrutinising the deal, it's been said both Brighton and Charlton completed the paperwork, therefore they must have been signed by the player beforehand.

    The financial side must have already been agreed.


    Perhaps the FA agreed the deal, but Charlton said that because they didn't want to say that the player was stalling over wages? I don't know if the wages agreed with a player have to be in the paperwork ? 
    I would imagine some sort of proof that the player has agreed to the terms/contract would have to be sent off alongside the paperwork.
  • Oggy Red said:
    Perhaps Hemed thought it was to be a loan deal with Brighton paying a percentage of his wages ?
    Perhaps whether a loan or a permanent, Hemed and CAFC didn't agree on the wages ?
    I would think this is a distinct possibility.
    It's more often than not about money.
    Despite the FA still scrutinising the deal, it's been said both Brighton and Charlton completed the paperwork, therefore they must have been signed by the player beforehand.

    The financial side must have already been agreed.


    Perhaps the FA agreed the deal, but Charlton said that because they didn't want to say that the player was stalling over wages? I don't know if the wages agreed with a player have to be in the paperwork ? 
    If the player hadn’t agreed terms then no deal was struck and why bother submitting paperwork. I’m certain it’s not that.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Totally still at SL. 








    (Mobile Photoshop is difficult)

  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,285
    I believe the deal sheet that had to be submitted by 7pm last night had to be signed by both clubs and the player concerned. If he hadn't agreed it wouldn't even have been submitted. There must be some other issue. I would have guessed work permit but if he Polish passport as somebody suggested that can't be it
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    All done... (Slightly better)

  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,955
    No, Dazzler .... don't wind us up.


  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Oggy Red said:
    No, Dazzler .... don't wind us up.
    He looks like a dodgy 'Make your own' FIFA character there... 
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,955
    Oggy Red said:
    Perhaps Hemed thought it was to be a loan deal with Brighton paying a percentage of his wages ?
    Perhaps whether a loan or a permanent, Hemed and CAFC didn't agree on the wages ?
    I would think this is a distinct possibility.
    It's more often than not about money.
    Despite the FA still scrutinising the deal, it's been said both Brighton and Charlton completed the paperwork, therefore they must have been signed by the player beforehand.

    The financial side must have already been agreed.


    But Oggy......was the paperwork correct for the type of deal that had been set up?
    It may well have been in on time.....in fact, thinking about it, I’m certain it was, because we’d have got a knock back almost immediately had it not been.
    I don't know anymore than you, SoundAs ...... just trying to weigh up or discount reasons for the delay.

    Your guess is as good as mine.


  • Dazzler21 said:
    Totally still at SL. 








    (Mobile Photoshop is difficult)

    To be fair had you not mentioned Photoshop I'd have believed that picture!!
  • LTKapal
    LTKapal Posts: 1,312
    Dazzler21 said:
    Totally still at SL. 








    (Mobile Photoshop is difficult)

    To be fair had you not mentioned Photoshop I'd have believed that picture!!
    Doesn't pass the height test in that picture though. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,410
    Oggy Red said:
    No, Dazzler .... don't wind us up.



    I think we should bring back flagging for this behaviour!

    @dazzler21

  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,254
    Oggy Red said:
    No, Dazzler .... don't wind us up.



    I think we should bring back flogging for this behaviour!

    @dazzler21

    Fixed that for you
  • Oggy Red said:
    No, Dazzler .... don't wind us up.



    I think we should bring back flagging for this behaviour!

    @dazzler21


    Flogging
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,885
    edited August 2019
    Oggy Red said:
    No, Dazzler .... don't wind us up.



    I think we should bring back flogging for this behaviour!

    @dazzler21

    Fixed that for you mate, just like the two previous posters did, great minds and all that ;)
  • LTKapal said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Totally still at SL. 








    (Mobile Photoshop is difficult)

    To be fair had you not mentioned Photoshop I'd have believed that picture!!
    Doesn't pass the height test in that picture though. 
    True, I've just measured him and he's only about three inches tall
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,993
    Dazzler21 said:
    Totally still at SL. 








    (Mobile Photoshop is difficult)

    To be fair had you not mentioned Photoshop I'd have believed that picture!!
    You just accepted that he's radioactive ?  :-)
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,670
    Dazzler21 said:
    Totally still at SL. 








    (Mobile Photoshop is difficult)

    To be fair had you not mentioned Photoshop I'd have believed that picture!!
    I still do.
  • IR94
    IR94 Posts: 743
    Longer this drags on less likely the deal looks
  • Redmidland
    Redmidland Posts: 44,700
    Here's an idea....how about LB has decided not to announce Hemed's signing today because when he hands in tomorrows team sheet to the ref and the opposition, they get a shock as he is shown as playing alongside Taylor up front!! 

    Oops perhaps I need my pills again!!! LOL
  • Danny Addick
    Danny Addick Posts: 3,930
    Ah please get him signed