Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…89111314…175

Comments

  • Options
    carly burncarly burn
    Court charltonised!
  • Options
    JintsJints
    I don't think the court was expecting this. Must be a risk that the hearing will be postponed because key participants can't get in
  • Options
    ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    I've jumped off, couldnt get in but think the fans need to come off now if it means this can happen today!!
  • Options
    cafcfan1990cafcfan1990
    Is it funny that Elliott can't get in? Yeah an adjournement is all we need...
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    meldrew66meldrew66
    This is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Charlton
  • Options
    ChizzChizz
    Paul Chaisty, representing ESI2 has "Real Estate Litigation" as an area of expertise. 

    Lauren Kreamer for Panorama has "insolvency" and "commercial disputes" in hers. 

    Interesting juxtaposition. 
  • Options
    PeanutsMolloyPeanutsMolloy
    edited September 2020
    Don't worry about Elliottttttt. Just strap him straight into old sparky. Guilty as charged mi lud.

  • Options
    AndyGAndyG
    Sooooooo US.... spend ages waiting them it's postponed ffs
  • Options
    NorthheathAddickNorthheathAddick
    edited September 2020
    Seems like this is playing into Elliottttts hand this....maybe this is exactly what they had planned...
    feel sick with all this...
  • Options
    J BLOCKJ BLOCK
    This is so Charlton - We screw the court date up ourselves. Christ on a bike. 
  • Options
    ProperCharltonProperCharlton
    I'm getting worried now
  • Options
    ChunesChunes
    DubaiAddickted said:
    Looks like we have a junior barrister from a top 50 firm up against a senior QC from a top 10 firm?.....
    I suppose it wouldn't be Charlton if we weren't the underdog...
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Athletico CharltonAthletico Charlton
    edited September 2020
    So QC for Elliott is Paul Chaisty and one of the instructing solicitors is Richard Cramer (I think he said)... 
    Richard seems to be from FrontRowLegal whom are registered with the FA.
  • Options
    Cafc43v3rCafc43v3r
    PragueAddick said:
    cafcfan1990 said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Worked on Curbs v West Ham!
    And Sheff U v West Ham re Tevez which presumably is where Farnell knows him from.

    Unfortunately in overall legal terms that looks like a mis-match to me but hopefully I am naive in assessing that.
    Also despite knowing Farnell, I doubt he is doing this pro bono. 

    You have to at least think you have a case to bring a gun to a knife fight. 
  • Options
    JoshrewCAFCJoshrewCAFC
    Why doesn't the court just remove everyone other than those that need to be there? 

    Also the fact they can't mute people is ridiculous. Anyone could just yell out in the middle of it... 
  • Options
    se9addickse9addick
    edited September 2020
    NorthheathAddick said:
    DubaiAddickted said:
    Looks like we have a junior barrister from a top 50 firm up against a senior QC from a top 10 firm?.....
    So....we are fucked then...🤔
    • 2010-14: BA in Jurisprudence (with Law in Europe), Magdalen College, University of Oxford
    • 2012-13: Certificat Supérieur de Droit Français et Européen, Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II)
    • 2014-15: BPTC, City University, London


    I’m pretty sure “our” solicitor is a sharp cookie. 

    Isn’t it weird that Nimer isn’t using his own counsel rather than a member of the CAST board (assuming it isn’t just a big coincidence)?
  • Options
    robinofottershawrobinofottershaw
    Bottom left it says +120 which I assume are numbers logged in? Thought Teams allowed at least 250?
  • Options
    J BLOCKJ BLOCK
    Chizz said:
    Paul Chaisty, representing ESI2 has "Real Estate Litigation" as an area of expertise. 

    Lauren Kreamer for Panorama has "insolvency" and "commercial disputes" in hers. 

    Interesting juxtaposition. 
    And sport 
  • Options
    lancashire ladlancashire lad
    given up trying to get in, leave it to the professionals
  • Options
    ct_addickct_addick
    Why wouldn't TN have used a top lawyer !!!!
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!