ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

siblers

Charlton really is the club that keeps on giving and giving, you couldn't make this up

ForeverAddickted

mattinfinland said:

Honestly, if you are on the teams, just leave . we can get updates on here via RICHARD and Airman, we don't need 125 fans there watching it

We'll be able to understand it better... I could barely understand what they were talking about in the Southall case and made sense by looking at twitter at the same time

That occasion was good to experience what goes on in court

Valley11

jacob_CAFC said:

It's not the fault of the people in the call, how could that be the case...................... it's the lobby being inundated because of how they have set this up. If there was too many fans in the actual call, they would kick people...

Who cares just get off it

Chunes

Someone's still got their bloody mic on.

meldrew66

I reckon Paul's on £500 per hour and Lauren £300 (plus VAT of course)

i_b_b_o_r_g

All I can hear is some making dinner

Jints

golfaddick said:

can anyone tell us what would happen in a normal "live" case. How many people would be allowed into an injunction hearing usually ?  If physical presence was allowed. 

Depends how big the court room is. Most hold at least 40, some are a lot bigger.

ProperCharlton

I hope I'm proven wrong but from a quick Google search it seems they have the better representative. Not looking forward to this.

Richard J

Can we stop worrying about the experience level of the Barristers. 

It does not matter as much as you think. It doesn't alter the facts of the case which is what this is about. 

No.1 in South London

22 minutes of the two hour slot already wasted................... they will do well to get a judgement today at this rate.

fadgadget

ct_addick said:

Chaisty that's another one to add to the list

Addickhead86

Good to have a match thread back. Just waiting for the dreaded no-context 'FFS.'

meldrew66

Paul looks very impatient

Dippenhall

If I got in at 2.10 why couldn’t PE

ct_addick

Surely the court can throw people out Teams if that's an issue

kentaddick

Remember a high end law firm can afford to take on a losing case like this one, smaller ones can’t. 

Chizz

FFS 


(First one of the season)

ForeverAddickted

KentishAddick said:

I hope I'm proven wrong but from a quick Google search it seems they have the better representative. Not looking forward to this.

Surely it dont matter how good your rep is... Its the evidence and what gets said that matters?

Chunes

They seem to be waiting for the judge now. Elliott was probably not joining on purpose.

meldrew66

Why does PE have to get in? He has no actual role in this process - surely he is just and interested party, like us?

allez les addicks

I dread to think what this delay costs both parties in barrister fees given they charge by the minute 😂

Callumcafc

Corner for the Addicks COYR

Jints

meldrew66 said:

I reckon Paul's on £500 per hour and Lauren £300 (plus VAT of course)

My guess £600 and £200. That would be the going rates in my field (planning) anyway. 

RodneyCharltonTrotta

Dippenhall said:

If I got in at 2.10 why couldn’t PE

Is that Southall's opening statement?

billysboots

i have been booted out more times than Johnny Williams - gonna have to rely on everyone else - keep the commentary coming 

MattF

Judge can't get in either 

meldrew66

OFFS the judge can't join now!!

ForeverAddickted

https://twitter.com/RichCawleySLP/status/1300786822050656260

Chizz

There's 1,100 people on Charlton Life right now.  Can't we just have the hearing here instead?

MattF

They're starting a new meeting with the relevant people, then letting the public join