Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Why wouldn't you just let all the relevant people in first before allowing members of the public??28
-
Everyone should try and stop getting in and let the solicitors do their work14
-
Court charltonised!3
-
Anyone know if Elliott can get in?9
-
I don't think the court was expecting this. Must be a risk that the hearing will be postponed because key participants can't get in0
-
cafcfan1990 said:ForeverAddickted said:
Unfortunately in overall legal terms that looks like a mis-match to me but hopefully I am naive in assessing that.5 -
I mean I know people want to watch but come on, if this gets delayed because of people flooding the invite...5
-
Maybe the fans should leave so they can get on with it. We need this done today one way or another15
-
I've jumped off, couldnt get in but think the fans need to come off now if it means this can happen today!!3
-
Is it funny that Elliott can't get in? Yeah an adjournement is all we need...1
- Sponsored links:
-
This is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Charlton
0 -
Paul Chaisty, representing ESI2 has "Real Estate Litigation" as an area of expertise.
Lauren Kreamer for Panorama has "insolvency" and "commercial disputes" in hers.
Interesting juxtaposition.3 -
Don't worry about Elliottttttt. Just strap him straight into old sparky. Guilty as charged mi lud.
3 -
Sooooooo US.... spend ages waiting them it's postponed ffs0
-
MattF said:Really horrible noise coming through
They're northern accents mate.32 -
Seems like this is playing into Elliottttts hand this....maybe this is exactly what they had planned...
feel sick with all this...1 -
ForeverAddickted said:So they've got a QC while PM have got Lauren Kreamer who is a fan & (was) on the Trust Board & is said to be a 'tough cookie' but only qualified as a Barrister in 2017?I hope her close knowledge of the club & hopefully PE's 'case' makes up for her relative inexperience?8
-
This is so Charlton - We screw the court date up ourselves. Christ on a bike.2
-
I'm getting worried now0
-
DubaiAddickted said:Looks like we have a junior barrister from a top 50 firm up against a senior QC from a top 10 firm?.....0
- Sponsored links:
-
I am off, all Charlton fans gett off
Adjournment is the worst possible outcome.
We need Elliott to get into the meeting11 -
So QC for Elliott is Paul Chaisty and one of the instructing solicitors is Richard Cramer (I think he said)...
Richard seems to be from FrontRowLegal whom are registered with the FA.1 -
PragueAddick said:cafcfan1990 said:ForeverAddickted said:
Unfortunately in overall legal terms that looks like a mis-match to me but hopefully I am naive in assessing that.
You have to at least think you have a case to bring a gun to a knife fight.0 -
Why doesn't the court just remove everyone other than those that need to be there?
Also the fact they can't mute people is ridiculous. Anyone could just yell out in the middle of it...4 -
NorthheathAddick said:DubaiAddickted said:Looks like we have a junior barrister from a top 50 firm up against a senior QC from a top 10 firm?.....
- 2010-14: BA in Jurisprudence (with Law in Europe), Magdalen College, University of Oxford
- 2012-13: Certificat Supérieur de Droit Français et Européen, Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II)
- 2014-15: BPTC, City University, London
I’m pretty sure “our” solicitor is a sharp cookie.Isn’t it weird that Nimer isn’t using his own counsel rather than a member of the CAST board (assuming it isn’t just a big coincidence)?4 -
Get out of it then you knobs if its causing a problem. FFS6
-
Bottom left it says +120 which I assume are numbers logged in? Thought Teams allowed at least 250?0
-
given up trying to get in, leave it to the professionals3
-
Why wouldn't TN have used a top lawyer !!!!3
This discussion has been closed.