Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
micks1950 said:ForeverAddickted said:So they've got a QC while PM have got Lauren Kreamer who is a fan & (was) on the Trust Board & is said to be a 'tough cookie' but only qualified as a Barrister in 2017?I hope her close knowledge of the club & hopefully PE's 'case' makes up for her relative inexperience?2
-
Surely standard practise should be to reserve space for those named by each party, then members of the public???5
-
ct_addick said:Why wouldn't TN have used a top lawyer !!!!2
-
It's not the public that is causing this, Teams can have 250 participants. It's the way they've set it up. People that are in already that leave aren't going to make a difference1
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Surely standard practise should be to reserve space for those named by each party, then members of the public???0
-
3 -
micks1950 said:ForeverAddickted said:So they've got a QC while PM have got Lauren Kreamer who is a fan & (was) on the Trust Board & is said to be a 'tough cookie' but only qualified as a Barrister in 2017?I hope her close knowledge of the club & hopefully PE's 'case' makes up for her relative inexperience?0
-
ForeverAddickted said:6
-
"Paul Elliot utterly humiliated by failing the court's fit and proper test and thereby being disqualified from attending his own hearing".17
- Sponsored links:
-
robinofottershaw said:Bottom left it says +120 which I assume are numbers logged in? Thought Teams allowed at least 250?0
-
Chaisty that's another one to add to the list1
-
Now chanting, "Is this a library"!2
-
Managed to get into the Teams meeting and have subsequently been kicked out. The funniest thing in the warm up was some guy shouting at his daughter to get out of the room ..... PAIGE 😂😂😂2
-
Should have held it at Port Vale mid week in December.1
-
Just left, don't want to get in the way so we get a negative result. Would recommend everyone else does the same. Nothing was happening, just a woman and a bloke occasionally popping up saying solicitors/elliott couldn't get in.3
-
I can see this being called off.
This would only happen for Charlton
We really are cursed, maybe this what PE wanted? further delay..0 -
can anyone tell us what would happen in a normal "live" case. How many people would be allowed into an injunction hearing usually ? If physical presence was allowed.0
-
Just log out for Christ’s sake. An adjournment because of technical issues would be a bloody disaster10
- Sponsored links:
-
What a blood farce.
0 -
ken_shabby said:ForeverAddickted said:1
-
And we're off0
-
Honestly, if you are on the teams, just leave . we can get updates on here via RICHARD and Airman, we don't need 125 fans there watching it14
-
EVERYONE LEAVE2
-
mattinfinland said:I can see this being called off.
This would only happen for Charlton
We really are cursed, maybe this what PE wanted? further delay..1 -
Warrant issue to Elliott for non attendance at court.9
-
Mihail and Southall both in.0
-
Bit worried about Lauren touching her face with that pen - hasn't she heard about Covid-19 avoidance?
0 -
It's not the fault of the people in the call, how could that be the case...................... it's the lobby being inundated because of how they have set this up. If there was too many fans in the actual call, they would kick people...0
This discussion has been closed.