Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Paul Chaisty looks well pissed off.0
-
robinofottershaw said:Am in.0
-
robinofottershaw said:Am in.
0 -
How fckn hard is it to switch off your mic? Jesus.9
-
Heading up towards 150 in the meeting now.0
-
Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Nadou said:jacob_CAFC said:How can this be put at the door of the fans? Absolutely absurd to suggest that.
Anyone not turning off camera & mics was neither here nor there.
It didn't proceed because the judge, solicitors & Elliot couldn't join.
This is down to the court's procedures and no one else.
At least we know who to blame.
We all want it to go ahead.1 -
ForeverAddickted said:1
-
i'm in0
-
Paul Chaisty looking pretty p****d off.2 - Sponsored links:
-
Is it possible to share the link now then?
0 -
Airman Brown said:Heading up towards 150 in the meeting now.0
-
Looks like I’ve had a banning order0
-
More mics on when they shouldn't be0
-
-
-
robinofottershaw said:
Paul Chaisty looking pretty p****d off.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Someone is playing bloody Call of Duty in the background2
-
Turn your f****** mics off0
-
This is so Charlton!
0 -
Just bought a VIP link in the lobby from some flash bloke called Stan15
-
Ok, I am back in the meeting - no camera or mic my end so felt I was not 'a risk' to proceedings. 142 in now
0 -
Will we know if it is Elliot or Elliott at the end of this?0
-
Starting the hearing now
4 -
The meeting organiser should have the ability to mute people who shouldn't have their mics on2
-
Chris Farnell in attendance0
-
Here comes the judge by the looks of it.0
This discussion has been closed.