Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Benjy Nurick@BenjyNurick·55sJudges have read the witness statements and are up to date. Paul Chaisty speaking first... #cafc0
-
Lauren Kreamer strained a calf muscle in the warm up and is replaced by Chuks Aneke
29 -
Reminds me of that time Kanu scored for Arsenal when they beat Sheffield United in the cup after playing the throw on back to keeper. Meaningless replay and hopefully the same outcome.0
-
Chaisty says that CAFC, CACT and CAST not represented here. Evidence submitted from Steve Gallen.0
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Judges have read the witness statements and are up to date. Paul Chaisty speaking first... #cafc5
-
Chaisty arguing that Gallen evidence is not relevant.0
-
Chaisty speaking, saying Gallen's evidence is not relevant. Grrr.0
-
I feel sick already3
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Chaisty arguing that Gallen evidence is not relevant.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Arry Addick said:CH4RLTON said:I cant see this taking as long as the others.
4 -
T_C_E said:I’d be a lot happier if the judges were born in woolwich and went to Bloomfield finishing school for young gentlemen. 😉
Great school, that is where I went1 -
Gallen has submitted his scout reports.7
-
To be fair, this is LD v PM and not CAFC, CACT or CAST5
-
No evidence as to what contract, price or date of completion or identity of third party, says Chaisty. Extremely important if respondent says irremediable damage if injunction granted. No evidence third party would disappear either.0
-
AdTheAddicK said:I thought justice was his first name. Did think Mr justice Arnold was a pretty fitting name for him. Now I'm disappointed.2
-
Why would PM not provide evidence? That sounds like a basic thing to be doing0
-
maybe Gallen is presenting a case of how it has impacrlted us. Ie... embargo. E... no funds to keep club going etc and has been for 8 months..7
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:No evidence as to what contract, price or date of completion or identity of third party, says Chaisty. Extremely important if respondent says irremediable damage if injunction granted. No evidence third party would disappear either.
Told ya!0 -
Feeling scared sick and nervous. Lauren will score the injury time winner and we will be champions. COYR1
- Sponsored links:
-
I can't even remember who PM is
0 -
I hate you Chaisty4
-
No evidence put forward to show club has spoken to about the position which might prevail in a range of scenarios.0
-
LK ain't spoken yet1
-
Arsenetatters said:I can't even remember who PM is18
-
So from what I'm reading... Chaisty is saying that no evidence has been provided by PM of a takeover or negotiations etc.
BUT he got the seven day injunction whilst they went to appeal because he provided evidence of there being an imminent takeover?8 -
i_b_b_o_r_g said:No evidence as to what contract, price or date of completion or identity of third party, says Chaisty. Extremely important if respondent says irremediable damage if injunction granted. No evidence third party would disappear either.2
-
Doomsday scenario disproved by the fact that the club has started the season, says Chaisty. Court left with speculation about potential consequences but with no evidence to form a view as to likelihood.0
-
Very grateful to those relaying updates on here, thanks11
-
Arsenetatters said:I can't even remember who PM is1
This discussion has been closed.