Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
I think he is technically right, I was surprised how much focus on it Pearce allowed.PeanutsMolloy said:
"Chaisty said undue consideration was given to Charlton Athletic"
And this is the QC for Elliottttt, who claims to be committed to CAFC for footballing reasons.
0 -
He just baffles,
It's very textbook, and definitely feels that way.
Tell him to shut up and sit down. Lol0 -
It's gonna be a long hour. Fucking hell.4
-
Chaisty, just shut up.4
-
If hypocrisy was a useable argument in law then Chaisty would be out in the streets in seconds. Its mind boggling that they get away with this shit3
-
Not to be a downer but I'm pretty sure they'll favour an injunction for LD. This is going to November lads6
-
I am taking comfort from TS being very relaxed about this3
-
KentishAddick said:
Maybe because PM couldn't be bothered to provide evidence?stoneroses19 said:I’m confused why the judge is saying this is the first he’s heard of any liabilities due to the club purchase. Surely he realises the club and its full content isn’t actually only worth a pound.
If there was any evidence to help the cause LK would have insisted on it being produced. PM are a complete disaster and LD are just leeches that show up after a quick killing.
Freshfields and TS with have a plan B what ever the outcome.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Not worried about this.
His repeating himself and there's no evidence.
Just words
Guy talks more then my mother and that's a hard job to do1 -
So what's the prediction? I say (positively, for once!) that nothing new came to the table and therefore...………….PM will win.
0 -
On balance, I think I would be happier if MM didn't stay as CAFC's lawyer, after TS takes over.23
-
Why are you pretty sure?ElliotCAFC said:Not to be a downer but I'm pretty sure they'll favour an injunction for LD. This is going to November lads0 -
How dare you challenge our evidence!Covered End said:0 -
shit !! Thats the time of my hospital appointment, although usually I sit around for more than an hour before being seen by the Consultant. Hopefully will have time to see the result firsti_b_b_o_r_g said:Court adjourning and resuming at 2pm.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Then why cant he prove things to the EFL?!Covered End said:5 -
Good night x4
-
Pm will win this
Don't feel nervous at all2 -
Would two judges hang one of their own out to dry on the evidence of two bent outfits?3
-
LD making the same argument again. They say Judge Pearce put too much emphasis on Charlton but they haven't proved it. Surely it is their opinion only.0
-
For what reason though? What has Chaisty said today that makes Pearce original decision incorrect?ElliotCAFC said:Not to be a downer but I'm pretty sure they'll favour an injunction for LD. This is going to November lads5 -
On what basis? What have LD bought up that Judge Pearce ignored/misinterpreted the first time? They've disagreed with his view but done very little to actually prove it wrong by letter of the law.ElliotCAFC said:Not to be a downer but I'm pretty sure they'll favour an injunction for LD. This is going to November lads0
This discussion has been closed.
