Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard on Talksport today - 17/11/20

clive
clive Posts: 19,454
edited November 2020 in General Charlton
Thomas will be speaking to Jim White before 13.00 [very shortly],it maybe a pre-recorded interview.
«134567…10

Comments

  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,454
    On now
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    https://talksport.com/radioplayer/live/
  • charlton_hero
    charlton_hero Posts: 4,665
    Farnell still involved then...
  • felix_31
    felix_31 Posts: 292
    Jim White is a joke
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    edited November 2020
    Simon Jordan was spot on again and can see through it all.  

    Jim White is just trying to make a massive drama out of the information he is being feed. 

    How is Farnell still anywhere near football. 
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,022
    edited November 2020
    Once again, well said Simon Jordan.
  • felix_31
    felix_31 Posts: 292
    felix_31 said:
    Jim White is a joke
    Jordan, however, talks so much sense and knows exactly what Elliotttt is up to

  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,978
    Actually think White is now at the stage where he’s just being a WUM. I really hope TS stops talking to him.
  • ElliotCAFC
    ElliotCAFC Posts: 2,552
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,477
    roseandcrown said:
    Simon Jordan was spot on again and can see through it all.  

    Jim White is just trying to make a massive drama out of the information he is being feed. 

    How is Farnell still anywhere near football. 
    If Thomas gets his wish and from what he was saying, it won’t be too long before he sets about changing the criteria and suitability necessary to be an owner or even a financial backer. Farnell and his ilk are set to be black balled from the world of football, might take a while for all the pieces to fall into place but Thomas seems set on getting the ball rolling at some point soon.
  • Sponsored links:



  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,220
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    I wasn’t able to listen. Who has this claim you mention come from? Elliott?
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Looking forward to Clive posting the time stamped link!
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    edited November 2020
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

    We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.
  • ElliotCAFC
    ElliotCAFC Posts: 2,552
    se9addick said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

    We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.
    I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

    He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

    Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318
    charlton_hero said:
    Farnell still involved then...
    How so? - I didnt get to listen
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    ElliotCAFC said:
    se9addick said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

    We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.
    I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

    He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

    Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 
    Right but I don’t think that relying on the clubs cash is a negative thing. A club living off of its own means is a sustainable model, that’s exactly what I want.

    What is nonsense is for any of the parties who have recently been involved to try and suggest that they would have had a better operating model for us, they wouldn’t. 
  • No.1 in South London
    No.1 in South London Posts: 3,960
    it's not important if Sandgaard has needed to put money in or not................ the point is that he HAS the money to put in to fund the ambitions he has for the club and has proved that to the EFL................... Farnell and Elliott on the other hand are comparatively potless
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Before Thomas took over, we couldn't bring in anybody and things were creaking. It can be argued we now have the strongest squad in the League.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    ElliotCAFC said:
    se9addick said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

    We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.
    I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

    He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

    Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 
    Exactly he may have re-couped cash but he spent first... 
  • Valley27000
    Valley27000 Posts: 3,417
    Thomas well said.
  • Sponsored links:



  • DagenhamAddick
    DagenhamAddick Posts: 468
    Di Jim White ask Thomas that he is 100% certain that there is no legal route that Mr Elliott can embark on now in order to take control of CAFC? That in a nutshell is the only thing I'm interested in?
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,521
    Of course Sandgaard is having to put money in - the club will be heading for multi-million £ losses this season.
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,405
    The tone of the interview(er) doesn't seem to have impressed you all that listened?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318
    DagenhamAddick said:
    Di Jim White ask Thomas that he is 100% certain that there is no legal route that Mr Elliott can embark on now in order to take control of CAFC? That in a nutshell is the only thing I'm interested in?
    Sounds too complicated a question for Jim to ask
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    But that was the exact plan, allegedly, that CF & PE were going to do.
  • MattF
    MattF Posts: 3,797
    ForeverAddickted said:
    charlton_hero said:
    Farnell still involved then...
    How so? - I didnt get to listen
    Sandgaard named Farnell as being part of what's currently going on
  • ElliotCAFC
    ElliotCAFC Posts: 2,552
    se9addick said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    se9addick said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

    We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.
    I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

    He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

    Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 
    Right but I don’t think that relying on the clubs cash is a negative thing. A club living off of its own means is a sustainable model, that’s exactly what I want.

    What is nonsense is for any of the parties who have recently been involved to try and suggest that they would have had a better operating model for us, they wouldn’t. 
    Definitely not a negative thing, it’s a sustainable business model and I’m all for it - it’s just not exactly true.  

    The libel comes in because Farnell is using the biggest sports station around to spin that Thomas Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is using player sales to keep the club afloat. That’s defamation of character and could impact the club’s or Sandgaard’s future business.


  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Call in the Danish Mafia. 
  • sunbury-addick
    sunbury-addick Posts: 1,929
    The way I took it, White made a ricket when he said TS had put no money in, I assume he meant Elliott.
  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,563
    Dazzler21 said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    se9addick said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

    Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.
    Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

    We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.
    I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

    He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

    Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 
    Exactly he may have re-couped cash but he spent first... 
    We also know that he was prepared to splash out on a striker, but we were turned down.

    Elliot and Farnell seeking a cut from the Grant and Bonne money.

    Good on TS if he has brought stability without investing anything .. gives potential funds for January or if we get promoted establishing ourselves in with a decent squad in the Chsmpionship.

Categories

“Marketplace”