Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard on Jim White show TalkSPORT today 15/12/20

124

Comments

  • SE7toSG3
    SE7toSG3 Posts: 3,140
    If Jim White stopped prefixing everything with 'Breaking news here into Talk Sport Towers, bought to you by Wicks, its where the tradesman go..Its my understanding, that, as it stands today....' then perhaps we wouldn't all have read the game had been called off on our phones before he got to break his stale old exclusive?  
  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,704
    Jim Wanker 0-10 Thomas

    Great away victory that.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,281
    Big shout out to Emma
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    Addickted said:
    So no questions from the tooth fairy or lex dominatrix?
    It is just my opinion but I feel the question about how much capital TS had put into the club was from them. JW just tried to disguise it by saying it was from a fan
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,281
    Pissed off we're not going to be an elevator club as that means Tony Keohane will never fix the lift that goes up to the museum.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,499
    Addickted said:
    So no questions from the tooth fairy or lex dominatrix?
    A pity that Thomas turned up so late......I suspect this is why White didn’t have time to relate the questions that Elliott etc were evidently asking.....not making excuses but just maybe what’s happened.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,281
    Addickted said:
    So no questions from the tooth fairy or lex dominatrix?
    I reckon White realised which way the wind was going and changed his mind.

    He'd rather be mates in the long term with Sandgaard than with Farnell.

    Plus Jordan, the twat that he is, wouldn't shut up and kept talking over TS
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,281
    Also a nice warning to Roland that if he doesn't see sense and sell at a sensible price TS has the option to leave.  Don't believe he's thinking about moving away from Valley so soon.
  • allez les addicks
    allez les addicks Posts: 1,432
    Unlike Roland, Sandgaard talks to fans.

    Unlike Southall, Sandgaard backs up talk to fans with actions. 

    This still all seems like a dream

  • Sponsored links:



  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,525
    For those that missed Thomas

    Part one begins about 17.30 minutes
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608033600/

    Part two
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608035400/
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,836
    allez les addicks said:
    Unlike Roland, Sandgaard talks to fans.

    Unlike Southall, Sandgaard backs up talk to fans with actions. 

    This still all seems like a dream
    yep.....if Carlsberg did football club owners....
  • Glovepup
    Glovepup Posts: 1,747
    clive said:
    For those that missed Thomas

    Part one begins about 17.30 minutes
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608033600/

    Part two
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608035400/

    Thanks for that. 

    Jim White describing Thomas as 'my new best friend' made me cringe. 
  • WestStandPete
    WestStandPete Posts: 73
    Can’t stand White. It’s only Jordan that makes the show worth listening to. Who would have thought we would say that at one time ?  Strange days indeed.
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,869
    Glovepup said:
    clive said:
    For those that missed Thomas

    Part one begins about 17.30 minutes
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608033600/

    Part two
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608035400/

    Thanks for that. 

    Jim White describing Thomas as 'my new best friend' made me cringe. 
    I would wager a small fortune that the feeling isn't mutual.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,175
    Thomas said one thing that definitely made my ears pick up. He said that Southall contacted Farnell when the Emirates money wasn’t coming through, and asked him if he could find someone else. That is clearly against the current settled narrative, especially Farnell’s, which says that Nimer contacted him. And “Carparkgate” backs that narrative. Maybe Thomas made a mistake there. However
    * TS is after Farnell, big time.
    * Southall certainly had the links to Farnell, even if rocky
    * whereas I often wondered who suggested Farnell, of all lawyers, to Nimer, if the goal was to stop the theft, as Farnell asserts. 

    Did I mis-hear, or mis-interpret that?
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,237
    edited December 2020
    Henry Irving said:
    Addickted said:
    So no questions from the tooth fairy or lex dominatrix?
    I reckon White realised which way the wind was going and changed his mind.

    He'd rather be mates in the long term with Sandgaard than with Farnell.

    Plus Jordan, the twat that he is, wouldn't shut up and kept talking over TS


    Didn't listen and you may just be doing your normal routine, but Simon Jordan has had our back for the last couple of years and that all that matters now. The Tango man has left the building and has supported our case consistently over recent times.
    I'm sure he has enjoyed Murray decline as they had many verbal and a legal battle over that handsome rocket scientist Dowie when he moved back up north to take over at Charlton. Iain Dowie used the same Satnav as Dale Stephens.

    Jim White is just a presenter who suits the Talk sport format. How can we will fill the time between adverts is their main agenda.

    Having an ex owner on the show is a good idea because ex players and players are the last to  know what's going on off the field.
    Only their pay and their colleagues pay is of interest to current players and their agents.

    We certainly get on the airwaves a lot for a small London team in League 1. 

    The Mountain to climb is of Himalayan size and we have only recently left base camp But at last the steps are in the right direction, up, not effing down.

    The poker game between Thomas and Duchatelet is well underway and pleased he mentioned other options will be considered other than the valley. Duchatelet can try to work out if TS is bluffing.
  • bexleyaddick
    bexleyaddick Posts: 479
    Enjoyed the comment by TS describing the Dentist' Accountant as 'just another straw man'... Jordan said it was a good analogy.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    @PragueAddick

    No way would have Southall contacted Farnell. Farnell took him to court for unpaid fees and wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

    Nimer was put in touch with Farnell, purely because of his history with Southall, knowing that Farnell would jump at the chance to get something back on him. I suspect one of the other chancers - maybe even Amis - would have known of Southall's previous.
  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,173
    clive said:
    For those that missed Thomas

    Part one begins about 17.30 minutes
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608033600/

    Part two
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608035400/
    Thanks @clive always good to hear the man, we are as fans in dreamland and Thomas is a thoroughly decent bloke.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Alex Wright
    Alex Wright Posts: 8,214
    edited December 2020
    It seems ETCYT is still a sore point with SJ. :o
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,175
    Addickted said:
    @PragueAddick

    No way would have Southall contacted Farnell. Farnell took him to court for unpaid fees and wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

    Nimer was put in touch with Farnell, purely because of his history with Southall, knowing that Farnell would jump at the chance to get something back on him. I suspect one of the other chancers - maybe even Amis - would have known of Southall's previous.
    With respect, I wasn't seeking anyone else's viewpoint on what happened. I wanted to check whether I heard right, and if so why Thomas isn't following the "settled narrative", namely that which you have just repeated.

    FWIW Amis suggested that van Seventer recommended Farnell to Nimer. But again, that's not what I'm asking.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,432
    ForeverAddickted said:
    SJ asking about the deal with Roland

    TS saying that it worked out well as the club was days from Administration so had to get the club quickly

    Dealing with the stadium etc. would have delayed things

    Saying the 15-years gives him time to see whether the Valley is worth buying or whether we go elsewhere and build a new Stadium
    First we've heard that bit... 
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    PragueAddick said:
    Addickted said:
    @PragueAddick

    No way would have Southall contacted Farnell. Farnell took him to court for unpaid fees and wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

    Nimer was put in touch with Farnell, purely because of his history with Southall, knowing that Farnell would jump at the chance to get something back on him. I suspect one of the other chancers - maybe even Amis - would have known of Southall's previous.
    With respect, I wasn't seeking anyone else's viewpoint on what happened. I wanted to check whether I heard right, and if so why Thomas isn't following the "settled narrative", namely that which you have just repeated.

    FWIW Amis suggested that van Seventer recommended Farnell to Nimer. But again, that's not what I'm asking.
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608033600/

    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608035400/

    Perhaps you may get your answer if you listen again.
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,323
    Dazzler21 said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    SJ asking about the deal with Roland

    TS saying that it worked out well as the club was days from Administration so had to get the club quickly

    Dealing with the stadium etc. would have delayed things

    Saying the 15-years gives him time to see whether the Valley is worth buying or whether we go elsewhere and build a new Stadium
    First we've heard that bit... 
    Don't believe it is 
  • letthegoodtimesroll
    letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,653
    edited December 2020
    Alex Wright said:
    It seems ETCYT is still a sore point with SJ. :o
    More likely he no longer sees Charlton as a basket case to be ‘sympathised’ with under TS and normal service can be resumed as far as the relationship between the two sets of fans are concerned of which he is a palace fan. Wait til TS gets shown clips of ‘we’ll never play you again’ and ‘we sent the palace down’ being belted out and he plays those tunes on his electric guitar, jimi Hendrix style...
  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,120
    Any mention of the £500k that Elliott claims he’s owed? 
  • letthegoodtimesroll
    letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,653
    I was listening the the broadcast, honest, but did JW actually read out any of the questions from the other parties ?
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,016
    edited December 2020
    PragueAddick said:
    Thomas said one thing that definitely made my ears pick up. He said that Southall contacted Farnell when the Emirates money wasn’t coming through, and asked him if he could find someone else. That is clearly against the current settled narrative, especially Farnell’s, which says that Nimer contacted him. And “Carparkgate” backs that narrative. Maybe Thomas made a mistake there. However
    * TS is after Farnell, big time.
    * Southall certainly had the links to Farnell, even if rocky
    * whereas I often wondered who suggested Farnell, of all lawyers, to Nimer, if the goal was to stop the theft, as Farnell asserts. 

    Did I mis-hear, or mis-interpret that?
    I suspect it could be a misunderstanding or malaproper, the whole can of worms that was ESI vs. LD and all of them eating each other alive and everyone stabbing every back in reach probably confuses things somewhat. I have a feeling treating any incarnation of ESI or LD as united fronts is in error, they were all out for themselves only.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,175
    Addickted said:
    PragueAddick said:
    Addickted said:
    @PragueAddick

    No way would have Southall contacted Farnell. Farnell took him to court for unpaid fees and wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

    Nimer was put in touch with Farnell, purely because of his history with Southall, knowing that Farnell would jump at the chance to get something back on him. I suspect one of the other chancers - maybe even Amis - would have known of Southall's previous.
    With respect, I wasn't seeking anyone else's viewpoint on what happened. I wanted to check whether I heard right, and if so why Thomas isn't following the "settled narrative", namely that which you have just repeated.

    FWIW Amis suggested that van Seventer recommended Farnell to Nimer. But again, that's not what I'm asking.
    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608033600/

    https://talksport.com/radio/listen-again/1608026400/1608035400/

    Perhaps you may get your answer if you listen again.
    I'd rather not have to, if it's all the same to you, as I am busy working on the website right now. I was hoping somebody else might confirm that I heard correctly. If so, we can take it from there, if not then the settled narrative stands, albeit with several unclear aspects, some of which Farnell uses to his advantage with journalists - and that is why this is important, at least to me.

    Anyone else recall hearing what I heard?

Categories

“Marketplace”