Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Thomas Funds
Comments
-
Covers the play-off final and assumes it goes to extra time.EugenesAxe said:
2hrs funding, that’s not going to last much past 120 minutes.addick1956 said:I thought Thomas said he put 2 hrs funding in up front as requested by EFL. £21 Million squids. Plus buying the club and legal fees and one player purchase, Schwartz.5 -
No, he didn’t put the funding in ‘up front’. He had to prove he had funding for two years (source and sufficiency), and I seem to recall he deposited a significant sum into an escrow account to cover the purchase transaction.addick1956 said:I thought Thomas said he put 2 hrs funding in up front as requested by EFL. £21 Million squids. Plus buying the club and legal fees and one player purchase, Schwartz.
5 -
Ok thanks.bobmunro said:
No, he didn’t put the funding in ‘up front’. He had to prove he had funding for two years (source and sufficiency), and I seem to recall he deposited a significant sum into an escrow account to cover the purchase transaction.addick1956 said:I thought Thomas said he put 2 hrs funding in up front as requested by EFL. £21 Million squids. Plus buying the club and legal fees and one player purchase, Schwartz.0 -
Are we now being financed by the Vatican ?Henry Irving said:
Even with a Papal windfall.....10 -
Yep just pop down to the bank & ask to see the glass case with TS's piles of cashValley27000 said:
Can we see it somewhere?.SuedeAdidas said:Who says he hasn't already?1 -
I'll be a bit worried if he makes an announcement every time he puts money into the club.5
-
Is Thomas Funds correct? Should we not say Thomas' funds or Thomases' funds?
(Asking for a friend).2 -
The Pope’s sell on clause.golfaddick said:
Are we now being financed by the Vatican ?Henry Irving said:
Even with a Papal windfall.....6 -
I’ve heard he’s locked in talks with the Jehovah’s, but they only want him if he brings his mo-bile with him...guinnessaddick said:
The Pope’s sell on clause.golfaddick said:
Are we now being financed by the Vatican ?Henry Irving said:
Even with a Papal windfall.....0 -
I am that friend.Raith_C_Chattonell said:Is Thomas Funds correct? Should we not say Thomas' funds or Thomases' funds?
(Asking for a friend).
More interesting is the concept of hourly funding. Presumably this could also apply to the players' contracts ... paid by the hour.
It might explain the Chuks situation. And the proliferation of late goals and/or penalty misses.2 -
Sponsored links:
-
I've heard that the next 2 hours will be criticalEugenesAxe said:
2hrs funding, that’s not going to last much past 120 minutes.addick1956 said:I thought Thomas said he put 2 hrs funding in up front as requested by EFL. £21 Million squids. Plus buying the club and legal fees and one player purchase, Schwartz.
3 -
Does anyone know exactly what the extra 9.3 million operating costs after wages actually were?Cafc43v3r said:
If you look at the 2018/19 seasons accounts the key things are.Athletico Charlton said:Be interested to know airmans views but Bonne, Phillips; Doughty and Grant would have netted about c£6m. Take off say £500k on transfers in. Then you have solidarity payments, a small amount of commercial income from ValleyPass, shop etc and an extra Covid payment from the PL if i recall correctly. Combine that with a low salary bill, much reduced costs for putting games on without fans I am guessing and maybe Covid rates relief of some sort and we might not be too far off breaking even.
hopefully TS also took the opportunity through the rent moratorium to have paid RD precisely no rent whatsoever under the lease obligations to date.
Income
Central payments 1.5 million, match day 4.1 million, commercial 1.3 million and other 0.8 million. Total operating income £7.8 million.
Player sales also accounted for 2.9 million.
Costs
Wages, including all staff, academy etc £10.4 million. Total operating costs, including wages was £19.7 million.
Loss
Just over £10 million quid.
This seasons player sales probably cover the 18/19 play sales most of the lost match day revenue (remember that includes the play offs as well).
I can't see how you can get anywhere near break even?
Does it include interest payments to the banks and/or Roland? Do we still have to pay these.0 -
Give us our club back Thomas. We need transparency! We are used to dashcam videos of our boardroom.1
-
I don't know exactly, but I could hazard a guess that in addition to utilities (gas, electricity, water) and business rates for both The Valley and Sparrows Lane, there would be quite a hefty maintenance bill, including relaying the pitch at The Valley. There would be insurance costs, and maybe an annual structural survey of the stadium.stevexreeve said:
Does anyone know exactly what the extra 9.3 million operating costs after wages actually were?Cafc43v3r said:
If you look at the 2018/19 seasons accounts the key things are.Athletico Charlton said:Be interested to know airmans views but Bonne, Phillips; Doughty and Grant would have netted about c£6m. Take off say £500k on transfers in. Then you have solidarity payments, a small amount of commercial income from ValleyPass, shop etc and an extra Covid payment from the PL if i recall correctly. Combine that with a low salary bill, much reduced costs for putting games on without fans I am guessing and maybe Covid rates relief of some sort and we might not be too far off breaking even.
hopefully TS also took the opportunity through the rent moratorium to have paid RD precisely no rent whatsoever under the lease obligations to date.
Income
Central payments 1.5 million, match day 4.1 million, commercial 1.3 million and other 0.8 million. Total operating income £7.8 million.
Player sales also accounted for 2.9 million.
Costs
Wages, including all staff, academy etc £10.4 million. Total operating costs, including wages was £19.7 million.
Loss
Just over £10 million quid.
This seasons player sales probably cover the 18/19 play sales most of the lost match day revenue (remember that includes the play offs as well).
I can't see how you can get anywhere near break even?
Does it include interest payments to the banks and/or Roland? Do we still have to pay these.
Knowing Roland, I expect he would also have included the Sparrows Lane improvements done that year, sticking that onto the accumulating Staprix debt.
Then there are additional team-related costs such as travel to away games, overnight stays, kit & equipment purchase and maintenance, cost of residential summer training week. There are also, presumably, non-wage costs associated with running the Academy (was that the year Roland stopped providing bottled water?)
Whether or not Roland had a rolling program for replacement of essential admin equipment such as office computers is questionable.
I'm sure others could add to this list!0 -
It should be Thomas's funds - which incidentally are stashed in Tidmouth Sheds.Raith_C_Chattonell said:Is Thomas Funds correct? Should we not say Thomas' funds or Thomases' funds?
(Asking for a friend).
1 -
Still seems a hell of a lot to me. Two hundred thousand pounds each and every week! No regular spending seems to come close to that.N01R4M said:
I don't know exactly, but I could hazard a guess that in addition to utilities (gas, electricity, water) and business rates for both The Valley and Sparrows Lane, there would be quite a hefty maintenance bill, including relaying the pitch at The Valley. There would be insurance costs, and maybe an annual structural survey of the stadium.stevexreeve said:
Does anyone know exactly what the extra 9.3 million operating costs after wages actually were?Cafc43v3r said:
If you look at the 2018/19 seasons accounts the key things are.Athletico Charlton said:Be interested to know airmans views but Bonne, Phillips; Doughty and Grant would have netted about c£6m. Take off say £500k on transfers in. Then you have solidarity payments, a small amount of commercial income from ValleyPass, shop etc and an extra Covid payment from the PL if i recall correctly. Combine that with a low salary bill, much reduced costs for putting games on without fans I am guessing and maybe Covid rates relief of some sort and we might not be too far off breaking even.
hopefully TS also took the opportunity through the rent moratorium to have paid RD precisely no rent whatsoever under the lease obligations to date.
Income
Central payments 1.5 million, match day 4.1 million, commercial 1.3 million and other 0.8 million. Total operating income £7.8 million.
Player sales also accounted for 2.9 million.
Costs
Wages, including all staff, academy etc £10.4 million. Total operating costs, including wages was £19.7 million.
Loss
Just over £10 million quid.
This seasons player sales probably cover the 18/19 play sales most of the lost match day revenue (remember that includes the play offs as well).
I can't see how you can get anywhere near break even?
Does it include interest payments to the banks and/or Roland? Do we still have to pay these.
Knowing Roland, I expect he would also have included the Sparrows Lane improvements done that year, sticking that onto the accumulating Staprix debt.
Then there are additional team-related costs such as travel to away games, overnight stays, kit & equipment purchase and maintenance, cost of residential summer training week. There are also, presumably, non-wage costs associated with running the Academy (was that the year Roland stopped providing bottled water?)
Whether or not Roland had a rolling program for replacement of essential admin equipment such as office computers is questionable.
I'm sure others could add to this list!
Overnight stays may be expensive for 20 players but even at £1000 per player that's still only £20,000 every fortnight and just a dent in that week's £200,000.
Obviously we are paying over £1 million per year to rent the valley from Roland but even that only works at around £25,000 per week.
You can buy a hell of lot of laptops for 9 million quid!
0 -
Thomas' or Thomas's are technically both correct, although the former is sufficient to indicate possession. Not Thomases' - unless it is possessed by more than one Thomas.Raith_C_Chattonell said:Is Thomas Funds correct? Should we not say Thomas' funds or Thomases' funds?
(Asking for a friend).
I'll get me coat.1 -
I'm not sure you can read too much into the filed accounts. Obviously they would be true and accurate but as is the way with such things accounts can be made to show many different pictures depending on what the company is looking to achieve1
-
It's quite hard to break down to specifics. There is 300k on training ground improvements, 67k in staff restructuring, just short of a million in loan repayments, a couple of million in depreciation and amortisation.stevexreeve said:
Still seems a hell of a lot to me. Two hundred thousand pounds each and every week! No regular spending seems to come close to that.N01R4M said:
I don't know exactly, but I could hazard a guess that in addition to utilities (gas, electricity, water) and business rates for both The Valley and Sparrows Lane, there would be quite a hefty maintenance bill, including relaying the pitch at The Valley. There would be insurance costs, and maybe an annual structural survey of the stadium.stevexreeve said:
Does anyone know exactly what the extra 9.3 million operating costs after wages actually were?Cafc43v3r said:
If you look at the 2018/19 seasons accounts the key things are.Athletico Charlton said:Be interested to know airmans views but Bonne, Phillips; Doughty and Grant would have netted about c£6m. Take off say £500k on transfers in. Then you have solidarity payments, a small amount of commercial income from ValleyPass, shop etc and an extra Covid payment from the PL if i recall correctly. Combine that with a low salary bill, much reduced costs for putting games on without fans I am guessing and maybe Covid rates relief of some sort and we might not be too far off breaking even.
hopefully TS also took the opportunity through the rent moratorium to have paid RD precisely no rent whatsoever under the lease obligations to date.
Income
Central payments 1.5 million, match day 4.1 million, commercial 1.3 million and other 0.8 million. Total operating income £7.8 million.
Player sales also accounted for 2.9 million.
Costs
Wages, including all staff, academy etc £10.4 million. Total operating costs, including wages was £19.7 million.
Loss
Just over £10 million quid.
This seasons player sales probably cover the 18/19 play sales most of the lost match day revenue (remember that includes the play offs as well).
I can't see how you can get anywhere near break even?
Does it include interest payments to the banks and/or Roland? Do we still have to pay these.
Knowing Roland, I expect he would also have included the Sparrows Lane improvements done that year, sticking that onto the accumulating Staprix debt.
Then there are additional team-related costs such as travel to away games, overnight stays, kit & equipment purchase and maintenance, cost of residential summer training week. There are also, presumably, non-wage costs associated with running the Academy (was that the year Roland stopped providing bottled water?)
Whether or not Roland had a rolling program for replacement of essential admin equipment such as office computers is questionable.
I'm sure others could add to this list!
Overnight stays may be expensive for 20 players but even at £1000 per player that's still only £20,000 every fortnight and just a dent in that week's £200,000.
Obviously we are paying over £1 million per year to rent the valley from Roland but even that only works at around £25,000 per week.
You can buy a hell of lot of laptops for 9 million quid!
So in truth some of it is a paper loss. But that's an actual loss in value of Sarr, BFG, Igor etc for who we paid a fee. Worth a mention that the playing squad was valued at under £1 million at the end of the year, at least I think that's what it says. It's quite hard reading a 30 page PDF on my phone.0 -
It would be right and proper to include that as an expense in the accounts. He could have put equity, not debt, in to cover it however.N01R4M said:
I don't know exactly, but I could hazard a guess that in addition to utilities (gas, electricity, water) and business rates for both The Valley and Sparrows Lane, there would be quite a hefty maintenance bill, including relaying the pitch at The Valley. There would be insurance costs, and maybe an annual structural survey of the stadium.stevexreeve said:
Does anyone know exactly what the extra 9.3 million operating costs after wages actually were?Cafc43v3r said:
If you look at the 2018/19 seasons accounts the key things are.Athletico Charlton said:Be interested to know airmans views but Bonne, Phillips; Doughty and Grant would have netted about c£6m. Take off say £500k on transfers in. Then you have solidarity payments, a small amount of commercial income from ValleyPass, shop etc and an extra Covid payment from the PL if i recall correctly. Combine that with a low salary bill, much reduced costs for putting games on without fans I am guessing and maybe Covid rates relief of some sort and we might not be too far off breaking even.
hopefully TS also took the opportunity through the rent moratorium to have paid RD precisely no rent whatsoever under the lease obligations to date.
Income
Central payments 1.5 million, match day 4.1 million, commercial 1.3 million and other 0.8 million. Total operating income £7.8 million.
Player sales also accounted for 2.9 million.
Costs
Wages, including all staff, academy etc £10.4 million. Total operating costs, including wages was £19.7 million.
Loss
Just over £10 million quid.
This seasons player sales probably cover the 18/19 play sales most of the lost match day revenue (remember that includes the play offs as well).
I can't see how you can get anywhere near break even?
Does it include interest payments to the banks and/or Roland? Do we still have to pay these.
Knowing Roland, I expect he would also have included the Sparrows Lane improvements done that year, sticking that onto the accumulating Staprix debt.
Then there are additional team-related costs such as travel to away games, overnight stays, kit & equipment purchase and maintenance, cost of residential summer training week. There are also, presumably, non-wage costs associated with running the Academy (was that the year Roland stopped providing bottled water?)
Whether or not Roland had a rolling program for replacement of essential admin equipment such as office computers is questionable.
I'm sure others could add to this list!0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Interest charges have been succeeded by much increased rent payments to Roland.I’ve made the point before that at times even if the players had played for free under Roland the club would still have made a loss.1
-
Are you Doubting Thomas by any chance ?Valley27000 said:
Can we see it somewhere?.SuedeAdidas said:Who says he hasn't already?1










