Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1326327329331332867

Comments

  • I feel like the Simms rumour came from one poster mentioning him as an option and another mentioning that he and Adkins were at Southampton together... No rumour was ever spoken.
  • Premier league within five years is looking a bit optimistic atm…… why say that? All it did was raise expectations! 
    If you didn't think it was optimistic then, you're a fool.
  • Loving that bench from the Crewe game though. Five attacking (or at least, 'progressive') midfielders! 
  • edited July 2021
    Leuth said:
    Loving that bench from the Crewe game though. Five attacking (or at least, 'progressive') midfielders! 
    That's because at that stage we didn't have our other players yet, in reality that bench was dangerously inexperienced and ill equipped to benefit us if required in defensive positions. Admittedly we were still under restrictions thanks to the EFL.
  • Comparing us with a year ago and saying we are in a better place is  hardly a great compliment, seeing that we were under a transfer embargo at the time, and facing the abyss due to the ownership

    And I don't see much difference in the quality of the 2 starting 11s, other than the defence (due to Pearce being injured and Lockyer exercising his option to leave). That 2020 front 3 was decent enough and the 2020 team while lacking defenders on the bench had some great creative options 
  • Sponsored links:


  • So we're comparing a line up from a pre season game in early July, to a possible first team in August, OK, that's some stretch. 

    We've probably got 3-4 more loans to come in, I suspect 3-4 more signings, there is still a lot of movement to be done. 
  • Probably stuck on the M1 somewhere...
  • MattF said:
    Chief sports writer for the local Portsmouth paper so Cawley's counterpart for Pompey.
  • edited July 2021
    .
  • Didn’t Thomas say that he wanted a player that would get us out of our seats and on our feet ? We certainly haven’t signed that player yet. Still plenty of time but it does look to me that the window and recruitment have been much more difficult than perhaps we thought. 
  • Rothko said:
    So we're comparing a line up from a pre season game in early July, to a possible first team in August, OK, that's some stretch. 

    We've probably got 3-4 more loans to come in, I suspect 3-4 more signings, there is still a lot of movement to be done.  
    The comparison was last season's first game to now... and highlighting that we are already looking better and have a month til the first game.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Didn’t Thomas say that he wanted a player that would get us out of our seats and on our feet ? We certainly haven’t signed that player yet. Still plenty of time but it does look to me that the window and recruitment have been much more difficult than perhaps we thought. 
    But equally he must've known then that players like that don't come cheap. Thomas is a football man.  No player like that is going to come for a free pair of boots and a 12 chip lunch.
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Premier league within five years is looking a bit optimistic atm…… why say that? All it did was raise expectations! 
    If you didn't think it was optimistic then, you're a fool.
    Said tongue in cheek!  Would rather play down expectations than big them up. Guess TS is quite Americanised now & it’s their way!  
    Still expecting some good signings though, long way to go! 
  • edited July 2021
    Accounts are over due aren't they?

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01788466

    Isn't that an automatic embargo now?




  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Accounts are over due aren't they?

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01788466

    Isn't that an automatic embargo now?




    Saw that on Airmans Twitter feed yesterday.  It is not a great sign to have poor house keeping.
  • edited July 2021
    Didn’t Thomas say that he wanted a player that would get us out of our seats and on our feet ? We certainly haven’t signed that player yet. Still plenty of time but it does look to me that the window and recruitment have been much more difficult than perhaps we thought. 
    But equally he must've known then that players like that don't come cheap. Thomas is a football man.  No player like that is going to come for a free pair of boots and a 12 chip lunch.
    Agree, unless there is a nice portion of cod and mushy peas included B)
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Accounts are over due aren't they?

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01788466

    Isn't that an automatic embargo now?




    Saw that on Airmans Twitter feed yesterday.  It is not a great sign to have poor house keeping.
    In fairness companies house if often a bit behind, they probably submitted the accounts before they became overdue but the website hasn’t yet caught up.
  • edited July 2021
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Accounts are over due aren't they?

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01788466

    Isn't that an automatic embargo now?




    Saw that on Airmans Twitter feed yesterday.  It is not a great sign to have poor house keeping.
    In fairness companies house if often a bit behind, they probably submitted the accounts before they became overdue but the website hasn’t yet caught up.
    Agreed re CH delays, but the point is that they have flagged them as late, which they would only do if they weren't received by the deadline of June 30th. They wouldn't flag them as late before the deadline, because that makes no sense. They could have gone in since and the status not yet been updated, but only since the flag was raised.
  • Just for back ground Gillingham were placed under an embargo a month after their accounts were due.  However there is also the issue of the monitored loan which I don't think we took.

    We wouldn't have been able to sign Stockley for a fee, if that was the case.

    Although the accounts would be very messy a lot of it should/would/could have been unravelled in the due diligence work that was undertaken.

    They are going to be very embarrassing for a number of people. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Loving that bench from the Crewe game though. Five attacking (or at least, 'progressive') midfielders! 
    That's because at that stage we didn't have our other players yet, in reality that bench was dangerously inexperienced and ill equipped to benefit us if required in defensive positions. Admittedly we were still under restrictions thanks to ESI
    Fixed that for ya. 
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!