Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)
Comments
-
Now it might be the morning coffee buzz I'm currently experiencing but after a few days of despair I'm feeling mildly optimistic this morning.
We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
We signed Kirk and I bet we paid a decent fee for him so I'm relatively hopeful that we'll be looking to spend some more dough on some decent players and not just League 2 cast offs. They may well sign but I hope they're seen as a gamble squad type player as opposed to a first 11 starter.
I'll let you know how I feel in 20 mins when the coffee wears off.3 -
Chunes said:How would we sign a player from India? We can't even sign players from Europe.0
-
Chunes said:We know that Sandgaard passes his eye over players and approves/disapproves based on ability. We've been told so a few times. I personally think that's insane. He has no professional footballing background and is essentially now at the top of our scouting heirarchy, giving the final yes or no. He shouldn't have put himself in that position.
Leave the player selection to them that know (i hope) Thomas.2 -
Happy to be corrected, but wasn't Airman's point about sponsorship backing in terms of money coming in? Sandgaard has stated that he was looking for partners and that can mean something completely different. I suspect that he had one when we were going to blow the league away and for whatever reason, we don't have that one now.
I'm not stating this as fact but it would explain a lot of things. And indeed, in some ways would temper expectations, which were built up by the club whether we like it or not. Sandgaard surely has the ability to find another partner, but in the meantime I would imagine we would be far more understanding of less ambitious objectives. For this reason, I can't see why he wouldn't come clean unless it is pride.5 -
ShootersHillGuru said:Chunes said:How would we sign a player from India? We can't even sign players from Europe.0
-
I really can't see how a sponsorship deal would affect a League 1 club that much. No doubt it would add some stability and even give TS an extra reason to grow the club, but I really cannot imagine a deal being so large that it would change the strategy in terms of transfers.3
-
MuttleyCAFC said:Happy to be corrected, but wasn't Airman's point about sponsorship backing in terms of money coming in? Sandgaard has stated that he was looking for partners and that can mean something completely different. I suspect that he had one when we were going to blow the league away and for whatever reason, we don't have that one now.
I m not stating this as fact but it would explain a lot of things. And indeed, in some ways would temper expectations, which were built up by the club whether we like it or not. Sandgaard surely has the ability to find another partner, but in the meantime I would imagine we would be far more understanding of less ambitious objectives. For this reason, I can't see why he wouldn't come clean unless it is pride.
I don't think he needs to be informing all and sundry on every single thing that may or may not happen frankly.3 -
SELR_addicks said:Renewing Pearce and Watson looks like an even dumber move in hindsight thanks to this squad cap.
Willingly having poor players in the side that Adkins himself admitted weren't good enough.1 -
thenewbie said:MuttleyCAFC said:Happy to be corrected, but wasn't Airman's point about sponsorship backing in terms of money coming in? Sandgaard has stated that he was looking for partners and that can mean something completely different. I suspect that he had one when we were going to blow the league away and for whatever reason, we don't have that one now.
I m not stating this as fact but it would explain a lot of things. And indeed, in some ways would temper expectations, which were built up by the club whether we like it or not. Sandgaard surely has the ability to find another partner, but in the meantime I would imagine we would be far more understanding of less ambitious objectives. For this reason, I can't see why he wouldn't come clean unless it is pride.
I don't think he needs to be informing all and sundry on every single thing that may or may not happen frankly.
For me, the worry started when we were not mopping up the players on our books that we wanted to keep. JFC didn't seem happy with what he was being offered and there were some other signs that you could read or not read into the situation.
I agree, he doesn't need to involve us in negotiations he is now having, but he could explain why we have a weak squad now and get more understanding and time from the fans. We could see booing on Saturday and just some clarification on where we are and where we still plan to be might help prevent that.0 -
Ged Roddy takes off his mask in true scooby doo style to reveal Paul Elliott.10
-
Sponsored links:
-
eaststandmike said:SELR_addicks said:Renewing Pearce and Watson looks like an even dumber move in hindsight thanks to this squad cap.
Willingly having poor players in the side that Adkins himself admitted weren't good enough.1 -
I have been critical of Clare, but as a back up player to bring energy on the pitch the signing makes sense.3
-
MuttleyCAFC said:I have been critical of Clare, but as a back up player to bring energy on the pitch the signing makes sense.0
-
Maybe we can compare them this Saturday?0
-
Clare has a first touch that doesn't go 10 yards tbf0
-
eaststandmike said:SELR_addicks said:Renewing Pearce and Watson looks like an even dumber move in hindsight thanks to this squad cap.
Willingly having poor players in the side that Adkins himself admitted weren't good enough.2 -
Give Clare a chance. I think he’ll be a grower. Will revisit this post in six weeks and eat humble pie, or not.12
-
Aren't there other threads for all this waffle?31
-
ken_shabby said:eaststandmike said:SELR_addicks said:Renewing Pearce and Watson looks like an even dumber move in hindsight thanks to this squad cap.
Willingly having poor players in the side that Adkins himself admitted weren't good enough.3 -
JamesSeed said:Give Clare a chance. I think he’ll be a grower. Will revisit this post in six weeks and eat humble pie, or not.13
-
Sponsored links:
-
BR7_addick said:JamesSeed said:Give Clare a chance. I think he’ll be a grower. Will revisit this post in six weeks and eat humble pie, or not.21
-
So not a hint of a rumour after Tuesday’s shambles, once again I’ve been very positive until now but it seems we really are letting this current mob have a crack at promotion plus a few loan players that could range from Josh Cullen to Dylan Levitt, all a bit risky if you ask me, considering there’s been a lot more Levitt’s than Cullen’s arrive at sparrows lane.3
-
Gravesend_Addick said:BR7_addick said:JamesSeed said:Give Clare a chance. I think he’ll be a grower. Will revisit this post in six weeks and eat humble pie, or not.1
-
Bolderhumphreyreid said:We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.3
-
Chunes said:Bolderhumphreyreid said:We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.Trouble ‘t mill.1
-
MuttleyCAFC said:Happy to be corrected, but wasn't Airman's point about sponsorship backing in terms of money coming in? Sandgaard has stated that he was looking for partners and that can mean something completely different. I suspect that he had one when we were going to blow the league away and for whatever reason, we don't have that one now.
I'm not stating this as fact but it would explain a lot of things. And indeed, in some ways would temper expectations, which were built up by the club whether we like it or not. Sandgaard surely has the ability to find another partner, but in the meantime I would imagine we would be far more understanding of less ambitious objectives. For this reason, I can't see why he wouldn't come clean unless it is pride.Airman Brown said:
The deal (by Mumford not Roddy) was overhyped but it is not a sponsorship deal and it has been done. It will be announced in due course. It was never going to have any impact on the transfer budget.J BLOCK said:What did happen with that sponsorship deal he was working on. I know businesses at the Charlton golf day who were shocked at what happened with the current deal.2 -
4
-
Chunes said:Bolderhumphreyreid said:We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.1
-
Chunes said:Bolderhumphreyreid said:We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.0
-
JamesSeed said:Chunes said:Bolderhumphreyreid said:We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.Trouble ‘t mill.1
This discussion has been closed.