Would you sign any of our loanees this season permanently..?

No. The most disappointing part of a disappointing season. All terrible, except Famewo who was merely disappointing. 

Keep Famewo if the price/salary is right. He could develop with us, the rest, well it's a hell no from me.

I'm also inclined to say Famewo. I don't think he is as bad as some make out. 

If Elliott Lee was a free transfer then maybe, at a push. Another one who I think at least has a bit of something about him on his day. 

carly burn said:

cafctom said:

I'm also inclined to say Famewo. I don't think he is as bad as some make out. 

If Elliott Lee was a free transfer then maybe, at a push. Another one who I think at least has a bit of something about him on his day. 

 Famewo has some serious heads gone moments.
To get out of this shit pit our back four is going to have to be as solid as a rock. I like Lavelle and really think a good solid,reliable partner alongside him could be the key.
I don't see Famewo as that person

Have you been in a coma? We don’t play a back 4 anymore and no chance that changes under Jacko. 

Famewo - I think he’ll develop into a good defender but he’s frustrating on the ball. If the agreed fee is £500k that’s a lot to spend on someone who isn’t a guaranteed starter.

Lee - with Gilbey and Morgan under contract and promising u18s coming through in time we don’t need more squad players for CM. We also don’t play a 10 and he’s not good enough to change the system to fit him in.

Leko - big disappointment even with the formation not being ideal for him.

Burstow - not good enough to start for us, the striker we bring in needs to properly challenge Stockley, Washington and Aneke, and ideally be better than any of them.

Castillo and John - no comment needed.

golfaddick said:

To all those saying No to all of them........you do know that means replacing 6 players in addition to the 5 or 6 that will be released/ wont re-sign. A dozen new players to come in. Good luck in getting them all to gel, especially when most wont be signing until close to the season starting.....and the loanees close to the transfer deadline (which will be after 4 or 5 games have already been played). 

FWIW- I'd sign Famewo & Lee. We wont be able to do much better.

Wigan signed 21 players and are top of the league

ForeverAddickted said:

addick1956 said:

Cafc43v3r said:

Addick Addict said:

Decent loan signings are out there and we've had a few very good ones - the likes of Cullen, Bielik, Gallagher and Dasilva to name four. We should have a decent handle on the ones at PL London clubs and those four all came from there but the ones we've been sent recently seem to have been part of some sort of bizarre agreement just to get them off their host club's books - Castillo and John have made two appearances between them - presumably because they have too many of that ilk and ability.

Castillo is the one that made most sense, on the face of it, when we first signed him.  We didn't really have a natural left wing back.  Out of contract in the summer, good age, pedigree etc etc.

Then the real reason we signed him came up....... 

What was that ? I missed that then.

There is the claim we only signed Castillo as part of the deal to sign Aneke

Birmingham wanted him off their hands, Chelsea wouldn't take him back

Did the Aneke deal and us taking Castillo, directly lead to them picking up Lyle Taylor?
Strange how these things come back round. Also if that is the case, I imagine it would wind up a fair few in our fan base who particularly don't like Taylor for understandable reasons.

no-one worth a permanent deal as I see it

Comeonyoureds said:

ForeverAddickted said:

addick1956 said:

Cafc43v3r said:

Addick Addict said:

Decent loan signings are out there and we've had a few very good ones - the likes of Cullen, Bielik, Gallagher and Dasilva to name four. We should have a decent handle on the ones at PL London clubs and those four all came from there but the ones we've been sent recently seem to have been part of some sort of bizarre agreement just to get them off their host club's books - Castillo and John have made two appearances between them - presumably because they have too many of that ilk and ability.

Castillo is the one that made most sense, on the face of it, when we first signed him.  We didn't really have a natural left wing back.  Out of contract in the summer, good age, pedigree etc etc.

Then the real reason we signed him came up....... 

What was that ? I missed that then.

There is the claim we only signed Castillo as part of the deal to sign Aneke

Birmingham wanted him off their hands, Chelsea wouldn't take him back

Did the Aneke deal and us taking Castillo, directly lead to them picking up Lyle Taylor?
Strange how these things come back round. Also if that is the case, I imagine it would wind up a fair few in our fan base who particularly don't like Taylor for understandable reasons.

Them getting Taylor ment Chuks was avaliable so it depends which way you look at it. 

seth plum said:

golfaddick said:

To all those saying No to all of them........you do know that means replacing 6 players in addition to the 5 or 6 that will be released/ wont re-sign. A dozen new players to come in. Good luck in getting them all to gel, especially when most wont be signing until close to the season starting.....and the loanees close to the transfer deadline (which will be after 4 or 5 games have already been played). 

FWIW- I'd sign Famewo & Lee. We wont be able to do much better.

Don’t you think replacements might arrive from our in house development system?

Frankly....No. 

That was Adkins mantra last season, so much so Deji played quite a few pre-season games & we was told he was going to be part of the plan going forward. 

Now, with a few games to go & nothing to play for the youngsters still arent being "bloodied" in.....with Pearce (out of contract) playing instead of said Deji and Burstow (not one of ours) playing instead of Kanu. 

There is no joined up thinking....and no semblance of a plan. 

People saying Famewo ain't been watching the games I have. He is woeful.

I wouldn’t sign any of them. Akin is a liability. The dribbling out from the back. No thanks. 

charltonkeston said:

We had had some good loans in the past but we have slipped too far down the leagues to attract decent players, hence the the poor show this season. I wouldn’t keep any of the present loans, they’ve added very little to Charlton. I doubt we would have gone down without them, we certainly never looked like contenders for anything other than mid-table also rans. 
Next season I would prefer journeymen players on frees rather than the premiership hopefuls who don’t deliver. 

I’m sure it’s more about money than how long we’ve been at this level. Has been said TS won’t pay for the more expensive Prem loans. He also won’t spend as much on agent fees as some clubs at this level.

Who were the best Prem loanees in L1 this season? Did we miss out on another Bielik and Cullen?