Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard ownership discussion 2022-3 onwards (Meeting with CAST p138)

12467…170

Comments

  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,534
    Fanny Fanackapan said:
    Gribbo said:
    Fanny Fanackapan said:
    That's a very balanced view of the current issues, CE & one which I'm pretty certain that the majority of "TS haters" will align with.

    I have to stop myself from pressing the "lol" button when those that question our owner's modus operandi as described as haters.

    That's extremely lazy &, IMO, emotive language which in NO way describes the concerns many have regarding the sustainability of the current methods used by TS. 

    TBH, I'll leave it there as I can't be a*sed to repeat the reasons that I, for one, have for doubting Thomas.....

    And I sincerely hope that, sooner rather than later ( too late ?) & if promotion aspirations continue to fall short, he will have the b*lls to finally admit that he needs to take some much needed advice on how to run a successful football club. 

    I trust that those "TS lovers" out there will agree that the use of certain phrases or indeed words, will only serve to widen the divide between fans that dare to have differing opinions.    
    Do you not maybe think there are some on the other side of this, who possibly feel the same the other way?
    Explain, please.
    Do you not think there are people who disagree with you and would like to lol some if the opposing views.

    Also, from a neutral pov, there's seem to be quite a few getting accused of being in TS' corner or standing with him, just for not jumping on the bandwagon and going for every anti rumour that does the rounds
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,079
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,476
    ForeverAddickted said:
    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-owner-sandgaard-gives-sell-on-verdict-over-keepers-move-to-newcastle-united/
    Doesn’t answer the question many will be hoping he will. Either way we’ll have a good idea based on how the squad looks after the window has closed.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    edited July 2022
    Scoham said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-owner-sandgaard-gives-sell-on-verdict-over-keepers-move-to-newcastle-united/
    Doesn’t answer the question many will be hoping he will. Either way we’ll have a good idea based on how the squad looks after the window has closed.
    He's certainly learning... If he says its going back into the running of the club he'll add fuel to the fire that he's skint or only interested in making a profit.

    If he says it will go on players, then valuations / wage demands get doubled - Says nothing at all for a while and he surely starts to be compared to Roland as a disinterested owner

    He is damned either way really.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Six-a-bag-of-nuts
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts Posts: 8,133
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    Because it's what we wanted to hear. Guilty as charged.
    But I genuinely thought he would have made a better fist of it.
  • SE10Addick
    SE10Addick Posts: 2,967
    I've not got too much to add here pro or anti TS except that I know a relation of Andrew Barclay. 

    He's a good guy, has the absolute best intentions for the club, but the investment to buy Charlton wasn't just from family money. It's not coming out of his Coutts bank account.

    There were a bunch of people and institutions who were prepared to finance him - through loans etc.

    Now anyone involved in finance and M&A will know that that is perfectly normal and acceptable, but he would not have been able to just go out and spend a fortune willy nilly on players. 

    He might have spent more than TS, but conversely, he might have spent a lot less.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,273
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    Nothing wrong with Charlton fans having long and good memories. Didn’t do young Paddy any harm when he won a few grand on the Chase 
  • Six-a-bag-of-nuts
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts Posts: 8,133
    Barclay out.
    Oh wait. Barclay in/out.  ;)

  • Sponsored links:



  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,534
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    Because it's what we wanted to hear. Guilty as charged.
    But I genuinely thought he would have made a better fist of it.
    Me too mate, but reality soon kicked in. Still don't necessarily blame TS for getting myself over excited though.

    I spend too much time being angry at those who (allegedly) intentionally went out their way to mislead the fan base and continued to do so for as long as they could get away with it, in order to line their own pockets. 
  • DagenhamAddick
    DagenhamAddick Posts: 468
    He is determined to balance the books. He's clearly had a good look at the financial potential of the club over the last two years and is now cutting his cloth accordingly. It's his mission to achieve this based on what he's told me. I also agree 100% with him. I don't agree with a lot of what he has done and really don't like the more public side of his persona and as for the guitar stuff. On the whole I'm not a fan of show offs no matter who and where they've come from and I personally do not expect any individual to spend crazy money on the club. Football at our level has to sort itself out and I for one would love CAFC to financially straighten itself out as part of this. Ultimately the clubs with the largest and richest fanbase will succeed that's just the way the cookie crumbles.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,501
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    Barclay out.
    Oh wait. Barclay in/out.  ;)
    Barclay shake it all about?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    aliwibble said:
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    Barclay out.
    Oh wait. Barclay in/out.  ;)
    Barclay shake it all about?

  • WhenIwasLittleBoy
    WhenIwasLittleBoy Posts: 5,430
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
  • Six-a-bag-of-nuts
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts Posts: 8,133
    edited July 2022
    Gribbo said:
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    Because it's what we wanted to hear. Guilty as charged.
    But I genuinely thought he would have made a better fist of it.
    Me too mate, but reality soon kicked in. Still don't necessarily blame TS for getting myself over excited though.

    I spend too much time being angry at those who (allegedly) intentionally went out their way to mislead the fan base and continued to do so for as long as they could get away with it, in order to line their own pockets. 
    I also think that Tommy, unreasonably, is bearing the brunt of frustration and anger accumulated over years of funky ownership and mismanagement.
    The sheer delight at his takeover was quickly followed by "right we are sorted, lets get on with it". Success. NOW!
    His " Blowing League One out of the water" maybe unwittingly fanned the flames of that and now the slow and steady sensible approach (not yet working) has fuelled some impatience/ire.
    I admit I am currently immensely impatient and unreasonably so I am sure, but I want to see signs of progress now and I'll be having a good moan if I don't.  ;)

    Edit: Perhaps I should specify "signs of progress", because of course there are many. Sorry.
    I meant a serious promotion challenge.
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,534
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    Gribbo said:
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    Because it's what we wanted to hear. Guilty as charged.
    But I genuinely thought he would have made a better fist of it.
    Me too mate, but reality soon kicked in. Still don't necessarily blame TS for getting myself over excited though.

    I spend too much time being angry at those who (allegedly) intentionally went out their way to mislead the fan base and continued to do so for as long as they could get away with it, in order to line their own pockets. 
    I also think that Tommy, unreasonably, is bearing the brunt of frustration and anger accumulated over years of funky ownership and mismanagement.
    The sheer delight at his takeover was quickly followed by "right we are sorted, lets get on with it". Success. NOW!
    His " Blowing League One out of the water" maybe unwittingly fanned the flames of that and now the slow and steady sensible approach (not yet working) has fuelled some impatience/ire.
    I admit I am currently immensely impatient and unreasonably so I am sure, but I want to see signs of progress now and I'll be having a good moan if I don't.  ;)

    Edit: Perhaps I should specify "signs of progress", because of course there are many. Sorry.
    I meant a serious promotion challenge.
    👍
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    I don't trust the Sandgaard family with our club but I don't want TS gone.

    The first team is work in progress and I will not decide on it until the transfer window closes, but so far I'm not sure that the manager and his recruits will result in promotion, but it is unfinished and I hope it improves in players and tactics.

    I never believed TS's early pronouncements but to me he has not proved his ability to understand English football or our club, the recruitment of his wife and son is concerning and his inability to learn from his mistakes is a worry.Yes he saved the club for which I am grateful and he has spent his own money improving SL and subsidising the club's running costs.

    I didn't trust ESI and for reasons I can't articulate I don't trust TS but I do hope he proves me wrong.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,476
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
    Suspect he was asked the question and has answered it without confirming whether any money will be reinvested in the days.

    I expect this season many will be saying Leaburn came through our academy despite joining our u16s, and yet Lookman who signed about a year older apparently doesn’t count.

    You could argue anyone signing for our u23 team (u21 when Pope signed I think) makes a player part of our academy since they didn’t come straight into the first team. It’s an academy team even if the players are pro by that age.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,079
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    I certainly believed that we would be putting together a squad aiming to win the league, why wouldn't I?
    Yes I thought the Premier League was optimistic.

  • Sponsored links:



  • WhenIwasLittleBoy
    WhenIwasLittleBoy Posts: 5,430
    Scoham said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
    Suspect he was asked the question and has answered it without confirming whether any money will be reinvested in the days.

    I expect this season many will be saying Leaburn came through our academy despite joining our u16s, and yet Lookman who signed about a year older apparently doesn’t count.

    You could argue anyone signing for our u23 team (u21 when Pope signed I think) makes a player part of our academy since they didn’t come straight into the first team. It’s an academy team even if the players are pro by that age.
    Charlton paid a compensation package to Bury Town after he had a two week trial. 
    Was Leaburn and Lookman signed from a club with a fee ? 
  • Jonniesta
    Jonniesta Posts: 1,161
    edited July 2022
    Don't mind admitting to be a Sandgaard 'fan', because most of the things people seem to find offensive, e.g. over-enthusiasm on projections, guitar playing, fan engagement, has always just made me think he's a positive guy who wants Charlton to be another positive. Also think the removal of ESI and the subsequent rebuild is a lot bigger job than he perhaps gets credit for. Plus the conspiracy theories used to beat him with... John Marquis, anyone?... are weird.
    That said, I agree with the posters who point out that it's about results. Last year we were crap. This summer, to date, we've spent nothing. I don’t see enough goal threat in this side yet, and if we fail this year due to lack of goals I think he, Martin, Gallen etc will have some serious questions to answer. But I also have faith they know that, and can't believe we'll hit deadline day without 4 or 5 more signings, with maybe 2 or 3 heading out. 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,079
    Ah yes John Marquis who few fans wanted.
    But would he have been a better option than Farkin Noone?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Scoham said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
    Suspect he was asked the question and has answered it without confirming whether any money will be reinvested in the days.

    I expect this season many will be saying Leaburn came through our academy despite joining our u16s, and yet Lookman who signed about a year older apparently doesn’t count.

    You could argue anyone signing for our u23 team (u21 when Pope signed I think) makes a player part of our academy since they didn’t come straight into the first team. It’s an academy team even if the players are pro by that age.
    Charlton paid a compensation package to Bury Town after he had a two week trial. 
    Was Leaburn and Lookman signed from a club with a fee ? 
    Leaburn was released from Chelsea @ U16 level, and subsequently joined us.

    Lookman joined from a Sunday League side, also prior to U18 level, which put both firmly into the Academy.
  • WhenIwasLittleBoy
    WhenIwasLittleBoy Posts: 5,430
    ForeverAddickted said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Scoham said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
    Suspect he was asked the question and has answered it without confirming whether any money will be reinvested in the days.

    I expect this season many will be saying Leaburn came through our academy despite joining our u16s, and yet Lookman who signed about a year older apparently doesn’t count.

    You could argue anyone signing for our u23 team (u21 when Pope signed I think) makes a player part of our academy since they didn’t come straight into the first team. It’s an academy team even if the players are pro by that age.
    Charlton paid a compensation package to Bury Town after he had a two week trial. 
    Was Leaburn and Lookman signed from a club with a fee ? 
    Leaburn was released from Chelsea @ U16 level, and subsequently joined us.

    Lookman joined from a Sunday League side, also prior to U18 level, which put both firmly into the Academy.
    I never said that they never came through the academy, what I stated is that Pope didn't. A fee was paid for him. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    edited July 2022
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Scoham said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
    Suspect he was asked the question and has answered it without confirming whether any money will be reinvested in the days.

    I expect this season many will be saying Leaburn came through our academy despite joining our u16s, and yet Lookman who signed about a year older apparently doesn’t count.

    You could argue anyone signing for our u23 team (u21 when Pope signed I think) makes a player part of our academy since they didn’t come straight into the first team. It’s an academy team even if the players are pro by that age.
    Charlton paid a compensation package to Bury Town after he had a two week trial. 
    Was Leaburn and Lookman signed from a club with a fee ? 
    Leaburn was released from Chelsea @ U16 level, and subsequently joined us.

    Lookman joined from a Sunday League side, also prior to U18 level, which put both firmly into the Academy.
    I never said that they never came through the academy, what I stated is that Pope didn't. A fee was paid for him. 
    Does it matter if a fee is paid though - Age is the only thing that should matter?

    The fee shows we were respectful to Bury Town - Rather than trying to poach him, as how many Non-League players (let alone kids) are on proper Contracts, especially beyond the National Leagues
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,476
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Scoham said:
    WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
    Somewhat miffed, does he not know that Pope was not from our youth academy ? Why would you openly declare that you had a little windful as now I am sure that a selling may just bump their price up for a player should we make a bid. 
    He may have also made a rod for his own back if none of the funds go back into the team to strengthen squad.
    The question that the fans will ask if we have a bad start is "What happened to the Pope money?"
    The squad as it stands is smaller than that of last season, and he stated at the end of last season we would go into 2022-23 fully prepared and not make the same mistakes as we did  last season, on Saturday he now stats that we wont be signing anyone before the start of season and wait for loans.
    Would it not be better to keep quiet, but if you do decide to make statements to stick to them ?
    Suspect he was asked the question and has answered it without confirming whether any money will be reinvested in the days.

    I expect this season many will be saying Leaburn came through our academy despite joining our u16s, and yet Lookman who signed about a year older apparently doesn’t count.

    You could argue anyone signing for our u23 team (u21 when Pope signed I think) makes a player part of our academy since they didn’t come straight into the first team. It’s an academy team even if the players are pro by that age.
    Charlton paid a compensation package to Bury Town after he had a two week trial. 
    Was Leaburn and Lookman signed from a club with a fee ? 
    Irrelevant really, if Chelsea pay a fee for an u12 player who plays all the way through to u23 he’d have come through their academy.

    Pope spent part of his development within one of our academy teams by making appearances for our u21 side and spending time training with that squad which was ran by academy coaches.

    I know there’s no exact definition, it’s just interesting that Leaburn counts but Lookman doesn’t despite it perhaps being a matter of months (in terms of their age) between when they signed for us.
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,534
    Covered End said:
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    I certainly believed that we would be putting together a squad aiming to win the league, why wouldn't I?
    Yes I thought the Premier League was optimistic.
    Supopse it depends on where your starting point is on the expectation scale. 


  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,786
    Gribbo said:
    Covered End said:
    I'm waiting for one of our local journos to ask TS about where we now stand with blowing this league out of the water and being in The Premier League in what is now 4 years I believe?
    Still gobsmacked that people who claim to have followed Charlton and English football in general for years and years, took him at his word on that, and didn't just give him a squeeze for getting over excited about the takeover at the time. 
    I can understand a 6 year old getting excited at xmas when they are opening their presents but a 60 year old businesman who is in charge of the cheques should know better. If he wasn't going to splash the cash (and no reason why he should - its his money) then best not say anything or did he somehow think we were going to be worldbeaters by bringing in 19 year old loanees or players with injury records as long as your arm. 

Categories

“Marketplace”