Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Premier League 22/23
Comments
-
What a save from Sanchez0
-
Rashford ahowing again how shit he has become.0
-
Good save, but Rashford shouldn’t have given him any chance.Chris_from_Sidcup said:What a save from Sanchez0 -
Potter to replace Southgate, when the time comes?4
-
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore
Edit - meant highest net spend, a few teams have spent more but generated much higher in player sales1 -
Surprised by that, would've thought City had spent more. How much have they spent?cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore0 -
Yeah sorry have corrected to net spend, City have spent 1.8, not too much between them to be fairChris_from_Sidcup said:
Surprised by that, would've thought City had spent more. How much have they spent?cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore0 -
But one of the reasons Man United (well anyone actually) were so successful for so long was they generate much more income than almost anyone else. I bet their budget is relatively (compared to everyone else) smaller than it was 15 years ago.cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore
Edit - meant highest net spend, a few teams have spent more but generated much higher in player sales
On the net spend they have been awful at selling players, as bad as they have been at buying them.0 -
Of course but whilst the owners are clearly quite controversial and not liked, they still spend over 100 million every summer. City are miles ahead of the likes of Utd purely because they’ve spent it much betterCafc43v3r said:
But one of the reasons Man United (well anyone actually) were so successful for so long was they generate much more income than almost anyone else. I bet their budget is relatively (compared to everyone else) smaller than it was 15 years ago.cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore
Edit - meant highest net spend, a few teams have spent more but generated much higher in player sales
On the net spend they have been awful at selling players, as bad as they have been at buying them.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Rashford is nicking a living at this point. Body language is atrocious.1
-
Because of the miracle Fergy pulled off in winning his last title it glossed over the early lack of investment. Look what Moyes was promised and what he ended up getting.cafcfan1990 said:
Of course but whilst the owners are clearly quite controversial and not liked, they still spend over 100 million every summer. City are miles ahead of the likes of Utd purely because they’ve spent it much betterCafc43v3r said:
But one of the reasons Man United (well anyone actually) were so successful for so long was they generate much more income than almost anyone else. I bet their budget is relatively (compared to everyone else) smaller than it was 15 years ago.cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore
Edit - meant highest net spend, a few teams have spent more but generated much higher in player sales
On the net spend they have been awful at selling players, as bad as they have been at buying them.
City, and Liverpool, just have to top up and refresh, United need a Chris Powell style rebuild.
Pogba sums United up, cost a fortune, none of the managers knew what to do with him and leaves on a free, again. Compare to City who effectively paid for Haaland by selling Sterling and Torres.0 -
Yup. He needs to decide whether he wants a career in politics or football.ValleyGary said:Rashford is nicking a living at this point. Body language is atrocious.
Also clear to a blind man Ronaldo wants out. Why keep him -and pay him £500k a week - when it would be better all round to move him on.2 -
Even Gilbey would be an upgrade on those 2 clowns……Chris_from_Sidcup said:
I know they've been laughably persisting in chasing de Jong for about 3 months but they really should've moved on and signed someone else weeks ago.ricky_otto said:
I think you are being kind there. Their midfield is embarrassing. The right back is absolutely dreadful. They can change as many managers as they like, but if you persist with those 2 jokers in midfield, there is no hope.ForeverAddickted said:Wow Man Utd look utter shit
Notice that Sarmiento is on the bench for Brighton
Could've got Bissouma for 30m, make a bid for Ruben Neves?
….may have had a few beers…..2 -
They'd be happy to get rid but no one else wants him!Fortune 82nd Minute said:
Yup. He needs to decide whether he wants a career in politics or football.ValleyGary said:Rashford is nicking a living at this point. Body language is atrocious.
Also clear to a blind man Ronaldo wants out. Why keep him -and pay him £500k a week - when it would be better all round to move him on.0 -
Absolutely.Rothko said:Potter to replace Southgate, when the time comes?0 -
Ten Hag won't be able to fix things overnight but they badly need a proper defensive midfielder and a striker.
Right back too but the other 2 need to be their priority.0 -
We could do a player + cash deal with Stockley. Trouble is I don’t think that would want to offer money as well as Ronny.North Lower Neil said:
They'd be happy to get rid but no one else wants him!Fortune 82nd Minute said:
Yup. He needs to decide whether he wants a career in politics or football.ValleyGary said:Rashford is nicking a living at this point. Body language is atrocious.
Also clear to a blind man Ronaldo wants out. Why keep him -and pay him £500k a week - when it would be better all round to move him on.0 -
But you, I and anyone who watches Premier League football could have told you in May that United need to strengthen those areas as a priority. Why have we got to August and they still haven’t sorted themselves out despite some big salaries moving off of their wage bill this summer?North Lower Neil said:Ten Hag won't be able to fix things overnight but they badly need a proper defensive midfielder and a striker.
Right back too but the other 2 need to be their priority.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Sat by the pool on holiday. Behind the hedge and across the road was a bar showing the game. All I could hear was northerners getting more and more irate as the game went on.5
-
Yep it's been daft, spent an age chasing De Jong when they should have just let that go, too.se9addick said:
But you, I and anyone who watches Premier League football could have told you in May that United need to strengthen those areas as a priority. Why have we got to August and they still haven’t sorted themselves out despite some big salaries moving off of their wage bill this summer?North Lower Neil said:Ten Hag won't be able to fix things overnight but they badly need a proper defensive midfielder and a striker.
Right back too but the other 2 need to be their priority.1 -
It's a world away from the likes of us, but in todays market spending 100m every summer isn't that out of the ordinary and certainly not for a club of United's size with their revenue. For the level they want to be at, that's one world class player these days. Players they could really do with, like Kane or Declan Rice would cost even more.cafcfan1990 said:
Of course but whilst the owners are clearly quite controversial and not liked, they still spend over 100 million every summer. City are miles ahead of the likes of Utd purely because they’ve spent it much betterCafc43v3r said:
But one of the reasons Man United (well anyone actually) were so successful for so long was they generate much more income than almost anyone else. I bet their budget is relatively (compared to everyone else) smaller than it was 15 years ago.cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore
Edit - meant highest net spend, a few teams have spent more but generated much higher in player sales
On the net spend they have been awful at selling players, as bad as they have been at buying them.
As you say though their issue isn't really how much they spend, it's how badly they spend it. City, Liverpool, Chelsea, Spurs and now probably Arsenal too have spent far better in recent seasons.0 -
Palace training ground wasting water. Surely must be worth a 20 points deduction.
1 -
Haaland is off and running, the first of many.0
-
Released by Liverpool as a youngster and a fan tooSELR_addicks said:0 -
Rodri is Some player. Running this game at his own pace.0
-
I agree, it’s not an over the top amount when you consider revenue. But everyone thinks City continue to buy titles but Utd have lost more money in the last decade. I can’t believe how badly it’s been spent, other than Bruno I’m struggling to think of anyone who turned out to be decent business. Wan-Bissaka, Fred and Lindelof cost about 150 between them!Chris_from_Sidcup said:
It's a world away from the likes of us, but in todays market spending 100m every summer isn't that out of the ordinary and certainly not for a club of United's size with their revenue. For the level they want to be at, that's one world class player these days. Players they could really do with, like Kane or Declan Rice would cost even more.cafcfan1990 said:
Of course but whilst the owners are clearly quite controversial and not liked, they still spend over 100 million every summer. City are miles ahead of the likes of Utd purely because they’ve spent it much betterCafc43v3r said:
But one of the reasons Man United (well anyone actually) were so successful for so long was they generate much more income than almost anyone else. I bet their budget is relatively (compared to everyone else) smaller than it was 15 years ago.cafcfan1990 said:
Man Utd have spent 1.4 billion in the past 11 years, the most in EuropeCafc43v3r said:
If you put over a billion into one club and take over a billion out of another that's what happens.Rothko said:In the space of 10 years the gap between United and City is about 50, the two clubs aren’t even close on the pitch anymore
Edit - meant highest net spend, a few teams have spent more but generated much higher in player sales
On the net spend they have been awful at selling players, as bad as they have been at buying them.
As you say though their issue isn't really how much they spend, it's how badly they spend it. City, Liverpool, Chelsea, Spurs and now probably Arsenal too have spent far better in recent seasons.
0 -
Has Roy Keane been living under a bridge for a couple of months?5
-
Man City are going to win the league by about 50 points this season
2
