Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
POST-MATCH THREAD: Charlton Athletic vs Cheltenham Town: Tuesday 28th November 2023 | KO 19:45
Comments
-
Camara, yes, but not sure about Taylor.SDAddick said:
I think Camara and/or Taylor have the ability to be that/those midfielder(s). I think that because we didn't see a lot of them we underestimate how much they are missed.JamesSeed said:I think signing a high quality midfielder in January (plus a striker and maybe a centre back) would revitalise our season.But sadly, as every year, I doubt it will happen.1 -
I think a fit and firing Taylor would be an upgrade on McGrandles both in terms of mobility and distribution. I think he'd give us some of that defensive solidity in midfield, and also help with retaining possession.JamesSeed said:
Camara, yes, but not sure about Taylor.SDAddick said:
I think Camara and/or Taylor have the ability to be that/those midfielder(s). I think that because we didn't see a lot of them we underestimate how much they are missed.JamesSeed said:I think signing a high quality midfielder in January (plus a striker and maybe a centre back) would revitalise our season.But sadly, as every year, I doubt it will happen.
Whether we see that player this season, I don't know. Obviously the worry for him and Camara is that when they come back they'll both have played very little football in about a year.0 -
I've looked it again, he shuffles back then forward, miss reads the flight of the ball and the player scores just inside the the six yard box. For me that's a goalkeeping error.WrightCharlie said:
I don't think he had time to come for the cross...... he took a step or two back to protect his goal so he didn't get caught out by the cross/shot going over/behind him....... when the cross came in it was hit quite hard and I don't think had time to get there......?ForeverAddickted said:
I was focusing on the fact that had we closed down the initial cross, neither Defenders nor Goalkeeper (Given those two have been getting the most blame) should have had anything to worry about.Bailey said:
Could AMB come for the cross ?ForeverAddickted said:
Another observation to the goal that I've only just spottedCroydon said:Their goal:
Why is Dobson (?) marking Jones so tightly? - Or is it the other way round
If he's closer to the crosser... there are three options for the man on the ball
Out wide to the right, and Edun can mark him - Tries a through ball to the bloke between Hector and Jones, and the latter can potentially cut out the pass. - Passes to the right, and Fraser / McGrandles can deal with him
The amount of room the bloke with the assist is in... Is criminal in itself.0 -
Hasn’t Taylor only played in a couple of games? Hard to know what’s he’s like as a player if that’s true.SDAddick said:
I think a fit and firing Taylor would be an upgrade on McGrandles both in terms of mobility and distribution. I think he'd give us some of that defensive solidity in midfield, and also help with retaining possession.JamesSeed said:
Camara, yes, but not sure about Taylor.SDAddick said:
I think Camara and/or Taylor have the ability to be that/those midfielder(s). I think that because we didn't see a lot of them we underestimate how much they are missed.JamesSeed said:I think signing a high quality midfielder in January (plus a striker and maybe a centre back) would revitalise our season.But sadly, as every year, I doubt it will happen.
Whether we see that player this season, I don't know. Obviously the worry for him and Camara is that when they come back they'll both have played very little football in about a year.0 -
Yes, you're probably right. The whole thing looks like a good defensive lesson for the team....... which someone else has already said....... apologies can't remember who...... no tracking back on the guy who crossed, headed clearance not the best, no closing down the opportunity to cross and then the space and lack of challenge on the guy who scored.Bailey said:
I've looked it again, he shuffles back then forward, miss reads the flight of the ball and the player scores just inside the the six yard box. For me that's a goalkeeping error.WrightCharlie said:
I don't think he had time to come for the cross...... he took a step or two back to protect his goal so he didn't get caught out by the cross/shot going over/behind him....... when the cross came in it was hit quite hard and I don't think had time to get there......?ForeverAddickted said:
I was focusing on the fact that had we closed down the initial cross, neither Defenders nor Goalkeeper (Given those two have been getting the most blame) should have had anything to worry about.Bailey said:
Could AMB come for the cross ?ForeverAddickted said:
Another observation to the goal that I've only just spottedCroydon said:Their goal:
Why is Dobson (?) marking Jones so tightly? - Or is it the other way round
If he's closer to the crosser... there are three options for the man on the ball
Out wide to the right, and Edun can mark him - Tries a through ball to the bloke between Hector and Jones, and the latter can potentially cut out the pass. - Passes to the right, and Fraser / McGrandles can deal with him
The amount of room the bloke with the assist is in... Is criminal in itself.
On the bright side it's lessons learned all round and we still got all 3 points.2 -
Apart from a two game run of defeats, we have become hard to beat under Appleton. In a way, we will have bad performances or at least disjointed ones and what I think pleased Appleton is we got 3 points from this one. What I have noticed is the poorer teams try to break the game up which stops us flowing and we need to find a way around that as it is going to happen with a lot of teams we play in this division.0
-
Yes, I think your last sentence is part of what MA was getting at when he talked about the win being his most pleasing one so far.MuttleyCAFC said:Apart from a two game run of defeats, we have become hard to beat under Appleton. In a way, we will have bad performances or at least disjointed ones and what I think pleased Appleton is we got 3 points from this one. What I have noticed is the poorer teams try to break the game up which stops us flowing and we need to find a way around that as it is going to happen with a lot of teams we play in this division.0 -
Very true, we used to be a pushover in some games, especially after going a goal down. We would basically give up. We are much harder to beat now.MuttleyCAFC said:Apart from a two game run of defeats, we have become hard to beat under Appleton. In a way, we will have bad performances or at least disjointed ones and what I think pleased Appleton is we got 3 points from this one. What I have noticed is the poorer teams try to break the game up which stops us flowing and we need to find a way around that as it is going to happen with a lot of teams we play in this division.
ed - I take this back. Worst post I ever wrote.0 -
We were dreadful today but we have been hard to beat. And I think the weakest areas are not that hard to see. A big one unfortunately is Ness (I hate saying it and it isn't fair playing the lad currently but we know what he can do) but he is a complete liability at the moment. I think playing him was Appleton's biggest mistake today. That was the aspect of the team that worried me before kick off. Today reminded me a bit of Lincoln away were they were physical and had more desire. That was sort of addressed and in the short term it can be addressed again but we need to make changes and hope they fill the gaps that are clearly there in the squad and we have to hope and believe Appleton knows what is needed. I think he probably does.1
