Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Premier League 24/25
Comments
-
Ten hag has spent 600m+ and is today fielding Leicester's 18/19 centre back pairing
1 -
He's also benched Ugarte who was supposedly the missing piece they needed in midfield and he's starting Eriksen instead. It's like he's given up and just wants the sack and a pay off now
0 -
Looks like ten Hag has already been relegated to a new role before the Villa game even reached HT
13 -
Chris_from_Sidcup said:He's also benched Ugarte who was supposedly the missing piece they needed in midfield and he's starting Eriksen instead. It's like he's given up and just wants the sack and a pay off now
Ten Hag: If I gave you any thought I probably would1 -
It's good to see one of the Premier League strugglers raise their game against one of the Champions League giants, and grind out a point...0
-
Incredible second yellow for James Ward-Prowse in the other game1
-
Incredible game at Brighton. 2 0 down at half time against Spurs, now 3 2 up. Spurs all over the place.2
-
Blimey. Wasnt expecting that at HT.
Went to pick up my daughter from a birthday party and by the time I got back I saw Wellbeck getting the third.
That was a capitulation for the ages!0 -
They maybe deserve that for the kit0
-
JohnBoyUK said:Blimey. Wasnt expecting that at HT.
Went to pick up my daughter from a birthday party and by the time I got back I saw Wellbeck getting the third.
That was a capitulation for the ages!
Spurs looked quality in the 1st half and just fell to pieces in the 2nd.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Watched the end of the golf cos couldn’t watch with spurs 0-2 up , golf finished nowt else to watch and that beauty of a second half arrives , loved it .
The sheer weight of Spurs knowing Arsenal are gonna win the Premier League crushed spurs , give the gooner cnuts the title now , it’s done ffs0 -
blackpool72 said:JohnBoyUK said:Blimey. Wasnt expecting that at HT.
Went to pick up my daughter from a birthday party and by the time I got back I saw Wellbeck getting the third.
That was a capitulation for the ages!
Spurs looked quality in the 1st half and just fell to pieces in the 2nd.
Awful mistake from Udogie for the first Brighton goal that gives them hope. And whoever it was (Bentancur?) for the third goal has to show more desire to dive in and block the cross to Welbeck.
Ange must be tearing his hair out, he's set his side up to come away with a good win and terrible individual mistakes have somehow meant they lost.1 -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq5eyvl7nggo
So... I'm still none the wiser.
Anyone got the laymans guide to this?!
0 -
JohnBoyUK said:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq5eyvl7nggo
So... I'm still none the wiser.
Anyone got the laymans guide to this?!
In essence, the idea of the ATP rules is to stop clubs being able to hide owners providing cash injections via sponsorships. They were brought in to stop state owned clubs using state owned companies to pay over the odds sponsorship deals. Real analysis will come in a few days as the document is 175 pages long, any journalist with a definitive view is probably being fed information from one side to spin. In seems like City won on a few points but the PL have won bigger, they just aren't selling it well. The framework and idea of the ATP rules are supported, the way they are written and applied is where City have won. They just need to be rewritten and then likely voted on by the PL.
I hope that helps a little bit.1 -
JohnBoyUK said:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq5eyvl7nggo
So... I'm still none the wiser.
Anyone got the laymans guide to this?!City - Chelsea, Newcastle, Everton
PL - Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Brighton, West Ham0 -
stoneroses19 said:JohnBoyUK said:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq5eyvl7nggo
So... I'm still none the wiser.
Anyone got the laymans guide to this?!City - Chelsea, Newcastle, Everton
PL - Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Brighton, West Ham
Also interesting to look at their (assumed) motivations
City - Chelsea: Hedgefunders with lots of companies but who can never get a shirt sponsor, Newcastle: State owned, Everton: Mid takeover but previously effectively owned by one Russian bloke in the background
PL - Man Utd: Billionaire who mainly cost cuts, Liverpool: Americans who don't like to put their own money in, Arsenal: Americans who didn't invest for a long time, Spurs: Team with a lot of income from outside of football ventures (NFL, concerts etc.) & transfer income, Brighton: Great in the transfer market - best profits in the league, West Ham: don't know enough but up for sale?0 -
Anyone else think that Bournemouth to be relegated at 12/1 (16.5 on Betfair) might be a bit of value? Yes I am fully aware that Southampton, Leicester and Ipswich are nailed on to be in the dogfight and that the likes of Wolves, Palace and Everton could be in the melting pot too but Bournemouth did lose 19 goal Solanke and the 8 points they secured were at home to Southampton (3) and Newcastle (1) and away to Everton (3) and Forest (1). The draw at Forest was as a result of an 87th minute equaliser and the win at Everton was that bizarre game in which the home side capitulated to the extent that they conceded three goals in the final five minutes or so. Bournemouth lost at home to Chelsea and away to Liverpool and Leicester.
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.0 -
Addick Addict said:Anyone else think that Bournemouth to be relegated at 12/1 (16.5 on Betfair) might be a bit of value? Yes I am fully aware that Southampton, Leicester and Ipswich are nailed on to be in the dogfight and that the likes of Wolves, Palace and Everton could be in the melting pot too but Bournemouth did lose 19 goal Solanke and the 8 points they secured were at home to Southampton (3) and Newcastle (1) and away to Everton (3) and Forest (1). The draw at Forest was as a result of an 87th minute equaliser and the win at Everton was that bizarre game in which the home side capitulated to the extent that they conceded three goals in the final five minutes or so. Bournemouth lost at home to Chelsea and away to Liverpool and Leicester.
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.4 -
Arsenal with their third red card of the season after last man Saliba pulls down the advancing Bournemouth attacker0
-
Tick tock, tick tock........I feel someone is going to be moaning shortly about the PL not wanting Arsenal to win the title11
- Sponsored links:
-
sam3110 said:Arsenal with their third red card of the season after last man Saliba pulls down the advancing Bournemouth attacker0
-
12 -
Arsenal never get refereeing decisions go their way.
Shhhh. Stop giggling at the back there.4 -
Addick Addict said:Anyone else think that Bournemouth to be relegated at 12/1 (16.5 on Betfair) might be a bit of value? Yes I am fully aware that Southampton, Leicester and Ipswich are nailed on to be in the dogfight and that the likes of Wolves, Palace and Everton could be in the melting pot too but Bournemouth did lose 19 goal Solanke and the 8 points they secured were at home to Southampton (3) and Newcastle (1) and away to Everton (3) and Forest (1). The draw at Forest was as a result of an 87th minute equaliser and the win at Everton was that bizarre game in which the home side capitulated to the extent that they conceded three goals in the final five minutes or so. Bournemouth lost at home to Chelsea and away to Liverpool and Leicester.
Bournemouth's next three matches are Arsenal (H), Villa (A) and City (H). They will be expected to probably lose all three matches and any points gained will be a plus.2 -
Hahahhaha currently in Mexico where it has been pissing down thanks to Storm Nadine but Spurs winning and them fucktards losing has been a great day4
-
I agreed with the red card.
This one was a yellow:
Consistency.4 -
SELR_addicks said:I agreed with the red card.
This one was a yellow:
Consistency.0 -
fenaddick said:SELR_addicks said:I agreed with the red card.
This one was a yellow:
Consistency.
Also the referee today decided it was a yellow. Clearly refs don't understand the rules even now.0 -
Lol. Theres no crowd. It was a lockdown match.
Anyway, the ball is out wide and theres a bloke in the middle.1 -
Off_it said:Lol. Theres no crowd. It was a lockdown match.
Anyway, the ball is out wide and theres a bloke in the middle.0