Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
January Transfer Window (rumours + actuals)
Comments
-
25
-
We shouldn’t be strengthening a play off contender unless it’s a permanent move we get a decent fee for. Really hope we don’t loan him to BoltonBraziliance said:https://x.com/SportsPeteO/status/1878873850286575709?t=bzQnvdbDDLsjJGnaw2MIjQ&s=19
"Charlton midfielder Terry Taylor is a loan target for Bolton and Dundee in this month’s transfer window. #cafc #bwfc #Dundee"
Pete carrying the summer gossip!26 -
Imo, we should be using him and not sending him off somewhere else where he’ll probably be excellent.NabySarr said:
We shouldn’t be strengthening a play off contender unless it’s a permanent move we get a decent fee for. Really hope we don’t loan him to BoltonBraziliance said:https://x.com/SportsPeteO/status/1878873850286575709?t=bzQnvdbDDLsjJGnaw2MIjQ&s=19
"Charlton midfielder Terry Taylor is a loan target for Bolton and Dundee in this month’s transfer window. #cafc #bwfc #Dundee"
Pete carrying the summer gossip!15 -
.0
-
He'll probably go to Bolton and be excellent. Would rather keep him and send Allan Campbell back to Luton.43
-
Jones doesn’t see them as playing the same position. Taylor can’t get in ahead of Coventry, he’s not competing for a spot in the squad with Allan Campbell.MarcusH26 said:He'll probably go to Bolton and be excellent. Would rather keep him and send Allan Campbell back to Luton.2 -
If he's a loan target for Bolton he's good enough to stay here24
-
Why not? Campbell is a defensive midfielder, four inches shorter in a vertically challenged midfield, and doesn't have the dead ball delivery of TT. Unlike Terry he has not had a single decent game. How the Luton wastrel is ahead of him is bizarre and he's not even our player.Callumcafc said:
Jones doesn’t see them as playing the same position. Taylor can’t get in ahead of Coventry, he’s not competing for a spot in the squad with Allan Campbell.MarcusH26 said:He'll probably go to Bolton and be excellent. Would rather keep him and send Allan Campbell back to Luton.8 -
I honestly can’t see how he doesn’t get into our squad21
-
That's fair enough, I haven't really noticed him before now, and sure he must have good contacts, and uses them. But that FLW thing looks like it is relying entirely on clicks to earn money, and -leaving him personally out of it - it means posting stuff up all the time, and if there isn't enough good stuff, it'll have to be dodgy stuff.ValleyGary said:
No I didn’t. Sounds like agent talk to me.PragueAddick said:
Yeah I know. Just frustrated with the thread I guess.ValleyGary said:
You seem obsessed with this bloke and he ain’t even that bad.PragueAddick said:So here on this thread we are completely devoid of any new rumours about ins and outs at Charlton. And purely by coincidence, so is Mr Pete O'Rourke.
But did you believe we’d be in for Clucas?
However, I still take note of what O’Rourke says, simply because he’s track record with us is pretty good, and he probably kept contacts from his time at Sky.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
I don't think Pete O'Rourke writes articles for FLW? His stories have always been on Twitter/X and Football Insider.PragueAddick said:
That's fair enough, I haven't really noticed him before now, and sure he must have good contacts, and uses them. But that FLW thing looks like it is relying entirely on clicks to earn money, and -leaving him personally out of it - it means posting stuff up all the time, and if there isn't enough good stuff, it'll have to be dodgy stuff.ValleyGary said:
No I didn’t. Sounds like agent talk to me.PragueAddick said:
Yeah I know. Just frustrated with the thread I guess.ValleyGary said:
You seem obsessed with this bloke and he ain’t even that bad.PragueAddick said:So here on this thread we are completely devoid of any new rumours about ins and outs at Charlton. And purely by coincidence, so is Mr Pete O'Rourke.
But did you believe we’d be in for Clucas?
However, I still take note of what O’Rourke says, simply because he’s track record with us is pretty good, and he probably kept contacts from his time at Sky.9 -
The club might have been, why I can't imagine. I've posted this numerous times sorry but even when we were just linked with him I said there was no way he was good enough. Just another waste of money.Chunes said:
If we spent 200k on a 33-year-old striker in Godden, that's worse than any deal for Ahadme. I'm also doubtful we paid that much for Mitchell, he wasn't signing a new contract at Millwall.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Isn't the desperation for Gassan to cost LESS because of how poor he's been? I don't reckon we spent 800k on him, my guess would be closer to 500 upfront. The idea we didn't pay a decent upfront fee is doubtful, in my view. If he'd been good then there wouldn't even be a discussion about him not costing much.
I might be wrong but think I recall when we signed him, there was a post by someone who spends time at the training ground about how excited the club were to get him.
Getting into what % of the transfer budget was shifted into wages is really wading into the woods. Who's to comment either way.0 -
Wasn't Mitchell out of contract ? Why would we pay a fee for himChunes said:
If we spent 200k on a 33-year-old striker in Godden, that's worse than any deal for Ahadme. I'm also doubtful we paid that much for Mitchell, he wasn't signing a new contract at Millwall.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Isn't the desperation for Gassan to cost LESS because of how poor he's been? I don't reckon we spent 800k on him, my guess would be closer to 500 upfront. The idea we didn't pay a decent upfront fee is doubtful, in my view. If he'd been good then there wouldn't even be a discussion about him not costing much.
I might be wrong but think I recall when we signed him, there was a post by someone who spends time at the training ground about how excited the club were to get him.
Getting into what % of the transfer budget was shifted into wages is really wading into the woods. Who's to comment either way.0 -
No he was definitely in contractcharltonbob said:
Wasn't Mitchell out of contract ? Why would we pay a fee for himChunes said:
If we spent 200k on a 33-year-old striker in Godden, that's worse than any deal for Ahadme. I'm also doubtful we paid that much for Mitchell, he wasn't signing a new contract at Millwall.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Isn't the desperation for Gassan to cost LESS because of how poor he's been? I don't reckon we spent 800k on him, my guess would be closer to 500 upfront. The idea we didn't pay a decent upfront fee is doubtful, in my view. If he'd been good then there wouldn't even be a discussion about him not costing much.
I might be wrong but think I recall when we signed him, there was a post by someone who spends time at the training ground about how excited the club were to get him.
Getting into what % of the transfer budget was shifted into wages is really wading into the woods. Who's to comment either way.0 -
We paid an undisclosed fee for Mitchell.charltonbob said:
Wasn't Mitchell out of contract ? Why would we pay a fee for himChunes said:
If we spent 200k on a 33-year-old striker in Godden, that's worse than any deal for Ahadme. I'm also doubtful we paid that much for Mitchell, he wasn't signing a new contract at Millwall.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Isn't the desperation for Gassan to cost LESS because of how poor he's been? I don't reckon we spent 800k on him, my guess would be closer to 500 upfront. The idea we didn't pay a decent upfront fee is doubtful, in my view. If he'd been good then there wouldn't even be a discussion about him not costing much.
I might be wrong but think I recall when we signed him, there was a post by someone who spends time at the training ground about how excited the club were to get him.
Getting into what % of the transfer budget was shifted into wages is really wading into the woods. Who's to comment either way.
https://www.charltonafc.com/news/alex-mitchell-joins-addicks
I think he had 1 more year left on his Millwall contract.4 -
Scoham said:
We paid an undisclosed fee for Mitchell.charltonbob said:
Wasn't Mitchell out of contract ? Why would we pay a fee for himChunes said:
If we spent 200k on a 33-year-old striker in Godden, that's worse than any deal for Ahadme. I'm also doubtful we paid that much for Mitchell, he wasn't signing a new contract at Millwall.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Isn't the desperation for Gassan to cost LESS because of how poor he's been? I don't reckon we spent 800k on him, my guess would be closer to 500 upfront. The idea we didn't pay a decent upfront fee is doubtful, in my view. If he'd been good then there wouldn't even be a discussion about him not costing much.
I might be wrong but think I recall when we signed him, there was a post by someone who spends time at the training ground about how excited the club were to get him.
Getting into what % of the transfer budget was shifted into wages is really wading into the woods. Who's to comment either way.
https://www.charltonafc.com/news/alex-mitchell-joins-addicks
I think he had 1 more year left on his Millwall contract.
Well, it was disclosed to our old mate Ronnie...🤷♂️14 -
However you look at it, outcomes the sameBod said:
Charlie Kirk failed us Charlton didn't fail Charlie Kirk.AberystwythAddick said:
Doubt he’d come to us, think he’s good mates with Charlie Kirk whom I can’t imagine would give us a glowing referenceOh Eddie Youds... said:Someone on ITTV has suggested Owen Dale as a player we should look at.
Always been impressed when I’ve seen him play against us & he fits the bill in terms of being able to play our wide (plus upfront when needed)
Oxford apparently looking to off load him this window:
https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/oxford-united-willing-to-sell-owen-dale-january-transfer-window/1 -
Yep, Shit whichever angle you look at it...🙄AberystwythAddick said:
However you look at it, outcomes the sameBod said:
Charlie Kirk failed us Charlton didn't fail Charlie Kirk.AberystwythAddick said:
Doubt he’d come to us, think he’s good mates with Charlie Kirk whom I can’t imagine would give us a glowing referenceOh Eddie Youds... said:Someone on ITTV has suggested Owen Dale as a player we should look at.
Always been impressed when I’ve seen him play against us & he fits the bill in terms of being able to play our wide (plus upfront when needed)
Oxford apparently looking to off load him this window:
https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/oxford-united-willing-to-sell-owen-dale-january-transfer-window/0 -
Immaterial what Mitchell cost, as he earns his spot every week in my view. I very much doubt it tops what we did or didn't pay for other players.Scoham said:
We paid an undisclosed fee for Mitchell.charltonbob said:
Wasn't Mitchell out of contract ? Why would we pay a fee for himChunes said:
If we spent 200k on a 33-year-old striker in Godden, that's worse than any deal for Ahadme. I'm also doubtful we paid that much for Mitchell, he wasn't signing a new contract at Millwall.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Isn't the desperation for Gassan to cost LESS because of how poor he's been? I don't reckon we spent 800k on him, my guess would be closer to 500 upfront. The idea we didn't pay a decent upfront fee is doubtful, in my view. If he'd been good then there wouldn't even be a discussion about him not costing much.
I might be wrong but think I recall when we signed him, there was a post by someone who spends time at the training ground about how excited the club were to get him.
Getting into what % of the transfer budget was shifted into wages is really wading into the woods. Who's to comment either way.
https://www.charltonafc.com/news/alex-mitchell-joins-addicks
I think he had 1 more year left on his Millwall contract.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Rumour has it he has 92 AI bots doing the work for him.fenaddick said:
Love the idea you have the Pete O'Rourke spends his days on the rumours threads of forums for all 92 EFL & PL clubs so that he can tweet out the stuff he readPragueAddick said:So here on this thread we are completely devoid of any new rumours about ins and outs at Charlton. And purely by coincidence, so is Mr Pete O'Rourke.
4 -
Millwall wanted Mitchell to sign a new contract but he flatly refused because Millwall hadn’t even bothered to check on him whilst at Lincoln. They went back to offer again and he said “as I said before I will not be signing a new contract. I want to leave”
I think his contract was up for renewal last summer so, if we have paid something, it was compensation as opposed to a transfer fee11 -
Hmm, that hasn't been mentioned on CL has it?Braziliance said:https://x.com/SportsPeteO/status/1878873850286575709?t=bzQnvdbDDLsjJGnaw2MIjQ&s=19
"Charlton midfielder Terry Taylor is a loan target for Bolton and Dundee in this month’s transfer window. #cafc #bwfc #Dundee"
Pete carrying the January* gossip!0 -
For a player out of contract ?RonnieMoore said:
Ahadme was at least 600,000 first instalment as 50% of a deal has to be paid the other 50% over the next two years .. Godden was 450,000 , Mitchell was 350,000 that come from MillwallSouthLincsAddick said:
Yeah but Ahadme is absolute crap, Godden is meh. It’s like the Sandgaard era never ended.CL_Phantom said:Chunes said:
Yeah it was but not sure the maths adds up there. Otherwise there should be a lot of the May money still sat in the bank.MartinCAFC said:
Pretty sure it's been put on a thread recently that we didn't pay the bulk of the Ahadme fee up front it was around £325k or so with the rest in add-ons and a promotion bonus? though stand to be corrected.Weegie Addick said:And the bulk of that £1.2M (though hopefully not quite all of it) went on signing and paying Ahadme.It was clearly stated at start of season that the minimum aim was play offs so I don’t think “top ten” is much of an improvement.Fans showed a lot of commitment in buying STs this season. Going to be a lot needed to convince most to renew. A good window and positive second half of season will be vital to that - especially if we’re facing yet another (sixth in a row?) season in L1.
Doesnt it?
We brought in 5 players on transfer fees in the summer, lets be generous with some of those figures:
Ahadme 300K
Godden 200K
Mitchell 200k
Edwards 85K (a reported figure from Scotland)
Dixon 50K
Thats 835K before adding in Docherty and Mannion's signing on fees as well as any potential loan fee for Campbell.*
And seeing as theres a desperation for Ahadme to have actually cost us 800K up front then theres even less left, like, none.
And if Godden and Mitchell cost us 100K each then at most theres 500K left from the May money, but thats being generous and not including wages.
* And of course the unforgettable Potts and Hylton (I believe an itk was on here saying the delay around Potts coming in was because he had some high wage expectations)
Even methven isn't that dim 1 -
Crowley signing for MK0
-
https://x.com/sportspeteo/status/1878902999277580645?s=46&t=MojDVxh_AjG5taAWPQn6TwI-SAW-POUSO-PLAY said:Crowley signing for MK
0 -
12
-
I expect Harry Cornick will join a L1 team on loan, although at 29 Bristol might want to move him on as a perm.
My Bristol City mate says he's a good player and would be a great signing for us.
He normally get's it right with Bristol City and Chelsea players.
1 -
Uhhh I said exactly why in my post. It’s not my opinion, it’s the manager’s.Gisappointed said:
Why not? Campbell is a defensive midfielder, four inches shorter in a vertically challenged midfield, and doesn't have the dead ball delivery of TT. Unlike Terry he has not had a single decent game. How the Luton wastrel is ahead of him is bizarre and he's not even our player.Callumcafc said:
Jones doesn’t see them as playing the same position. Taylor can’t get in ahead of Coventry, he’s not competing for a spot in the squad with Allan Campbell.MarcusH26 said:He'll probably go to Bolton and be excellent. Would rather keep him and send Allan Campbell back to Luton.1 -
Crowley to MK Dons is scandalous
Get in there Nathan!0
