Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Scott Parker

1234568»

Comments

  • Claus Jenson for me ... Paul Walsh as academy product
  • BalladMan said:
    JaShea99 said:
    But if he’s motivated by money as you suggest, then surely he does regret the move because he could have made so much more money had he moved to the right club at the right time.
    Not trying to protect Parker here (I was devastated when he left mid season) but we have no idea what he was promised by Chelsea.  Maybe they convinced him he was going to be the main man and therefore were ‘the right club’.
    Yeah…what’s that got to do with whether he regrets it or not though?
  • JaShea99 said:
    But if he’s motivated by money as you suggest, then surely he does regret the move because he could have made so much more money had he moved to the right club at the right time.
    He did alright ultimately.
    I’d argue he didn’t but it’s all relative.
  • BalladMan said:
    JaShea99 said:
    But if he’s motivated by money as you suggest, then surely he does regret the move because he could have made so much more money had he moved to the right club at the right time.
    Not trying to protect Parker here (I was devastated when he left mid season) but we have no idea what he was promised by Chelsea.  Maybe they convinced him he was going to be the main man and therefore were ‘the right club’.
    I always felt Chelsea's buying strategy at that time was more to do with stealing the best players from their competitors than having a clear strategy for building their own team. For a year or so we came up on their radar and we paid the price. Quite possibly, so did Parker.
  • Stig said:
    BalladMan said:
    JaShea99 said:
    But if he’s motivated by money as you suggest, then surely he does regret the move because he could have made so much more money had he moved to the right club at the right time.
    Not trying to protect Parker here (I was devastated when he left mid season) but we have no idea what he was promised by Chelsea.  Maybe they convinced him he was going to be the main man and therefore were ‘the right club’.
    I always felt Chelsea's buying strategy at that time was more to do with stealing the best players from their competitors than having a clear strategy for building their own team. For a year or so we came up on their radar and we paid the price. Quite possibly, so did Parker.
    And remains their strategy. Stockpiling. 
  • Still the best Charlton player I have seen in my 60 years of supporting them 
    Steve Thompson would like a word... 
  • I’m not as old as some of you but surely Allan Simonsen is the best in the last 60 years
  • NelsonsFU said:
    Claus Jenson for me ... Paul Walsh as academy product
    On the button.
  • Loved watching Simonsen far too good for the rest team but didn’t play enough games for me to consider him DiCanio is a good shout but will stick with Parker
  • Sponsored links:


  • Should have stayed for the season and then gone to Man Utd to replace Keane who left that season.
  • Should have stayed for the season and then gone to Man Utd to replace Keane who left that season.

    Can think of 3 English players who would have had a much better career if they worked under SAF.

    Gascoigne, Shearer, and Parker.

    Ferguson would have loved Scott, but I don't think he would have been one of the 1st names on the team sheet. Darren fletcher was an underrated replacement for Keane and there would have been tough competition to get in the starting line up, however much he would have improved. 

    I'd have felt proud to see parker in a united shirt and getting his name on trophies but it wasn't to be.

    Parker would probably be one of few players to not have some Scottish bloke going absolutely nuts at him after every game.



  • NelsonsFU said:
    Claus Jenson for me ... Paul Walsh as academy product
    On the button.
    Jensen and Parker together were sensational .  


Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!