Another one here who is missing the game. Think we will be defensively tight enough to keep them out but can we nick one at the other end? Uncomfortable 1-0 win, Kelman in the 81st minute and a hero is born.
Grand daughter ( season ticket holder) off to Uni in York tomorrow....
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Don’t want to give anyone any confidence but Millwall are missing 5 regular starters and also sold Tanganga on deadline day and to top it off their deadline day signings aren’t match fit yet statistically there is no better time to play them this season
It’s actually 7 regular starters if you include the ones who got injured at the end of last season.
You could lose your entire first team squad to the Ebola virus and we'd still find a way to lose to you.
Don’t want to give anyone any confidence but Millwall are missing 5 regular starters and also sold Tanganga on deadline day and to top it off their deadline day signings aren’t match fit yet statistically there is no better time to play them this season
It’s actually 7 regular starters if you include the ones who got injured at the end of last season.
You could lose your entire first team squad to the Ebola virus and we'd still find a way to lose to you.
With African international Ebola Virus scoring the winner !
Living on the Hampshire coast, all I can hear is the bloody Saints V Pompey Sunday match, getting absolutely pissed off with the stuff… So COYR, let’s show ‘em what a real derby is like tomorrow 👏👏
Only one result. They are winning away & can't see anything but them recording 3 in 3 away wins this season.
However, IF we are going to get anything from the game then we need to rest the players just back from International duty & play those that have presumably been working on stuff all week. So drop TC & play Tanto against his old team.
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The “we’ve had the longest time without defeat” line is the best case of that. Yes, 35 years, but just 6 games 😆
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The “we’ve had the longest time without defeat” line is the best case of that. Yes, 35 years, but just 6 games 😆
There are two ways to look at it. Our unbeaten run was six games - yours WAS 12, so you win. In terms of time, your unbeaten run was 29 years, our unbeaten run was 35 years - we win.
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The “we’ve had the longest time without defeat” line is the best case of that. Yes, 35 years, but just 6 games 😆
There are two ways to look at it. Our unbeaten run was six games - yours WAS 12, so you win. In terms of time, your unbeaten run was 29 years, our unbeaten run was 35 years - we win.
Dishonourable draw I would say
What about all our other unbeaten runs? 😆
Also, if you work it out to the same game/time ratio, our current unbeaten run would span 70 years 😁
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The “we’ve had the longest time without defeat” line is the best case of that. Yes, 35 years, but just 6 games 😆
There are two ways to look at it. Our unbeaten run was six games - yours WAS 12, so you win. In terms of time, your unbeaten run was 29 years, our unbeaten run was 35 years - we win.
Dishonourable draw I would say
I know you’re having a laugh here, but I actually think there’s one or two posters on here who think it’s a credible argument. Not mentioning any names 😉
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The “we’ve had the longest time without defeat” line is the best case of that. Yes, 35 years, but just 6 games 😆
There are two ways to look at it. Our unbeaten run was six games - yours WAS 12, so you win. In terms of time, your unbeaten run was 29 years, our unbeaten run was 35 years - we win.
Dishonourable draw I would say
I know you’re having a laugh here, but I actually think there’s one or two posters on here who think it’s a credible argument. Not mentioning any names 😉
Unbeaten in 35 years is a fact - and the only one we can cling to!
You definitely have the hex on us, that's for sure - but it will make us winning tomorrow so much sweeter
From the historic record it's important we consider only the relevant statistics.
Tomorrow we play each other for the first time in over 5 years. When there's been a gap of 4 or more years between fixtures, we're unbeaten in the next one played.
(okay, so the outcome has always been a draw, on four occasions, but still...)
Has anybody heard a mention of this game on TalkSPORT this week ? It seems like every time they start mentioning this weekends games they rattle off just about every match except this one.
Has anybody heard a mention of this game on TalkSPORT this week ? It seems like every time they start mentioning this weekends games they rattle off just about every match except this one.
Has anybody heard a mention of this game on TalkSPORT this week ? It seems like every time they start mentioning this weekends games they rattle off just about every match except this one.
A game even more massive than normal. Both teams coming off of a defeat and need to respond. No idea why I just feel NJ suits these occasions and will have the squad really up for it. Im confident that we wont do our usual and just roll over to this lot. Im going for a 2-1 victory as long as NJ stokes them up but not too much otherwise we could see a sending off somewhere.
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
Looking at that, the amount of unbeaten runs we’ve had against you. 14 games in the 1920’s, 5 games in the 1930’s (which were all wins), 8 games in the 60’s and 70’s, 12 games from 1979 to 1990, 7 games in the 90’s, and obviously the current one. It’s just mad when you think about it.
It’s not even like we’ve been the dominant and bigger club. Maybe in the early days and in very recent history, but not in between.
Now that you mention it, if we take these streaky blips out of the equation, our record is very strong.
are you a professional politician ? .. that retort is a classic case of finding a (non existent) positive from a negative situation
The “we’ve had the longest time without defeat” line is the best case of that. Yes, 35 years, but just 6 games 😆
There are two ways to look at it. Our unbeaten run was six games - yours WAS 12, so you win. In terms of time, your unbeaten run was 29 years, our unbeaten run was 35 years - we win.
Dishonourable draw I would say
What about all our other unbeaten runs? 😆
Also, if you work it out to the same game/time ratio, our current unbeaten run would span 70 years 😁
Sounds like we have got 'em rattled. def signs of panic surfacing...
Comments
As atrocious as this record is...
The expanded Covered End is yet to witness a win - that's a stat which can be put right.
I'm upgrading my prediction, going for 2-0 and absolute scenes in the Covered End.
I am more surprised that it has gone to two pages, I thought they still use crayons over there.
So COYR, let’s show ‘em what a real derby is like tomorrow 👏👏
…2-0
Tomorrow we play each other for the first time in over 5 years. When there's been a gap of 4 or more years between fixtures, we're unbeaten in the next one played.
(okay, so the outcome has always been a draw, on four occasions, but still...)
Sounds like we have got 'em rattled. def signs of panic surfacing...