Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Reebok it is then (new 3rd shirt p51)
Comments
-
1
-
Looks like one Panama rejected.sammy391 said:
The new warm-up tops look pukka!0 -
It is nice to see that the range has been extended with the clothing.
1 -
it's a traiing shirt - couldn't give less of a shit how it looks10
-
Hopefully the site is well set up for when the new kit launches.... could be a bit of a Q for it.1
-
Oh no, hope we’re not getting their big blue logo as wellDamoNorthStand said:Hopefully the site is well set up for when the new kit launches.... could be a bit of a Q for it.0 -
Oh no, not a fucking betting company on the shirt6
-
Incredible lack of ambition if true0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Would be so so disappointed if we've gone with a betting sponsor.5
-
The Red Robin said:Not exactly a scoop but RSK definitely the main shirt sponsor for men and women next year. May be more to come from them too.
5 -
Good!2
-
Lol people are so quick to moan about something that's not even true, based on an innocuous single comment on a forum
How bizarre12 -
I really like all the green travelling clobber.4
-
I like some of the designs. Won't buy any of it though as all sports kit is a rip off imo £40 for some shorts, £38 for a training top3
-
£38 is definitely punchy for a training top, especially when the kids version is £35 (also not cheap). Will probably end up getting the blue version though if im not keen on the actual shirts.0
-

Is this a hint to away kit colour?3 -
Sponsored links:
-
I have no idea what RSK sell.
Never have.
However it is fun to speculate.
An ‘i’ and a ’y’ would make speculation risky.
As those letters are in the club shop, they might mean ‘remove sneaky kleptomaniacs’.0 -
They are an environmental consultancy / sustainability solutions business. I have always said front of shirt is the wrong asset for them…. They are B2B. They should be stadium partners and then build a big activation around the carbon footprint of the valley.jose said:I have no idea what RSK sell.
Never have.
However it is fun to speculate.
An ‘i’ and a ’y’ would make speculation risky.
As those letters are in the club shop, they might mean ‘remove sneaky kleptomaniacs’.
Front of shirt doesn’t make any sense4 -
Or "Remove Seph...'kinell"jose said:I have no idea what RSK sell.
Never have.
However it is fun to speculate.
An ‘i’ and a ’y’ would make speculation risky.
As those letters are in the club shop, they might mean ‘remove sneaky kleptomaniacs’.0 -
sam3110 said:Lol people are so quick to moan about something that's not even true, based on an innocuous single comment on a forum
How bizarre
I don't think it's bizarre. It wouldn't be much of a forum if people didn't respond to comments. Gambling is an emotive issue for some people, and the person making the comment has (or has previously had) some insight into kits and sponsorship that most of us don't. If he was just having a bit of fun with the comment, then fair enough, but I don't think it's at all strange that people reacted.5 -
It’ll be RSK on the front of men and women’s shirts next year. Source: RSK.Rothko said:Oh no, not a fucking betting company on the shirtThis was presented to staff at an exec meeting last week by Alan Ryder, who is the ‘R’ in RSK and a Charlton fan.7 -
Well, I’m glad I got the wrong end of the stick last night, can’t stand betting companies on shirts, and worse ours.8
-
I do like these Panama Reebok kits3
-
That clears that up then .DamoNorthStand said:
They are an environmental consultancy / sustainability solutions business. I have always said front of shirt is the wrong asset for them…. They are B2B. They should be stadium partners and then build a big activation around the carbon footprint of the valley.jose said:I have no idea what RSK sell.
Never have.
However it is fun to speculate.
An ‘i’ and a ’y’ would make speculation risky.
As those letters are in the club shop, they might mean ‘remove sneaky kleptomaniacs’.
Front of shirt doesn’t make any senseI still have no idea what they do.2















