Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer Window 2026 - Rumours and Discussion

1225226228230231242

Comments

  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 86,585
    Personally I'd rather be relegated than have abetting leech logo on our shirt. 
    Possibly the worse take on anything I've ever read

    You need to read his/her post on the Ken Bates thread mate.
    Think it must have been deleted
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 30,368
    edited July 11
    Personally I'd rather be relegated than have abetting leech logo on our shirt. 
    Possibly the worse take on anything I've ever read

    You need to read his/her post on the Ken Bates thread mate.
    Think it must have been deleted
    I have seen it has been.

    Well done on the mods for acting immediately.
  • 2121
    2121 Posts: 1,615
    Rothko said:
    And betting sponsors means kids can’t get the same shirts as the players, and that’s never liked 
    What do they put pm the kids shirts? 
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 19,371
    2121 said:
    Rothko said:
    And betting sponsors means kids can’t get the same shirts as the players, and that’s never liked 
    What do they put pm the kids shirts? 
    Either blank or some secondary sponsor gets on the front 
  • jose
    jose Posts: 1,551
    On the kids shirts you put:
     ‘please gamble responsibly, when the fun stops STOP!’
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 23,721
    Usually it's something like the club foundation or community trust.

    Wet Spam put the Bobby Moore Foundation on theirs before. 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 86,585
    Could put the museum logo on the kids shirts
  • Interesting one aha
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 72,554
    edited July 11
    2121 said:
    Rothko said:
    And betting sponsors means kids can’t get the same shirts as the players, and that’s never liked 
    What do they put pm the kids shirts? 
    A vaping company

  • Sponsored links:



  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,816
    edited July 11
    Wrong
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,816
    edited July 11
    Thread
  • Any rumours ?
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 20,223
    Any rumours ?
    Yeah, apparently Jude Bellingham is a good footballer 
  • Bod
    Bod Posts: 298
    redbuttle said:
    redbuttle said:
    It's great seeing all the positivity on here.
    Give us something to be positive about. 
    That we are still in the championship and have quite a while to sign players before the season starts. Also. the majority of our fans are actually behind the team and the manager.  You only have to go to games to see that.
    Well said👏
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 34,024
    Any rumours ?
    Apparently FIFA are corrupt because VAR got a couple of decisions right tonight.
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,856
    Any rumours ?
    Apparently FIFA are corrupt because VAR got a couple of decisions right tonight.

    FIFA are corrupt and thats nothing to do with any decisions tonight.
  • Crispy
    Crispy Posts: 616
    cabbles said:
    Hopefully things will pick up this week and we might see some movement now Slovenia’s done 
    Don’t hold your breath.
    Sure you’re not Reams in disguise? 
  • Steven81
    Steven81 Posts: 1,476
    edited July 12
    Crispy said:
    cabbles said:
    Hopefully things will pick up this week and we might see some movement now Slovenia’s done 
    Don’t hold your breath.
    Sure you’re not Reams in disguise? 
    That forum makes me laugh constantly digging this place out with hardly any provocation, lots of back slapping and nob gobbling to the high chief  with the adage that it's the best Charlton forum when it gets about 10 posts a day and they can't even finish the England match thread stuck at 1-1 🤣 ...... Fannies : )
  • DennisBooth
    DennisBooth Posts: 234
    Steven81 said:
    Crispy said:
    cabbles said:
    Hopefully things will pick up this week and we might see some movement now Slovenia’s done 
    Don’t hold your breath.
    Sure you’re not Reams in disguise? 
    That forum makes me laugh constantly digging this place out with hardly any provocation, lots of back slapping and nob gobbling to the high chief  with the adage that it's the best Charlton forum when it gets about 10 posts a day and they can't even finish the England match thread stuck at 1-1 🤣 ...... Fannies : )
    I thought you weren’t allowed to mention that forum on here? I am not Reams.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 52,300
    Steven81 said:
    Crispy said:
    cabbles said:
    Hopefully things will pick up this week and we might see some movement now Slovenia’s done 
    Don’t hold your breath.
    Sure you’re not Reams in disguise? 
    That forum makes me laugh constantly digging this place out with hardly any provocation, lots of back slapping and nob gobbling to the high chief  with the adage that it's the best Charlton forum when it gets about 10 posts a day and they can't even finish the England match thread stuck at 1-1 🤣 ...... Fannies : )
    I thought you weren’t allowed to mention that forum on here? I am not Reams.
    I am Spartacus! 
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,674
    My thing with betting sponsorship is a mixed one 

    Part of me, probably the bigger part of me says "let people have agency of their own lives, be adults and make their own decisions" if someone is so weak of mind they start drinking Stella or smoking embassy because it is on a football shirt then I don't hold much hope for them full stop 

    The rest is probably more in line with the consenus and based more on a dislike of hypocrisy than anything else 

    Gambling, online gambling is scuzzy. With valid reason booze and cigarettes aren't allowed to be advertised on shirts due to the harm they can cause so the use of them shouldn't be promoted. Yet the damage caused by gambling addiction is at least as bad for people and lives. 

    Ultimately, I can only speak for myself. If us being sponsored by some hawkish online betting firm means we can sign a good midfielder then I don't really care 
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,479
    Good to see @DamoNorthStand and @Henry Irving draw out the commercial side in a few posts earlier. It’s hugely important, given the new rules, in determining what we can spend.  I’d heard a few weeks ago, and intimated it on the new shirt thread, that RSK were not going to be the new sponsor and a betting company was lined up. For whatever reason, we ended up going back to RSK with our tails between our legs and they ended up with a better deal (for them) than before.  We are currently very much in the shadow of even our near neighbours and pretty much all of the division. 

    Commercial deals at Charlton aren’t going to fall into our laps. A lot of work needs to be done and that’s not evident at the moment. 

    I’d also say that, in an ideal world, I wouldn’t want a betting company involved but I don’t agree that it shows no ambition by signing a deal (given their ban in the Prem). If we were successful, that’s a win for us AND the sponsor. They take their brand to the next hopeful and we get the opportunity to benefit from the exposure the Prem brings and the levels of sponsorship that offers.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 20,223
    Carter said:
    My thing with betting sponsorship is a mixed one 

    Part of me, probably the bigger part of me says "let people have agency of their own lives, be adults and make their own decisions" if someone is so weak of mind they start drinking Stella or smoking embassy because it is on a football shirt then I don't hold much hope for them full stop 

    The rest is probably more in line with the consenus and based more on a dislike of hypocrisy than anything else 

    Gambling, online gambling is scuzzy. With valid reason booze and cigarettes aren't allowed to be advertised on shirts due to the harm they can cause so the use of them shouldn't be promoted. Yet the damage caused by gambling addiction is at least as bad for people and lives. 

    Ultimately, I can only speak for myself. If us being sponsored by some hawkish online betting firm means we can sign a good midfielder then I don't really care 
    But going by Damo’s numbers I don’t think it does mean that. Good midfielders are costing £2/3m and he said that front of shirt sponsorships are hitting £1m. Now we aren’t starting at a base of £0 so we’re not talking budget changing money here 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 86,585
    Thanks @TelMc32

    These things happen and usually no one outside the club hears about it.

    This time it has leaked which is a surprise given how little transfer news seeps out these days.

    It does beg a few questions, none of which I expect to get an answer to here, about why the betting co. deal collapsed, who authorised it, does the departure of Ed Warrick and the arrival of Terry Brown connect to this and would things have been different if we had a CEO in place?

    Anyway, back to transfer rumours.
  • gringo
    gringo Posts: 1,215
    Steven81 said:
    Crispy said:
    cabbles said:
    Hopefully things will pick up this week and we might see some movement now Slovenia’s done 
    Don’t hold your breath.
    Sure you’re not Reams in disguise? 
    That forum makes me laugh constantly digging this place out with hardly any provocation, lots of back slapping and nob gobbling to the high chief  with the adage that it's the best Charlton forum when it gets about 10 posts a day and they can't even finish the England match thread stuck at 1-1 🤣 ...... Fannies : )
    I thought you weren’t allowed to mention that forum on here? I am not Reams.
    Theres another forum?! :o
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 23,721
    My guess is it didn't fall apart but instead was nixed due to the huge negative reaction it would have garnered. People hated the Betdaq sponsor and threatened to boycott the entire season over it, and their logo was incredibly nondescript compared to most casino/betting site logos nowadays 
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 51,284
    Carter said:
    My thing with betting sponsorship is a mixed one 

    Part of me, probably the bigger part of me says "let people have agency of their own lives, be adults and make their own decisions" if someone is so weak of mind they start drinking Stella or smoking embassy because it is on a football shirt then I don't hold much hope for them full stop 

    The rest is probably more in line with the consenus and based more on a dislike of hypocrisy than anything else 

    Gambling, online gambling is scuzzy. With valid reason booze and cigarettes aren't allowed to be advertised on shirts due to the harm they can cause so the use of them shouldn't be promoted. Yet the damage caused by gambling addiction is at least as bad for people and lives. 

    Ultimately, I can only speak for myself. If us being sponsored by some hawkish online betting firm means we can sign a good midfielder then I don't really care 
    Unequivocally betting damages and in some cases wrecks people’s lives. That’s not even up for discussion. I understand the argument that people should take responsibility for their own lives but in reality it’s not always realistic. Betting isn’t illegal but as you say online stuff is pretty scuzzy. I don’t think it’s moral to support or encourage it. If we can’t sign that midfielder then so be it.
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 1,683
    edited July 12


    Were we not interested in this guy not too long ago? 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 5,811


    Were we not interested in this guy not too long ago? 
    Yes, last summer we were linked with him