Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer Window 2026 - Rumours and Discussion

1250251253255256551

Comments

  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 36,413
    sam3110 said:
    Pepe at Arsenal
    Di Maria at Man United
    Phillips at Man City

    All clubs have stinkers 
    I would expect those players got a move to another top club. Not ones one or even two divisions below them.

    Poster said that League 1 & 2 clubs are baulking at taking Apter & Tanto.  That is the difference. All clubs sign players that don't work out - our problem is we paid top dollar (for us) and now cant move them on.  
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 10,554
    No Apter in the squad today.... 
  • 2121
    2121 Posts: 1,699
    Christ, the ladies team seem to sign someone every half hour! 
  • PeterGage
    PeterGage Posts: 1,827
    cafcfan said:
    clive said:
    My 18 year old grandson has just had his hair cut in New Eltham and also there was a as yet unannounced new signing also getting his hair cut! He didn’t ask his name but he told the barber that he had just signed. I know that several of the players use this barber so let’s wait and see who it is. My grandson said it wasn’t Karlan Grant
    A fringe player, maybe.
    Maybe a Mohican?  Our first Native American. 
    A common and very annoying mistake. The Mohawk warriors traditionally plucked out (not shaved or cut) all their hair apart from a small 3" square on the crown which was braided and decorated.
    The style of hair falsely attributed to them is actually a Pawnee Nation one.


    I don’t think The Last of the Pawnees has quite the same ring to it. 
    Mohican and Mohawk are completely different tribes 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 21,112
    2121 said:
    Christ, the ladies team seem to sign someone every half hour! 
    The women’s team only had about 9 players 3 days ago so lots of work needed (and most of it has been renewals
  • I have it from a reliable source in Eltham, that there will be two midfielders on Trial today…

    Jimmy Crewcut (he’s short and a very creative midfielder, he’s able to pick a pass out that cuts through the oppositions back line and really exposes their defence)

    and

    Christopher Combover (he’s a very physical and pacey central midfielder who has a tendency to drift out wide, however provides perfect extra cover for wing backs to push forward) 


  • StrikerFirmani
    StrikerFirmani Posts: 2,825
    Not sure signing Grant is a good move  my concern, likely be this seasons Burke signing.

    Beggars can’t be choosers!

    They can actually.  Choose not to waste the wages for someone likely to not play.
  • SheedyCAFC
    SheedyCAFC Posts: 1,350
    2121 said:
    Christ, the ladies team seem to sign someone every half hour! 
    Think that person signing for Charlton was in a salon & not a barbers!
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 2,018
    NabySarr said:
    NabySarr said:
    1 in 1 out might make this a very very slow window. I wonder if the owners will tell NJ he has to stick with Apter and Olafe as he only bought them last season. 

    I’d be furious if it was my money that had been wasted like that. 
    If they expected every expensive signing to go well then they were very naive in the first place. One look at pretty much every teams transfer business each season would tell them that this isn’t uncommon 
    But in this case it was every expensive signing, going poorly. 

    You can’t say that you would be happy with the situation if it was your money. 

    Olaofe was what £1.5m? Apter rumoured at £2m+. That’s really not much in the grand scheme of things and the money the owners have put into the club over the past few years 

    Look at any championship club and they’ll have signed players for more that have flopped. I’m sure we will have more flops in future years if we stay at this level. I know we aren’t used to spending money so it maybe feels worse to us, but this is normal and if the owners have a huge problem with it then they probably shouldn’t own a championship football club 
    Other clubs are irrelevant in this situation. So are hypotheticals on what we could spend. 

    It is what we have spent and they are two of our most expensive signings of the last 10 years. Certainly the two most expensive of the owners tenure. The money was paid because they were told that these were the players we needed to progress. 6 months later those players are back in league one, 12 months later we are seemingly trying to either sell them or loan them out again. 

    That’s is unacceptable, there’s no spin you can put on it that changes that. 

    We have one of the lowest budgets in the league those fees were huge for us. 
      I don’t think people can grasp how difficult it was to recruit for such a competitive league with the 3rd worst budget (or they don’t want to understand), especially when we had to overhaul most of the L1 squad. We would’ve been at the back of the queue for all signings, not being able to offer wages remotely close to the rest of the league. Our only choice would’ve been high risk signings, L1 players who maybe could make the step up and experienced championship players with dodgy injury records. Had we been relegated then there might been some merit to the criticism, but we were never in a relegation scrap and were ultimately successful. There was a high wastage in the recruitment but I believe that would have been part of the plan. What do you want, a no risk recruitment policy and a return to L1, I don’t?

    Perhaps what you find ‘unacceptable’ is the financial disadvantage we are under, in which case you should direct your frustration at the owners. Personally, I think they’ve been outstanding, to me they building a sustainable future for the club. We have come a long way since they arrived.
    Why would I find the owners spending unacceptable. 

    They were told that these players would be the ones to progress us, they paid the money required and were subsequently sold a pup. 

    I find it very funny that some of you think the owners wouldn’t be annoyed or angry with this. Us placing a significant portion of our transfer funds on two players who are now being shipped out after less than 30 appearances Between the two is absolutely mental and should be criticised. 
    Or perhaps when promotion was achieved, the owners and Jones sat down and assessed given the overhaul needed and the time and money available to get the players in, that there would need to be some calculated gambles which were better than 50/50 but would provide a squad needed. Not everything needs to be viewed as abject failure which it seems to me you always turn to as a first option. Certainly Olaofe and Apter have thus far beeen fails but perhaps that’s built in rather than your perception.
    Spending what we spent on those two to have them loaned back to league one within half a season is a failure. 
    With posters saying that we are now trying to sell the two of them after less than half a season with us is a failure. 


  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 51,480
    NabySarr said:
    NabySarr said:
    1 in 1 out might make this a very very slow window. I wonder if the owners will tell NJ he has to stick with Apter and Olafe as he only bought them last season. 

    I’d be furious if it was my money that had been wasted like that. 
    If they expected every expensive signing to go well then they were very naive in the first place. One look at pretty much every teams transfer business each season would tell them that this isn’t uncommon 
    But in this case it was every expensive signing, going poorly. 

    You can’t say that you would be happy with the situation if it was your money. 

    Olaofe was what £1.5m? Apter rumoured at £2m+. That’s really not much in the grand scheme of things and the money the owners have put into the club over the past few years 

    Look at any championship club and they’ll have signed players for more that have flopped. I’m sure we will have more flops in future years if we stay at this level. I know we aren’t used to spending money so it maybe feels worse to us, but this is normal and if the owners have a huge problem with it then they probably shouldn’t own a championship football club 
    Other clubs are irrelevant in this situation. So are hypotheticals on what we could spend. 

    It is what we have spent and they are two of our most expensive signings of the last 10 years. Certainly the two most expensive of the owners tenure. The money was paid because they were told that these were the players we needed to progress. 6 months later those players are back in league one, 12 months later we are seemingly trying to either sell them or loan them out again. 

    That’s is unacceptable, there’s no spin you can put on it that changes that. 

    We have one of the lowest budgets in the league those fees were huge for us. 
      I don’t think people can grasp how difficult it was to recruit for such a competitive league with the 3rd worst budget (or they don’t want to understand), especially when we had to overhaul most of the L1 squad. We would’ve been at the back of the queue for all signings, not being able to offer wages remotely close to the rest of the league. Our only choice would’ve been high risk signings, L1 players who maybe could make the step up and experienced championship players with dodgy injury records. Had we been relegated then there might been some merit to the criticism, but we were never in a relegation scrap and were ultimately successful. There was a high wastage in the recruitment but I believe that would have been part of the plan. What do you want, a no risk recruitment policy and a return to L1, I don’t?

    Perhaps what you find ‘unacceptable’ is the financial disadvantage we are under, in which case you should direct your frustration at the owners. Personally, I think they’ve been outstanding, to me they building a sustainable future for the club. We have come a long way since they arrived.
    Why would I find the owners spending unacceptable. 

    They were told that these players would be the ones to progress us, they paid the money required and were subsequently sold a pup. 

    I find it very funny that some of you think the owners wouldn’t be annoyed or angry with this. Us placing a significant portion of our transfer funds on two players who are now being shipped out after less than 30 appearances Between the two is absolutely mental and should be criticised. 
    Or perhaps when promotion was achieved, the owners and Jones sat down and assessed given the overhaul needed and the time and money available to get the players in, that there would need to be some calculated gambles which were better than 50/50 but would provide a squad needed. Not everything needs to be viewed as abject failure which it seems to me you always turn to as a first option. Certainly Olaofe and Apter have thus far beeen fails but perhaps that’s built in rather than your perception.
    Spending what we spent on those two to have them loaned back to league one within half a season is a failure. 
    With posters saying that we are now trying to sell the two of them after less than half a season with us is a failure. 


    Did you actually read what I said ?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 66,971
    edited July 18
    I have it from a reliable source in Eltham, that there will be two midfielders on Trial today…

    Jimmy Crewcut (he’s short and a very creative midfielder, he’s able to pick a pass out that cuts through the oppositions back line and really exposes their defence)

    and

    Christopher Combover (he’s a very physical and pacey central midfielder who has a tendency to drift out wide, however provides perfect extra cover for wing backs to push forward) 


    Do they know Bob Mortimer’s mates Gary Cheeseman (sniper’s dream), Ronnie Omelettes and Mickey The Drink?
  • superdulvertonred
    superdulvertonred Posts: 1,284
    Just spoken to my grandson again and showed him some photos of Karlan Grant and now saying it could be him but with a much fuller beard than he has in pictures on the internet 
     Nothing more concrete I am afraid 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 2,565
    Considering Gough mwamba and Enslin have made the bench today can we assume Apter Mitchell and Karoy may be off. 

    Blackpool already in for Karoy, assume Tolaj sale means Plymouth can now afford Mitchell, Apter remains to be seen. 

    Even Mannion not making the bench could be a sign Plymouth are desperate for a keeper as well
  • Steven81
    Steven81 Posts: 1,506
    I have it from a reliable source in Eltham, that there will be two midfielders on Trial today…

    Jimmy Crewcut (he’s short and a very creative midfielder, he’s able to pick a pass out that cuts through the oppositions back line and really exposes their defence)

    and

    Christopher Combover (he’s a very physical and pacey central midfielder who has a tendency to drift out wide, however provides perfect extra cover for wing backs to push forward) 


    Do they know Bob Mortimer’s mates Gary Cheeseman (sniper’s dream), Ronnie Omelettes and Mickey The Drink?
    Broccoli highkicks aswell 🤣
  • DDOUBLEE
    DDOUBLEE Posts: 2,305
    Steven81 said:
    I have it from a reliable source in Eltham, that there will be two midfielders on Trial today…

    Jimmy Crewcut (he’s short and a very creative midfielder, he’s able to pick a pass out that cuts through the oppositions back line and really exposes their defence)

    and

    Christopher Combover (he’s a very physical and pacey central midfielder who has a tendency to drift out wide, however provides perfect extra cover for wing backs to push forward) 


    Do they know Bob Mortimer’s mates Gary Cheeseman (sniper’s dream), Ronnie Omelettes and Mickey The Drink?
    Broccoli highkicks aswell 🤣
    Saw Sergeant Bytheway bringing his son Steve to the Middlesbrough v Charlton game last season....
  • Belv
    Belv Posts: 872
    Just spoken to my grandson again and showed him some photos of Karlan Grant and now saying it could be him but with a much fuller beard than he has in pictures on the internet 
     Nothing more concrete I am afraid 
    Redmond then. 
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 34,207
    Considering Gough mwamba and Enslin have made the bench today can we assume Apter Mitchell and Karoy may be off. 

    Blackpool already in for Karoy, assume Tolaj sale means Plymouth can now afford Mitchell, Apter remains to be seen. 

    Even Mannion not making the bench could be a sign Plymouth are desperate for a keeper as well
    Equally could mean they are all carrying knocks 🤕
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 2,565
    Considering Gough mwamba and Enslin have made the bench today can we assume Apter Mitchell and Karoy may be off. 

    Blackpool already in for Karoy, assume Tolaj sale means Plymouth can now afford Mitchell, Apter remains to be seen. 

    Even Mannion not making the bench could be a sign Plymouth are desperate for a keeper as well
    Equally could mean they are all carrying knocks 🤕
    Despite all of them being involved in Slovenia surely you don’t pick up 4 injuries during training 
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,582
    Photo taken from behind a tree at Sparrows Lane yesterday:

  • Stewart
    Stewart Posts: 2,508
    Haircut rumour cleared up. It was Grace Johnstone getting a trim. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • NabySarr said:
    NabySarr said:
    1 in 1 out might make this a very very slow window. I wonder if the owners will tell NJ he has to stick with Apter and Olafe as he only bought them last season. 

    I’d be furious if it was my money that had been wasted like that. 
    If they expected every expensive signing to go well then they were very naive in the first place. One look at pretty much every teams transfer business each season would tell them that this isn’t uncommon 
    But in this case it was every expensive signing, going poorly. 

    You can’t say that you would be happy with the situation if it was your money. 

    Olaofe was what £1.5m? Apter rumoured at £2m+. That’s really not much in the grand scheme of things and the money the owners have put into the club over the past few years 

    Look at any championship club and they’ll have signed players for more that have flopped. I’m sure we will have more flops in future years if we stay at this level. I know we aren’t used to spending money so it maybe feels worse to us, but this is normal and if the owners have a huge problem with it then they probably shouldn’t own a championship football club 
    Other clubs are irrelevant in this situation. So are hypotheticals on what we could spend. 

    It is what we have spent and they are two of our most expensive signings of the last 10 years. Certainly the two most expensive of the owners tenure. The money was paid because they were told that these were the players we needed to progress. 6 months later those players are back in league one, 12 months later we are seemingly trying to either sell them or loan them out again. 

    That’s is unacceptable, there’s no spin you can put on it that changes that. 

    We have one of the lowest budgets in the league those fees were huge for us. 
      I don’t think people can grasp how difficult it was to recruit for such a competitive league with the 3rd worst budget (or they don’t want to understand), especially when we had to overhaul most of the L1 squad. We would’ve been at the back of the queue for all signings, not being able to offer wages remotely close to the rest of the league. Our only choice would’ve been high risk signings, L1 players who maybe could make the step up and experienced championship players with dodgy injury records. Had we been relegated then there might been some merit to the criticism, but we were never in a relegation scrap and were ultimately successful. There was a high wastage in the recruitment but I believe that would have been part of the plan. What do you want, a no risk recruitment policy and a return to L1, I don’t?

    Perhaps what you find ‘unacceptable’ is the financial disadvantage we are under, in which case you should direct your frustration at the owners. Personally, I think they’ve been outstanding, to me they building a sustainable future for the club. We have come a long way since they arrived.
    Why would I find the owners spending unacceptable. 

    They were told that these players would be the ones to progress us, they paid the money required and were subsequently sold a pup. 

    I find it very funny that some of you think the owners wouldn’t be annoyed or angry with this. Us placing a significant portion of our transfer funds on two players who are now being shipped out after less than 30 appearances Between the two is absolutely mental and should be criticised. 
    Yep, definitely in the refuse to understand camp.
  • SomervilleAddick
    SomervilleAddick Posts: 3,700
    Let’s be honest. We desperately need to bring in a striker and if the rumours about our budget are true and I suspect being third or fourth lowest are correct then someone like Grant without a fee is probably good business. Has the experience we need and his age is good. Injuries to his hamstring are a concern but we are where we are in terms of who we can afford to get in. I’ll be honest I don’t know enough about Redmond to reach a verdict but I have loosely followed Grants career since he left us. Without the club blasting upwards of £8 million on a striker I’d be interested to see who the critics would have us sign ?
    Ahearne-Grant may come in on a free but I cannot see him being on less than 15k a week.  He'd have been on big dough at West Brom.
    The board have dug deep here.
    Well maybe but £15k pw isn’t digging deep in The Championship is it ? If we aspire to remain a Championship club then that’s the going rate and higher that we need to suck up. 
    If that’s it, and he wants 4 years (just an assumption, no knowledge), then we’d be paying just over £3m for a proven championship striker. That seems like a bargain. 
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 11,202
    Just spoken to my grandson again and showed him some photos of Karlan Grant and now saying it could be him but with a much fuller beard than he has in pictures on the internet 
     Nothing more concrete I am afraid 
    Sounds more like Redmond - hasn’t he got a fuller beard?
  • ButtleJR
    ButtleJR Posts: 1,767
    edited July 18
    Just spoken to my grandson again and showed him some photos of Karlan Grant and now saying it could be him but with a much fuller beard than he has in pictures on the internet 
     Nothing more concrete I am afraid 
    Sounds more like Redmond - hasn’t he got a fuller beard?
    Redmond is bald, surely would know it wasn't grant based off of that fact alone. 
  • Brownie12
    Brownie12 Posts: 1,704
    Just spoken to my grandson again and showed him some photos of Karlan Grant and now saying it could be him but with a much fuller beard than he has in pictures on the internet 
     Nothing more concrete I am afraid 
    Sounds more like Redmond - hasn’t he got a fuller beard?
    Fuller hasn’t got a beard!
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 21,112
    Just had a look in all the barbers in Sidcup, no new signings that I could see
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,801
    Just spoken to my grandson again and showed him some photos of Karlan Grant and now saying it could be him but with a much fuller beard than he has in pictures on the internet 
     Nothing more concrete I am afraid 
    Sounds more like Redmond - hasn’t he got a fuller beard?
    He was having a haircut, not a polish
  • Wijoh
    Wijoh Posts: 17
    I really think Mwamba might be a better option than CC and Doch.. his confidence on the ball and forward passing excites me. 
  • I-SAW-POUSO-PLAY
    I-SAW-POUSO-PLAY Posts: 4,656
    Weird people
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 86,825
    Wijoh said:
    I really think Mwamba might be a better option than CC and Doch.. his confidence on the ball and forward passing excites me. 
    We've looked much better with Mwamba and Doc but it's only Gills and only a PSF