Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

EFL Playoffs 25/26 (FA charge Eckhert with bringing the game into disrepute - p72)

1…666768697072»

Comments

  • Kinsella87
    Kinsella87 Posts: 591
    He has no emotion, literally looked like AI. No remorse or guilt. 
    Be interested to have a poll from saints fans on if they want him to go or not.

  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 5,590
    Be careful what you wish for. 

    If we (in the future) find ourselves the wrong side of FFP (or its new iteration) I’m sure we’d be pleading leniency. Likewise the now apparent indiscretions of TS we arguably financially benefited from. 

    Feels to me the penalty for Southampton  was swift and about right. 
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 30,597
    valleynick66 said:
    Be careful what you wish for. 

    If we (in the future) find ourselves the wrong side of FFP (or its new iteration) I’m sure we’d be pleading leniency. Likewise the now apparent indiscretions of TS we arguably financially benefited from. 

    Feels to me the penalty for Southampton  was swift and about right. 

    I think most fans do not have a problem with the penalty, more of a case what the club are saying/doing afterwards.
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 27,467
    edited June 3
    Kinsella87 said:
    He has no emotion, literally looked like AI. No remorse or guilt. 
    Be interested to have a poll from saints fans on if they want him to go or not.

    They were all licking his arse in the notes on that video, no shame at all and embarrassing to the club...
  • jose
    jose Posts: 1,683
    Plenty of Southampton fans are railing against the injustice of it all on Saintsweb, and are pleased with the latest stuff from owner and manager, relishing next season as an us against the world siege mentality motivational thing.
    I believe their mistake is thinking that everybody will be looking at them with hatred, I think it is more accurate to say the rest of the football world will be regarding them with contempt, not hatred.
  • fenlandaddick
    fenlandaddick Posts: 2,224
    Not knowing is no defence. It is the football's club job to know. 
    That manager needs to blink more , he could stare Clint Eastward down.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 5,038
    fenlandaddick said:
    Not knowing is no defence. It is the football's club job to know. 
    That manager needs to blink more , he could stare Clint Eastward down.
    Don't need to blink when you're AI
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,736
    I wonder how far along the FA investigation is. If it’s decided that bans are put in place for individuals, especially the manager, you’d think that would happen in the next month or so, especially if they need to inform Southampton to find a new manager. 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,466
    EugenesAxe said:
    fenlandaddick said:
    Not knowing is no defence. It is the football's club job to know. 
    That manager needs to blink more , he could stare Clint Eastward down.
    Don't need to blink when you're AI
    Was wondering how long before we see a robot manager?
    But think we may have already encountered one.


  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 51,437
    stoneroses19 said:
    I wonder how far along the FA investigation is. If it’s decided that bans are put in place for individuals, especially the manager, you’d think that would happen in the next month or so, especially if they need to inform Southampton to find a new manager. 
    No need to prioritise giving Southampton notice of a decision to ban Eckert. If there’s a need to find a new manager, that’s Southamptons problem. No doubt they’ll appeal again anyway. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 30,597
    fenlandaddick said:
    Not knowing is no defence. It is the football's club job to know. 
    That manager needs to blink more , he could stare Clint Eastward down.

    Starmer will be their manager one day.
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,466
    ElfsborgAddick said:
    fenlandaddick said:
    Not knowing is no defence. It is the football's club job to know. 
    That manager needs to blink more , he could stare Clint Eastward down.

    Starmer will be their manager one day.
    Think he maybe even less popular in Southampton than he is the rest of the country atm.
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,374
    edited July 22
    Reports coming out that Southampton and their manager have been charged by the FA 


  • clive
    clive Posts: 20,603
    https://www.southamptonfc.com/en/news/article/club-statement-fa-charges
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 20,975
    The local paper down there are saying Southampton jumped the gun and it was meant to be announced tomorrow 
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,374

  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 27,467
    Saints could well be looking for a new manager soon...🤔
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,466
    eastterrace6168 said:
    Saints could well be looking for a new manager soon...🤔
    I think it's safe to say that we don't have to worry about Nathan being poached.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 5,038
    Extremely low class response from Southampton, not really owning it at all, kind of saying  yeah the FA are entitled to their opinion but we didn't do anything wrong. Maybe they should look for some Argentinian players for the side too. Shrug.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 7,549
    edited July 22
    EugenesAxe said:
    Extremely low class response from Southampton, not really owning it at all, kind of saying  yeah the FA are entitled to their opinion but we didn't do anything wrong. Maybe they should look for some Argentinian players for the side too. Shrug.
    I think they have been classless up to now, but I'm not sure what they would be expected to say in this instance? Their statement acknowledges the action, states that they will co-operate, gives fans comfort that outside of that process it's business as usual, and recognises that they can't say more because it's an ongoing process. I'm not sure what's "low class" about it. I actually think this is perhaps the first time in this saga they have had some decent PR guidance.

    ps assumes we are reading the same statement - copied below.

    Southampton Football Club and First Team Head Coach Tonda Eckert acknowledge today’s charges from The FA relating to a breach of Rule E3.1.

    Tonda and the club will continue to cooperate fully and openly with The FA.Our focus remains on preparations for the 2026/27 Championship season. The club remains fully supportive of Tonda and his staff as we work towards our ambition of returning to the Premier League.We are unable to comment further while the process remains ongoing, but we will provide an update to supporters as soon as we are in a position to do so.

  • Sponsored links:



  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 30,862
    fenaddick said:
    The local paper down there are saying Southampton jumped the gun and it was meant to be announced tomorrow 
    Perhaps, they've got an intern working at the FA.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 5,038
    SporadicAddick said:
    EugenesAxe said:
    Extremely low class response from Southampton, not really owning it at all, kind of saying  yeah the FA are entitled to their opinion but we didn't do anything wrong. Maybe they should look for some Argentinian players for the side too. Shrug.
    I think they have been classless up to now, but I'm not sure what they would be expected to say in this instance? Their statement acknowledges the action, states that they will co-operate, gives fans comfort that outside of that process it's business as usual, and recognises that they can't say more because it's an ongoing process. I'm not sure what's "low class" about it. I actually think this is perhaps the first time in this saga they have had some decent PR guidance.

    ps assumes we are reading the same statement - copied below.

    Southampton Football Club and First Team Head Coach Tonda Eckert acknowledge today’s charges from The FA relating to a breach of Rule E3.1.

    Tonda and the club will continue to cooperate fully and openly with The FA.

    Our focus remains on preparations for the 2026/27 Championship season. The club remains fully supportive of Tonda and his staff as we work towards our ambition of returning to the Premier League.

    We are unable to comment further while the process remains ongoing, but we will provide an update to supporters as soon as we are in a position to do so.

    I mean their handling of the whole incident, this statement is very PR correct, I've a hunch their final statement and actions will be more of the same.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 37,634
    Stupid that it's taken this long to charge him.

    They've had two months to sort this out and they wait until teams are back in pre-season training with the new season not far away.
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,466
    guinnessaddick said:
    fenaddick said:
    The local paper down there are saying Southampton jumped the gun and it was meant to be announced tomorrow 
    Perhaps, they've got an intern working at the FA.

Categories