Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Karoy Anderson - p33. Joins Blackpool on a perm

1313233343537»

Comments

  • LittleAddick
    LittleAddick Posts: 782
    I think the Pratley comparison when it comes to being limited technically isn't doing Darren justice - always thought he was more tidy than people gave him credit for.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 72,668
    I think the Pratley comparison when it comes to being limited technically isn't doing Darren justice - always thought he was more tidy than people gave him credit for.
    Pratley played in a very technical Swansea side, that tried to pass the ball like prime Barcelona. Even if his role in the side was a defensive one, you don't get to play in such a team if all you can do is run and tackle.
  • LittleAddick
    LittleAddick Posts: 782
    I think the Pratley comparison when it comes to being limited technically isn't doing Darren justice - always thought he was more tidy than people gave him credit for.
    Pratley played in a very technical Swansea side, that tried to pass the ball like prime Barcelona. Even if his role in the side was a defensive one, you don't get to play in such a team if all you can do is run and tackle.
    Exactly, while nearly getting into double figures from midfield.

    He very rarely gave the ball away for us.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 18,644
    edited July 23
    I don't think he was that good technically, and I heard him say it himself a few times, but it's all about opinions at the end of the day. And he was good for us.

    Still, I know people don't enjoy NJ's brand of football, but I've never disliked watching us more than the Pratson era...
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 6,169
    Chunes said:
    I don't think he was that good technically, and I heard him say it himself a few times, but it's all about opinions at the end of the day. And he was good for us.

    Still, I know people don't enjoy NJ's brand of football, but I've never disliked watching us more than the Pratson era...
    Not sure Pratley deserves to be in the same breath as Watson.  I’ll give you foley and crofts as an even worse era . 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 24,140
    I think the Pratley comparison when it comes to being limited technically isn't doing Darren justice - always thought he was more tidy than people gave him credit for.
    Pratley played in a very technical Swansea side, that tried to pass the ball like prime Barcelona. Even if his role in the side was a defensive one, you don't get to play in such a team if all you can do is run and tackle.
    Exactly, while nearly getting into double figures from midfield.

    He very rarely gave the ball away for us.
    This is some genuinely breathtaking revisionism lmao. You should be forced to watch every game we played in that era with your eyes held open like in A Clockwork Orange 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 24,140
    wmcf123 said:
    Chunes said:
    I don't think he was that good technically, and I heard him say it himself a few times, but it's all about opinions at the end of the day. And he was good for us.

    Still, I know people don't enjoy NJ's brand of football, but I've never disliked watching us more than the Pratson era...
    Not sure Pratley deserves to be in the same breath as Watson.  I’ll give you foley and crofts as an even worse era . 
    This was worse though, yes. And Gilbey/Arter was somehow even worse than that 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 18,644
    wmcf123 said:
    Chunes said:
    I don't think he was that good technically, and I heard him say it himself a few times, but it's all about opinions at the end of the day. And he was good for us.

    Still, I know people don't enjoy NJ's brand of football, but I've never disliked watching us more than the Pratson era...
    Not sure Pratley deserves to be in the same breath as Watson.  I’ll give you foley and crofts as an even worse era . 
    Granted I missed that era. Was living abroad and that was before the days of watching games on a stream. Seems I did myself a favour there.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 6,169
    Leuth said:
    wmcf123 said:
    Chunes said:
    I don't think he was that good technically, and I heard him say it himself a few times, but it's all about opinions at the end of the day. And he was good for us.

    Still, I know people don't enjoy NJ's brand of football, but I've never disliked watching us more than the Pratson era...
    Not sure Pratley deserves to be in the same breath as Watson.  I’ll give you foley and crofts as an even worse era . 
    This was worse though, yes. And Gilbey/Arter was somehow even worse than that 
    Was it against Portsmouth when Arter, Watson and Gilbey all played .  Somehow we didn’t lose .  
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,392
    Getting a perm with dreadlocks. :open_mouth:

  • Sponsored links:



  • LittleAddick
    LittleAddick Posts: 782
    Leuth said:
    I think the Pratley comparison when it comes to being limited technically isn't doing Darren justice - always thought he was more tidy than people gave him credit for.
    Pratley played in a very technical Swansea side, that tried to pass the ball like prime Barcelona. Even if his role in the side was a defensive one, you don't get to play in such a team if all you can do is run and tackle.
    Exactly, while nearly getting into double figures from midfield.

    He very rarely gave the ball away for us.
    This is some genuinely breathtaking revisionism lmao. You should be forced to watch every game we played in that era with your eyes held open like in A Clockwork Orange 
    Think it's a shame we're only remembering Pratley for his last season when he was 36 by the end of it! And not the two before that where he played a crucial role.