Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Another academy prospect poached

1234568

Comments


  • Scoham said:
    Another one gone before they’ve even finished school.



    This makes me so angry. Grrr. 
    He was top scorer last year and all was going well, then he got an England squad call up and the calls started ……….. he’s from a great family who have their heads firmly screwed on. Shame to lose him but cat 1 does give him more opportunities. 
  • Cloudworm
    Cloudworm Posts: 993
    This started in 92 and is endorsed by all those who bought Sky subscriptions and continue to support the league structure as it is. 
  • I’m surprised clubs like ours aren’t more willing to go public, strongly, with criticism of the system. It gets to the limit where if you’re never going to see another Gomez level player then what’s the point? And you feel that if a club like ours said we’d shut our academy under the pressure it’s a wake up call 
  • WRICURKINCAM
    WRICURKINCAM Posts: 460
    Child trafficking is broadly recognized and addressed during global and national awareness periods, most notably the UN-designated World Day Against Trafficking in Persons on July 30, and National Child Exploitation Awareness Day on March 18, which includes child trafficking and modern slavery. January is also observed as National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month. Football, the beautiful game. Just ask Gianni Infanticide. Football. A cess-pit of greed.
  • Radostanradical
    Radostanradical Posts: 1,484
    edited August 14
    I have a real disdain for these type instagram accounts (talenthunter, risingballers etc) that seek to highlight youth talent, they are often just trying to get a scoop before anyone else and don't really care about promoting talent etc. They have no real consideration for the wellbeing put on these kids.

    Obviously I hope all these kids realise their dreams and become professional footballers but even those heradled at 14/15/16 years old will unlikely go on to have a professional career of note (if any) and these accounts that used them as content will not be there at 18/19 to help them pick up the pieces of these young men who have often neglected academic studies or altenative career paths.
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,406
    Ironically the only elite attacking players we've 'produced' over the last decade (Lookman and Aribo) were in turn poached from clubs far lower in the pyramid than us. 
    They weren’t poached in this sense though. They were footballers who were signed in circumstances where the move was a positive for the player and the selling club. Aribo was 19 playing for a non-league team and his manager actively recommended him to Charlton for a trial because there was no future in him playing for Staines Town. Lookman was playing for a Sunday league team and the move to Charlton turned him into a professional footballer. The players we are losing are kids from a professional academy that exists with the intention of developing players for our first team. We have invested a lot of time into them and they are being pulled away as children at a time where it costs the bigger club the least to do so.

    It’s gross that this has become the norm and it’s going to become next to impossible for us to produce top players going forward, which in turn makes it harder for us to close the gap between ourselves and the teams already established at the top
    Staines Town are no more. Dissolved by a money-grabbing Chairman.
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 11,055
    Ironically the only elite attacking players we've 'produced' over the last decade (Lookman and Aribo) were in turn poached from clubs far lower in the pyramid than us. 
    They weren’t poached in this sense though. They were footballers who were signed in circumstances where the move was a positive for the player and the selling club. Aribo was 19 playing for a non-league team and his manager actively recommended him to Charlton for a trial because there was no future in him playing for Staines Town. Lookman was playing for a Sunday league team and the move to Charlton turned him into a professional footballer. The players we are losing are kids from a professional academy that exists with the intention of developing players for our first team. We have invested a lot of time into them and they are being pulled away as children at a time where it costs the bigger club the least to do so.

    It’s gross that this has become the norm and it’s going to become next to impossible for us to produce top players going forward, which in turn makes it harder for us to close the gap between ourselves and the teams already established at the top
    Staines Town are no more. Dissolved by a money-grabbing Chairman.
    That was an absolute shambles , believe Brentford brought the ground in the end and their B Team play there? 
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,406
    edited August 14
    MarcusH26 said:
    Ironically the only elite attacking players we've 'produced' over the last decade (Lookman and Aribo) were in turn poached from clubs far lower in the pyramid than us. 
    They weren’t poached in this sense though. They were footballers who were signed in circumstances where the move was a positive for the player and the selling club. Aribo was 19 playing for a non-league team and his manager actively recommended him to Charlton for a trial because there was no future in him playing for Staines Town. Lookman was playing for a Sunday league team and the move to Charlton turned him into a professional footballer. The players we are losing are kids from a professional academy that exists with the intention of developing players for our first team. We have invested a lot of time into them and they are being pulled away as children at a time where it costs the bigger club the least to do so.

    It’s gross that this has become the norm and it’s going to become next to impossible for us to produce top players going forward, which in turn makes it harder for us to close the gap between ourselves and the teams already established at the top
    Staines Town are no more. Dissolved by a money-grabbing Chairman.
    That was an absolute shambles , believe Brentford brought the ground in the end and their B Team play there? 
    You could be right. I certainly saw our U21s lose there season before last, where our promising youngsters (inc Fullah) got totally bullied by the Bees.  Dixon our only bright spot. 
  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,692
    Very disappointing but no guarantee the poached lads will make it. Strange that all the top scouts knew about Lookman but we were the only team to take a chance due to his size. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 22,815


  • Sponsored links:



  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 24,795
    Hope he knows what he's doing, lots of talent get hoovered up by the big boys then emptied into the dustbin a few years later
  • jose
    jose Posts: 1,885
    One difference cat 1 would bring would be the better standard of opponents.
  • Being capped for England is a curse from our POV
  • 2121
    2121 Posts: 1,813
    Wheres he going? Chelsea? 
  • The only way this will stop is if all the championship/ league one/ league two owners come out with a statement, that they will not be using clubs that hoover up talent for loans as a way of saying "you can have the players but we won't  help develop them". Obviously won't happen as it would require a high level of trust, which won't happen when money is involved.  Or even go as far to blacklist said players until say 25 to make players think twice about it. Again won't happen for obvious reasons.
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,761
    On the other had what about all the Academy players we have let go. It’s a shame. Dow we get any compensation for this ? 
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 34,556
    2121 said:
    Wheres he going? Chelsea? 
    I’d guess there, City or Arsenal. If it is Chelsea it’s just another reason to hate them, as if any more were needed.
  • Chelsea are under an embargo aren’t they? I thought they were not allowed to sign youth players or something like that 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 2,891
    ct_addick said:
    On the other had what about all the Academy players we have let go. It’s a shame. Dow we get any compensation for this ? 
    We get compensation but it will be peanuts compared to what he will go for in the future if his next club don’t ruin his development 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 2,891
    Chelsea are under an embargo aren’t they? I thought they were not allowed to sign youth players or something like that 
    rules don’t apply to Chelsea 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,424
    Chelsea are under an embargo aren’t they? I thought they were not allowed to sign youth players or something like that 
    They definitely can, a friends younger brother recently signed for them from Wigan. 
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 31,266
    edited August 18
    Chelsea are under an embargo aren’t they? I thought they were not allowed to sign youth players or something like that 
    They definitely can, a friends younger brother recently signed for them from Wigan. 
    Think it’s suspended.
  • clive
    clive Posts: 20,791
    Chelsea are under an embargo aren’t they? I thought they were not allowed to sign youth players or something like that 
    They definitely can, a friends younger brother recently signed for them from Wigan. 
    Think it’s suspended.
    Chelsea have been fined £10m and given a suspended two-window transfer ban by an independent appeal board after admitting breaches of Football Association agent rules, the FA has announced.

     https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/13568791/chelsea-handed-lb10m-fine-and-suspended-transfer-ban-after-admitting-fa-rule-breaches-dating-back-to-roman-abramovich-era
  • Athletico Charlton
    Athletico Charlton Posts: 15,239
    edited August 18
    I've said it before, but players who leave clubs before signing a contract should have to pay a % of future earnings as a player to the club imo. 

    Would make them think harder about the decision. Otherwise so many academies outside the PL will become unviable. 

    The pillaging of academies gets worse every year and has now become a PL wide business plan which maintains the status quo of teams. 
  • I've said it before, but players who leave clubs before signing a contract should have to pay a % of future earnings as a player to the club imo. 

    Would make them think harder about the decision. Otherwise so many academies outside the PL will become unviable. 

    The pillaging of academies gets worse every year and has now become a PL wide business plan which maintains the status quo of teams. 
    Don’t think you can really blame a 15-16 year old kid. 

    It’s the whole compensation package that is the problem. Clubs should be able to sell on their terms not just have to roll over and take it. 

    The club that are getting the player should have to be substantially more at the point of transfer. The onus should be on the clubs the players are going to to have to be certain that the player is one for the future and the best way to do that is to increase compensation packages to such a degree that it becomes almost unviable to take punts on players 
  • 2121 said:
    Wheres he going? Chelsea? 

    I was told by the person who told me a few months back that he was going to Arsenal 
  • mart77
    mart77 Posts: 6,102
    Ezenwata signed for Brighton
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 22,815

  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 2,891
    edited August 19
    They took us not selling Mbick to them personally 
  • Athletico Charlton
    Athletico Charlton Posts: 15,239
    edited August 19
    mart77 said:
    Ezenwata signed for Brighton

    Hope everyone that went on one of the coaches to save them all those years ago are happy with themselves as they have repaid us by coming back for Beadle and now this fella.  Worse than Chelsea.